Updated patch attached.
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Nathaniel Flath writes:
Sory for the long delay - I got caught up in other work. A
patchaddressing the sisues brought up is attached.
I've had a look at
Hello,
Nathaniel Flath writes:
Sory for the long delay - I got caught up in other work. A
patchaddressing the sisues brought up is attached.
I've had a look at your patch.
I think the modifications to HTML and DocBook exporters are nice. It
could be possible to do the same thing in LaTeX,
Sory for the long delay - I got caught up in other work.
A patchaddressing the sisues brought up is attached.
Let me know of anything else.
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Nathaniel Flath flat0...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on your comments, should have another
I'm working on your comments, should have another patch in the next day or so.
The only thing I had issue with was the comment about
org-item-beginning-re: I prefer it as a function for the reasons you
mention, but I'm not particularly attached to this. Does anyone else
have an opinion?
Nathaniel Flath flat0...@gmail.com writes:
Let me know if there's anything else, or if I screwed up anything
when trying to figure out how to make a git patch(looks like it
worked, though.)
From 3b46feec08ec4c93f098dbdc6a4590f95afc0e68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: unknown nfl...@.(none)
I think I've fixed these, although I'm not an expert in the exporting.
Let me know if there's anything else, or if I screwed up anything
when trying to figure out how to make a git patch(looks like it
worked, though.)
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Nicolas Goaziou
Hello,
Nathaniel Flath writes:
Are there any further issues?
Also, as you changed `org-item-beginning-re' into a function, there
are a few places outside org-list.el that need to be modified
accordingly.
And exporters (mainly HTML and DocBook) should be aware of
alphabetical bullets.
Hello,
Nathaniel Flath writes:
Are there any further issues? Thanks, Nathaniel Flath
I've quick checked your patch and it looks like it is doing its job.
Two things to note, though:
1. I strongly recommend that `org-list-can-be-alphabetical' should
make use of non-interactive forms
Are there any further issues?
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Nathaniel Flath flat0...@gmail.com wrote:
New patch fixing these issues is attached.
Let me know of any other problems.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Carsten Dominik
carsten.domi...@gmail.com wrote:
New patch fixing these issues is attached.
Let me know of any other problems.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Carsten Dominik
carsten.domi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Nathaniel Flath writes:
I think I've fixed the issues brought up
On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Nathaniel Flath writes:
I think I've fixed the issues brought up with this new patch. Please
let me know what you think.
I've noticed a couple of glitches.
First, you are using
( 28 (length struct))
to know when to replace
Hello,
Nathaniel Flath writes:
I think I've fixed the issues brought up with this new patch. Please
let me know what you think.
I've noticed a couple of glitches.
First, you are using
( 28 (length struct))
to know when to replace letters by numbers. But (length struct)
doesn't always
Hi Nathaniel,
I get patch does not apply. Can you please update the patch to the
current git master?
Thanks
- Carsten
On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Nathaniel Flath wrote:
I think I've fixed the issues brought up with this new patch. Please
let me know what you think.
On Wed, Oct 20,
Sorry about that - patch attached.
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Carsten Dominik
carsten.domi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nathaniel,
I get patch does not apply. Can you please update the patch to the
current git master?
Thanks
- Carsten
On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:30
I think I've fixed the issues brought up with this new patch. Please
let me know what you think.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathaniel Flath flat0...@gmail.com wrote:
But I can't help thinking this could lead to unexpected results in
some cases (admittedly less than when alpha bullets
But I can't help thinking this could lead to unexpected results in
some cases (admittedly less than when alpha bullets could be any size
long).
It definitely will.
Here is an alternative idea. Nathaniel, what do you
think about this: We could keep the numbering as we
have it in the Org
On Oct 4, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
I think it would be appropriate in this case to simply throw an
error and let the user clean up with undo.
Certainly, but this still means that any 27+ items list will never be
able to complete a full bullet cycle
On Oct 1, 2010, at 3:13 AM, Nathaniel Flath wrote:
Carsten,
If you think this is acceptable I'll start working on it.
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Nicolas Goaziou
n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
Or, alternatively, put it in with
Carsten Dominik writes:
I think it would be appropriate in this case to simply throw an
error and let the user clean up with undo.
Certainly, but this still means that any 27+ items list will never be
able to complete a full bullet cycle as the user will have to undo
each time alphabetical
Sorry for not following this thread closely.
But from what I read, I thought it might be better to have a _command_
to sort existing lists alphabetically?
That way, there is nothing that has to be turned on globally, that
could intefere with Org mode's syntax.
Excuse me, if that's of topic or
I don't think this is what I had in mind. What you suggest seems to
apply for bulleted lists, and sorting the titles of those
alphabetically. I'm trying to implement lists of the form:
a. Item 1
b. Item 2
c. Item 3
That work the same as lists like:
1. Item 1
2. Item 2
3.
Carsten,
If you think this is acceptable I'll start working on it.
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
Or, alternatively, put it in with an option to turn it on (default
off, I think). And maybe
On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:12 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Nathaniel Flath writes:
But, there is apparently one major drawback, as I said in a
previous post. If the line starts with a word followed by a dot or
a parenthesis, Org will see a
I'd be fine with either (or both) of these, and can code it up once we
decide. I find it unlikely that I'd use an alphabetical list of size
more than 26, which is why I only had one character to begin with.
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Carsten Dominik
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
Or, alternatively, put it in with an option to turn it on (default
off, I think). And maybe we should after all limit it to a single
character to avoid confusion. Yes, I do realise that I asked for
several characters - but I am learning...
What will then
Nathaniel Flath writes:
But, there is apparently one major drawback, as I said in a
previous post. If the line starts with a word followed by a dot or
a parenthesis, Org will see a bullet there. This is bad news
because the following line will be indented, or a M-RET will delete
the word,
Hello,
I've tried the patch today. There are still some easily-fixed glitches
(like letters not included in org-cycle-list-bullet, or bullets
allowing mixed text and numbers).
But, there is apparently one major drawback, as I said in a previous
post. If the line starts with a word followed by a
But, there is apparently one major drawback, as I said in a previous
post. If the line starts with a word followed by a dot or a
parenthesis, Org will see a bullet there. This is bad news because the
following line will be indented, or a M-RET will delete the word,
replacing it with a) or a.
Hi everyone,
I would like to know if there are more people interested in this, and
if there are people who are willing to test this patch, to make sure
nothing breaks.
Nicolas, can you in particular please take a look at this - I believe
you earlier said that you saw problems with it.
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
Nicolas, can you in particular please take a look at this - I
believe you earlier said that you saw problems with it.
Sure, I will have a look at it on Sunday. But before testing it, there
is, by design, one thing that seems dangerous to me. Let's consider
the
Hey,
I gave another shot at this, now that my computer is no longer dead.
I believe it fixes the issues described earlier - let me know of any
feedback.
(Also - I don't know how to get GMail to attach this as anything other
than application/octet-stream, so the text is in the message as well.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:27 PM, Nathaniel Flath wrote:
Hello all,
One thing that had been bugging me was the inability to have an
ordered list of the form:
a.
I was going to fix the issues described in the first reply - not
enough items in particular - and resubmit soon. I got a bit
distracted by finals. I'll see if I can figure out the export
problem, as well.
Thanks,
Nathaniel Flath
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Jacob Mitchell
33 matches
Mail list logo
