Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > On Tuesday, 24 Jan 2017 at 14:14, Michael Welle wrote: >> ohschockschwerenot, I found it. I set org-confirm-babel-evaluate to a >> function that does look at the body of the code block and then decides >> if it should be executed without

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

On Tuesday, 24 Jan 2017 at 14:14, Michael Welle wrote: > ohschockschwerenot, I found it. I set org-confirm-babel-evaluate to a > function that does look at the body of the code block and then decides > if it should be executed without confirmation or not. > > I'm not sure, why that is a problem.

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > On Tuesday, 24 Jan 2017 at 10:52, Michael Welle wrote: >> Eric S Fraga writes: >>> Works fine for me with relatively recent org from git. >> that's strange. I pulled last sunday. > > Well, I have just this minute updated and

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, Roger Mason writes: [...] > #+tblname: display-results > | skribilo path | infile | engine| To Engine | To > Typeset | > > |-++---+---+| > | "/opt/skribilo-git/bin" |

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > On Tuesday, 24 Jan 2017 at 10:52, Michael Welle wrote: >> Eric S Fraga writes: >>> Works fine for me with relatively recent org from git. >> that's strange. I pulled last sunday. > > Well, I have just this minute updated and

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

On Tuesday, 24 Jan 2017 at 10:52, Michael Welle wrote: > Eric S Fraga writes: >> Works fine for me with relatively recent org from git. > that's strange. I pulled last sunday. Well, I have just this minute updated and tried again. It still works for me. -- : Eric S Fraga

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > On Monday, 23 Jan 2017 at 12:04, Michael Welle wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I think there are several problems, starting with BEGIN_SRC sh and some >> more. But fixing them doesn't bring success. I even have trouble to get >> a minimal example to work:

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, Michael Welle writes: ... > #+NAME: foo > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp > > (+ 4 4) > #+END_SRC > > > | bar | foo| > |+| > | 42 | #ERROR | > > #+TBLFM: $2='(org-sbe "foo")::$1=42 > > I'm not sure, what the problem is. Looking at org-sbe there is >

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello Roland and Michael, Thank you both for looking at this. Roland Everaert writes: > I will try to look at how I used org-sbe, but I do remind that I had to do > the following (exerpt from a post on > the list by me on the same subjet): > > "It works. But I had to set

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > On Monday, 23 Jan 2017 at 12:04, Michael Welle wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I think there are several problems, starting with BEGIN_SRC sh and some >> more. But fixing them doesn't bring success. I even have trouble to get >> a minimal example to work:

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

On Monday, 23 Jan 2017 at 12:04, Michael Welle wrote: > Hello, > > I think there are several problems, starting with BEGIN_SRC sh and some > more. But fixing them doesn't bring success. I even have trouble to get > a minimal example to work: > > #+NAME: foo > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp > (+ 4 4) >

Re: [O] Table formula from code block

Hello, I think there are several problems, starting with BEGIN_SRC sh and some more. But fixing them doesn't bring success. I even have trouble to get a minimal example to work: #+NAME: foo #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (+ 4 4) #+END_SRC | bar | foo| |+| | 42 | #ERROR |