Hi Thorsten
First thank you very much for creating outshine.
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> I'm not sure how orgstruct-mode does it, but since outshine is a minor
> mode, it cannot use Key bindings exactly like Org, since many of these
> are used in
Michael Brand writes:
Hello Micheal,
> My requirements for orgstruct-mode or its replacement are very limited
> compared to what orgstruct-mode or outshine.el do or intend to do:
> 4) Key bindings exactly like Org
> All items 3)..7) are supported in orgstruct-mode,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Michael Brand
wrote:
> 6) No syntax highlighting of headings
To get the above behavior of orgstruct-mode in outshine for
programming modes I added outshine-fontify. It makes me ready to let
orgstruct-mode go.
outshine-fontify is a
Michael Brand writes:
> I assume in the above sentence you meant that a comment to be a
> heading has not to be indented.
Well, yes and no. On my config, " ;;; test" is highlighted as a
heading, but it's only foldable as ";;; test".
> That is at least what I
i wrote this a long time ago to summarize the different options for
editing notes in org.
warning: it might make zero sense to you.
maybe it will be useful to somebody.
===
sometimes you want the notes to stay in your external file
(example: whatever.el). but edit them in org mode.
orgstruct
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I am glad you are not planning to remove orgtbl-mode. In particular, in
> connection with radio tables, it is a feature that I use constantly, so I
> would object strongly to removing it.
Of course. "orgtbl-mode" is nice and certainly shouldn't
Hi Adam
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Adam Porter wrote:
> ;; Regular comment
> ;;; Heading level 1
> Heading level 2
> ...
>
> Then any comment that starts with 3 or more semicolons is indented to
> the left edge and becomes a collapsible heading, regardless of the
Hi Rasmus
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> FWIW, I use similar patterns,
>
> ;; outline-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
> ;; orgstruct-heading-prefix-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
Thank you, I will try that out.
Michael
Hi Adam
Thank you for all the explanations that I will study and try later.
Especially the origami package looks very useful to me.
Michael
Michael Brand writes:
> orgstruct-mode supports it with orgstruct-heading-prefix-regexp set to
> for example " *;;;* ".
FWIW, I use similar patterns,
;; outline-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
;; orgstruct-heading-prefix-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
Rasmus
--
This is
Michael Brand writes:
Hi Michael,
> First thank you for taking over maintenance of outshine.el from
> Thorsten Jolitz.
Well, I figured it was the least I could do, since he's put so much
effort into outshine, outorg, and navi-mode over the years. Be advised,
Hi Adam
First thank you for taking over maintenance of outshine.el from Thorsten Jolitz.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Adam Porter wrote:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> I also would like to see a minor-mode for Org-like cycling when using
>> outline-minor-mode, as
Rasmus writes:
> I also would like to see a minor-mode for Org-like cycling when using
> outline-minor-mode, as I use this feature in init.el.
Outshine provides this feature. In my init file, I have headers like:
Org
And when I press TAB with point on that line, it
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for bringing this up.
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base. Here is
> the rationale:
Ugh, I use it in init.el and for emails, but it doesn’t work great in
message-mode anyway. I miss list handling. Supposedly, you can get Emacs
to handle lists,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base. Here is
> the rationale:
>
> 1. It is broken. It might look like using Org in another buffer, but it
>is not. In particular, it just cannot cope with lists,
Thanks for pointing out speed keys in outshine.el that I was not aware
of. However I still failed.
My requirements for orgstruct-mode or its replacement are very limited
compared to what orgstruct-mode or outshine.el do or intend to do:
1) Only headings, no lists
2) No structure editing, only
Hi Nicolas,
I have not problems with removing orgstruct-mode, it is indeed a bad hack
and I am no longer using it.
I am glad you are not planning to remove orgtbl-mode. In particular, in
connection with radio tables, it is a feature that I use constantly, so I
would object strongly to removing
Hi Nicolas,
2017ko abuztuak 20an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base.
FWIW, +1 from me. I often bumped up against org-struct related
difficulties when coding on org, and I can easily imagine that removing
it will make
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:00 AM Michael Brand
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> If I understand correctly orgstruct-mode has much more convenient key
> bindings like TAB and its variants for cycling than outshine.el or
> outline-minor-mode which is a big advantage for me. When
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:58 AM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base.
Like many others who replied here, I also do not use Org Struct. So its
removal will have no effect on my workflow.
> 5. There are
On Tuesday, 22 Aug 2017 at 08:58, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
> Out of curiosity: did anyone consider using lentic
> (https://github.com/phillord/lentic) for that?
I did look at this in the past but it seemed overkill for emails... and
I use babel when programming otherwise so don't really
Hi all,
I'm in a similar situation - I only use Org-struct for my init.el, I'm
fine with dropping it.
On 2017-08-21, at 07:47, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to use
>> it,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base.
Like others, I only use Org Struct mode to get some Org-like list
handling and such when I'm writing email, and as Nicolas observes, it
barely works. So I'm OK with this,
Hello.
I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to
use it, especially for emails. I now simply change the mode to
org, write whatever content I want, and then switch back to
message mode to send my email. [...]
I do exactly as Eric says here.
Actually, I didn't knew about
Hi all
If I understand correctly orgstruct-mode has much more convenient key
bindings like TAB and its variants for cycling than outshine.el or
outline-minor-mode which is a big advantage for me. When point is on a
heading also the other key bindings are just the same as in Org mode.
This was my
Eric S Fraga writes:
> I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to use
> it, especially for emails. I now simply change the mode to org, write
> whatever content I want, and then switch back to message mode to send
> my email. Works fine and gives me the
I agree too, because the OrgStruct mode functions is so limited for basic
Org-mode viewing/editing/navigating etc.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5
One of the reasons I moved to using mu4e for email was because I was
told I could use orgStruct mode and write my email using org structured
editing.
The reality has been somewhat disappointing. One of the main things I
wanted was better handling of lists and this is one area of orgstruct
mode
I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to use it,
especially for emails. I now simply change the mode to org, write
whatever content I want, and then switch back to message mode to send my
email. Works fine and gives me the full power of org.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs
On 08/20/2017 09:57 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base. Here is
> the rationale:
>
I use OrgStruct in my configuration files, but it is so limited that I've been
slowly moving my configuration to Org files. It is frustrating that
I have been using org-mode for a few years now, but have never yet
noticed org-struct mode. So removing org-struct would be no loss for me
(and possibly a gain, if it eased ongoing org-mode maintenance and
development).
OTOH I certainly do use and appreciate orgtbl minor mode, and it would
31 matches
Mail list logo