Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-10-01 Thread Jean-Marie Gaillourdet
Hi, while we are discussing a new org-remember facility. I've been missing an option to clock the time I've taken to write down my remember note. E.g. I use remember to make a small protocoll of a telephone call or some discussion with a colleague. It would help me alot to if that time would be cl

Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-09-30 Thread Sebastian Rose
Yes, good concept. > yes > >> - possibility to 'pick file/topic first then remember' > > No. The idea would be that you refile then or later. No problem for me. I don't remember a case, when I had to change the tempalte or target after filling it. And still, there is `org-remember-goto-last-s

Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-09-30 Thread Tim O'Callaghan
> - 'throw it into the bucket for later'. > > what does that mean? Kind of works as remember now. Currently you have a 'default save to point' for a particular template. I would guess that most people just throw it all into the one 'bucket' and sort it out later. > >> - org - remember keymap > >

Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-09-30 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote: +1, can we keep/have: - the templates, yes - possibility to 'pick file/topic first then remember' No. The idea would be that you refile then or later. - 'throw it into the bucket for later'. what does that mean? - org - remember ke

Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-09-30 Thread Tim O'Callaghan
+1, can we keep/have: - the templates, - possibility to 'pick file/topic first then remember' - 'throw it into the bucket for later'. - org - remember keymap - local fontification? - remove need to have remember package installed? Tim. 2009/9/30 Carsten Dominik : > I don't know what the others th

Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-09-30 Thread Carsten Dominik
I don't know what the others think ... but I think this is a brilliant idea. - Carsten On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Samuel Wales wrote: Hi Carsten, Here is an idea for a much simpler remember architecture that simultaneously solves Alan's problem. 1) To me also, a more complicated way

Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-09-30 Thread Eric S Fraga
At Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:48:53 -0700, Samuel Wales wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > Here is an idea for a much simpler remember architecture that > simultaneously solves Alan's problem. [...] > 5) Here is my idea: discard the concept of remember > buffers entirely. > - Create the entry at t

A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: [Orgmode] Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-09-29 Thread Samuel Wales
Hi Carsten, Here is an idea for a much simpler remember architecture that simultaneously solves Alan's problem. 1) To me also, a more complicated way to deal with remember buffers feels wrong. 2) If there is more than one thing you are working on, the power of the org hierarchy feel