Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

FYI, I just pushed an update to org-super-agenda that lets you automatically sort agenda items into groups based on an "agenda-group" Org property, which can be set for entire subtrees with inheritance (which is enabled by default). This makes configuration very easy, as you only need one

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

On Saturday, 29 Jul 2017 at 23:11, Adam Porter wrote: > Adam Porter writes: > >>> How do I get un-prioritised TODO entries listed? >> >> I don't have a selector for unprioritized TODO entries...yet. I'll look >> into that. :) > > Silly me, you can already do that, like this:

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

On Saturday, 29 Jul 2017 at 19:41, Adam Porter wrote: >> I guess my challenge is understanding how to specify what I want in >> your super agenda specifications. For instance, how do I get a list >> of tasks with deadlines as a separate entry? > > That's the :deadline selector. Yes, I assumed so

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Adam Porter writes: >> How do I get un-prioritised TODO entries listed? > > I don't have a selector for unprioritized TODO entries...yet. I'll look > into that. :) Silly me, you can already do that, like this: #+BEGIN_SRC (let ((org-agenda-files (list "~/test.org"))

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Adam Porter writes: Hi friend, FYI, this package is now on MELPA, and has had significant changes since I announced it. Please let me know any feedback you may have. Thanks. https://github.com/alphapapa/org-super-agenda

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Hi Eric, Thanks for your email. First off, the package is on MELPA now, and I've added several more features, so feel free to give it a shot. :) > I guess my challenge is understanding how to specify what I want in > your super agenda specifications. For instance, how do I get a list > of

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Hi Adam, thanks for the long email explaining the process and issues. I've updated to latest version. > Well, as it stands, this package is mainly a way to group together items > that the standard agenda view (i.e. the org-agenda-list function) has > gathered. Understood. I guess my challenge

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Adam Porter writes: > After thinking about this some more, I have an idea: if I go ahead and > import the agenda-building functions into my package and modify them, I > can use a minor mode to override the standard functions with advice. > That way users would only have to

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Eric S Fraga writes: > Hi Adam, > > have now given this a try. Looks really nice. Some questions, if I > may. I would like to have the following sections: Hi Eric, Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. > 1. items that have deadlines, any deadline for now and in the future,

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Hi Adam, have now given this a try. Looks really nice. Some questions, if I may. I would like to have the following sections: 1. items that have deadlines, any deadline for now and in the future, whether scheduled or not. 2. items that have a specific TODO type whether scheduled or not. 3.

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Thanks. This also looks rather useful. Will try it out soon (busy with deadlines at the moment and the current agenda view is already good enough to nag me about those ;-)). -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 26.0.50, Org release_9.0.9-573-g09e612 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [O] ANN: org-super-agenda

Seems like the harder I try to be thorough, the more likely I am to mess something up. The instructions for trying it out were slightly incorrect, but they're outdated now, anyway. Please see the repo for current instructions. Thanks.