On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:54 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> + (aset org-indent-strings 0 nil)
> + (aset org-indent-stars 0 nil)
>
That did it! I was in the middle of writing an apologetic email
explaining that it hadn't worked in either snapshot or 23.1, but then
remembered I had to run 'make
Hi Matt,
can you please try the following patch?
---
diff --git a/lisp/org-indent.el b/lisp/org-indent.el
index afce59f..53db9be 100644
--- a/lisp/org-indent.el
+++ b/lisp/org-indent.el
@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ this variable
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Matt Price wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 08:28 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Matt,
personally, I never use visual-line-mode, mainly because cursor
motion
becomes unpredictable to me (down doe not get me into the next line,
so for example keyboard macros are
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 08:28 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> personally, I never use visual-line-mode, mainly because cursor motion
> becomes unpredictable to me (down doe not get me into the next line,
> so for example keyboard macros are much harder to make to consistently).
>
On Nov 20, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Matt Price wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:33 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Matt Price writes:
Visual-line-mode is a replacement for longlines-mode; it soft-wraps
text at the screen boundary, and does a much better job than
longlines-mode did.
I think you're confus
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:33 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Matt Price writes:
>
> > Visual-line-mode is a replacement for longlines-mode; it soft-wraps
> > text at the screen boundary, and does a much better job than
> > longlines-mode did.
>
> I think you're confused by a (helpful) conflation.
>
>
