Trailing whitespace after export snippets without a transcoder (was: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments)

2024-04-20 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> +#+begin_src org >> +The following line may become a patagraph separator. >> +@@comment: might give unexpected effect @@ >> +Put some text before @@comment: a better variant >> +@@ and after instread. >> +#+end_src >> >> I am no longer able to

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2024-04-17 Thread Max Nikulin
On 15/04/2024 19:17, Ihor Radchenko wrote: +#+begin_src org +The following line may become a patagraph separator. +@@comment: might give unexpected effect @@ +Put some text before @@comment: a better variant +@@ and after instread. +#+end_src I am no longer able to reproduce the problem with

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2024-04-15 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: +#+begin_src org +The following line may become a patagraph separator. +@@comment: might give unexpected effect @@ +Put some text before @@comment: a better variant +@@ and after instread. +#+end_src >>> >>> May you please elaborate? >>> If

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-09-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: > On 08/07/2023 16:31, Ihor Radchenko wrote: - it is what we use ourselves in WORG sources. > >> Max Nikulin writes: >>> I have not found it in the worg repository. There are enough @@html:@@ >>> with a handful of @@latex:@@. >> >> Yeah, not in WORG. >>

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-10 Thread Max Nikulin
On 08/07/2023 16:31, Ihor Radchenko wrote: - it is what we use ourselves in WORG sources. Max Nikulin writes: I have not found it in the worg repository. There are enough @@html:@@ with a handful of @@latex:@@. Yeah, not in WORG. https://orgmode.org/quickstart.html#text-comments It makes

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-08 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog, >> but not as a quick answer to a question. I recommend leaving only the >> @@comment:...@@ part > > See a shortened variant. Thanks! >> - it is what we use ourselves in WORG sources. > > I have not

[PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-07 Thread Max Nikulin
Subject: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments * org-faq.org (Export): New heading describing workarounds for inline comments. --- org-faq.org | 32 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) diff --git a/org-faq.org b/org-faq.org index ab661395..42cd2ef4 100644 --- a/org