Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Jonas Bernoulli writes:
>
>> `htmlize' is currently maintained at https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize
>> but its maintainer hasn't been responding to any issues and pull-requests
>> for quite some time now and seems to be inactive on Github altogether.
>
> Hmm...
Hi All,
I'm currently traveling, but it seems like it would be good to chime in here.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, at 5:22 PM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Bastien Guerry writes:
>
>> If not, then relying on engrave-faces, which is maintained and also
>> handles LaTeX, instead of htmlize, sounds like a
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Bastien Guerry writes:
>
>> If not, then relying on engrave-faces, which is maintained and also
>> handles LaTeX, instead of htmlize, sounds like a good idea.
>
> I'd like to hear Timothy's opinion on this. He is the author of
> engrave-faces and the maintainer of
Bastien Guerry writes:
> It looks like engrave-faces already does a better job than htmlize.el,
> and does it for LaTeX too, I see no drawback in using engrave-faces as
> a replacement of htmlize.el. Are there any?
engrave-faces is technically in "beta".
Bastien Guerry writes:
> If not, then relying on engrave-faces, which is maintained and also
> handles LaTeX, instead of htmlize, sounds like a good idea.
I'd like to hear Timothy's opinion on this. He is the author of
engrave-faces and the maintainer of ox-html.
--
Ihor Radchenko //
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> That's what I meant. The latest thread named some issue with fine-tuning
> the output and never got any follow-up.
(Please ignore my suggestion to explore the htmlfontify.el scenario.)
>>> As for engrave-faces, it is working for both LaTeX and HTML export.
>>
>> Would
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> That's fine to install htmlize. Org relies upon htmlize for certain
> features, including HTML export.
A while ago, it has been suggested to rely on htmlfontify.el, which is
part of Emacs core, instead of htmlize.el.
Maybe this is still relevant?
If not, then relying
Philip Kaludercic writes:
>> Nicolas once tried to port htmlize support into htmlfontify [1], but it
>> did not go well [2].
>>
>> [1] https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/874lnw5rfi@nicolasgoaziou.fr/
>> [2] https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/874ldzovv4@nicolasgoaziou.fr/
>
> How come you
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Philip Kaludercic writes:
>
>>> We might consider extending engrave-faces to cover all the htmlize
>>> features.
>>
>> Perhaps I missed something, but is there an issue with the built-in
>> `htmlfontify'?
>
> Org uses htmlize historically.
> Nicolas once tried to port
Philip Kaludercic writes:
>> We might consider extending engrave-faces to cover all the htmlize
>> features.
>
> Perhaps I missed something, but is there an issue with the built-in
> `htmlfontify'?
Org uses htmlize historically.
Nicolas once tried to port htmlize support into htmlfontify [1],
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Jonas Bernoulli writes:
>
>> `htmlize' is currently maintained at https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize
>> but its maintainer hasn't been responding to any issues and pull-requests
>> for quite some time now and seems to be inactive on Github altogether.
>
> Hmm...
Jonas Bernoulli writes:
>> Hmm... Org has built-in htmlize support and I did not know that it is
>> not maintained actively.
>
> I only installed htmlize because org-html-fontify-code told me to do so.
> Should it not have done that? I did not have any version of htmlize
> installed prior to
[fyi that is probably not related: i use htmlize.el for functions it
has that allow you to copy a region omitting invisible parts. e.g.
partly folded magit. i haven't found other code that workd for that
and myb rain could not construct any.]
On 8/13/23, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Jonas
Jonas Bernoulli writes:
> `htmlize' is currently maintained at https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize
> but its maintainer hasn't been responding to any issues and pull-requests
> for quite some time now and seems to be inactive on Github altogether.
Hmm... Org has built-in htmlize support
14 matches
Mail list logo
