On 5/12/24 07:18, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
I looked into this further, and found
exporters/taskjuggler/ox-taskjuggler.org
that has whole "TODO" subtrees hidden with :noexport: tag.
Such half-ready subtrees are not really ready for normal viewing and are
mostly a material for WORG hackers to work
Adam Porter writes:
>> 2. Put notes into LOGBOOK drawers (set `org-log-into-drawer' in WORG
>> dirlocals)
>> 3. Change `org-html-format-drawer-function' during publishing to mark
>> the LOGBOOK drawers with a distinct class.
>> 4. Enable org-inlinetask library during publishing.
>>
>>
On 4/1/24 06:34, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
What we may do is the following:
1. Make sure that we stick to the recommended todo keywords, so that
todo keywords have a known-in-advance class in html export.
2. Put notes into LOGBOOK drawers (set `org-log-into-drawer' in WORG
dirlocals)
3.
Adam Porter writes:
>> May we have some kind of css-based toggle that will enable "developer
>> mode", revealing all the todo keywords, inlinetasks, and notes? Then, we
>> hide the "unfinished" parts from users by default, but let them see what
>> can be contributed?
>
> I like the idea of a
On 3/30/24 05:47, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Adam Porter writes:
Using a normal heading for a task would "commandeer" the structure of
the document, which I think is a real problem.
Not really. If some section is incomplete, marking it "TODO" means that
it should be completed. And the details
Adam Porter writes:
> Using a normal heading for a task would "commandeer" the structure of
> the document, which I think is a real problem.
Not really. If some section is incomplete, marking it "TODO" means that
it should be completed. And the details might be listed in the logbook
notes, for
Hi Tom,
On 3/29/24 18:30, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Here's another potential solution that I find useful.
d. Keeping tasks under a heading held back from export.
I have a capture template that saves tasks about the document under a *
Tasks :no-export: heading. To keep the agenda sane, I don't add
Aloha all,
Adam Porter writes:
On 3/29/24 04:48, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Also, we may consider re-using inlinetask style for TODO:
entries.
Rather than
#+begin_center
TODO: Even better, find a volunteer to maintain this
information!
#+end_center
We can do
On 3/29/24 04:48, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Also, we may consider re-using inlinetask style for TODO: entries.
Rather than
#+begin_center
TODO: Even better, find a volunteer to maintain this information!
#+end_center
We can do
TODO Even better, ...
That is a lot of
