Ignacio Casso writes:
>> So the problem is in (org-user-idle-seconds), which in my window system
>> boils down to a call to (current-idle-time). It should return 0 after
>> answering the prompt, but in my system it keeps counting up. At this
>> point I stopped investigating since that function
Thanks for your answer! I will do that as soon as I have a little more time.
Ignacio Casso writes:
>> Hmm, I see the problem. I didn't think about that.
>> Thank you very much for your suggestion. But what about using
>> read-char-exclusive? It seems to have a timeout argument too, and
>>
> Hmm, I see the problem. I didn't think about that.
> Thank you very much for your suggestion. But what about using
> read-char-exclusive? It seems to have a timeout argument too, and
> should apparently fix the issue (ie. the prompt will no longer
> disappear at the first unintentional click).
Hmm, I see the problem. I didn't think about that.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. But what about using
read-char-exclusive? It seems to have a timeout argument too, and should
apparently fix the issue (ie. the prompt will no longer disappear at the first
unintentional click).
Romeo
> Hi,
>
> I don't know how closely it is related to your problem, but I've
> reported another issue revolving around the use of read-char for the
> prompt to resolve clocks. See
> [[https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2022-02/msg00278.html]].
>
> Unfortunately I an not advanced
Hi,
I don't know how closely it is related to your problem, but I've reported
another issue revolving around the use of read-char for the prompt to resolve
clocks.
See [[https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2022-02/msg00278.html]].
Unfortunately I an not advanced enough in Elisp to
> So the problem is in (org-user-idle-seconds), which in my window system
> boils down to a call to (current-idle-time). It should return 0 after
> answering the prompt, but in my system it keeps counting up. At this
> point I stopped investigating since that function is defined in C.
>
I have
