[D'oh: I replied to Carsten only - sorry about that.]
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 16:27:15 -0400
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com>
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com>
cc: nicholas.do...@hp.com
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Make
file
Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
> > emacs
> > -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>
> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
> am not even sure about Emacs 22.
>
emacs-22 groks -Q (or in long form: --no-init-file --no-site-file
- --no-splash). xemacs21[1] seems to use long form options with a single
dash: -no-init-file (== -q) and -no-site-file.
The thing is that (with git) it's easy to make such changes locally,
while waiting (perhaps for ever !-) for upstream: have a local branch
with a few changes that are specific to the local setup and rebase
after a pull.
Nick
[1] According to an online manpage: http://linux.die.net/man/1/xemacs
------- End of Forwarded Message
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
