10:48 PM
To: Gustav Wikström
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-publish.el: Speed up
org-publish-cache-file-needs-publishing
Gustav Wikström writes:
> Aha, hmm... I don't remember commiting any other persons code. I
> honestly think it's just me fixing the same thing thing that
> apparently al
Hi Bastien,
> oh, you're right! Sorry I pinged you for nothing on this.
No worries!
Best wishes,
Emily
Hi Emily,
Emily Bourke writes:
> It looks like the same changes have been made separately and merged
> into master since my original email – see commit
> aa0fa8c75360d2aa491b9ae10e59d22de2aedc92 by Gustav Wikström.
oh, you're right! Sorry I pinged you for nothing on this.
Gustav, for next
Hi Bastien,
It looks like the same changes have been made separately and merged into master
since my original email – see commit aa0fa8c75360d2aa491b9ae10e59d22de2aedc92
by Gustav Wikström.
Best wishes,
Emily
Hi Bastien,
> Tomorrow for sure, and probably next week will be okay too.
Perfect, I’ll get back to you once I’ve taken a look tomorrow.
> To be clear, I hope we can release 9.5 soon to be able to make it
> included in the next Emacs 28.1 version.
Understood, thanks for the clarification.
Hi Emily,
thanks for your quick feedback!
Emily Bourke writes:
>> ... did you have time to take a closer look at this?
>
> I’m afraid I haven’t had any look at this since. However, I’ll have
> time tomorrow and later in the week to take a look – will that be
> early enough for the 9.5 release?
Hi Bastien,
Thanks for getting in touch!
> ... did you have time to take a closer look at this?
I’m afraid I haven’t had any look at this since. However, I’ll have time
tomorrow and later in the week to take a look – will that be early enough for
the 9.5 release?
Best wishes,
Emily
Hi Emily,
sorry to bump an old thread...
Emily Bourke writes:
> I'm afraid I haven't had a chance to look at this any further since
> my last email. I'll try to find some time this week.
... did you have time to take a closer look at this?
We are working on preparing Org 9.5, hopefully
Hi Bastien,
> thanks for the patch and sorry to reactivate this old thread.
No problem, thanks for getting in touch - the reminder is appreciated.
> Did you find time to make the tests and, perhaps, to update the patch?
I'm afraid I haven't had a chance to look at this any further since my
Hi Emily,
thanks for the patch and sorry to reactivate this old thread.
Did you find time to make the tests and, perhaps, to update the patch?
Please let us know - thanks!
--
Bastien
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Nothing jumps out to me. For large files that are already visited, I
> suppose find-file-noselect returning an existing buffer can be faster,
> so relevant factors would include how many Org files a project has, how
> large they are, and how many of those are visited in
Thanks for the feedback!
> Nothing jumps out to me. For large files that are already visited, I
> suppose find-file-noselect returning an existing buffer can be faster,
> so relevant factors would include how many Org files a project has, how
> large they are, and how many of those are visited in
t gain, though that gain would be
narrowed some if the temporary buffer was put into org-mode rather than
kept in fundamental-mode (more below).
> Subject: [PATCH] ox-publish.el: Speed up
> org-publish-cache-file-needs-publishing
>
> * lisp/ox-publish.el (org-publish-cache-file-
Hi,
I found publishing when there were no changes to be slower than expected.
Profiling showed me that `org-publish-cache-file-needs-publishing' was invoking
the `after-find-file' hooks, which I don't think is necessary.
I've changed it to avoid doing that, by using `with-temp-buffer' and
14 matches
Mail list logo
