On Tuesday, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:01, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Don’t you get a "do you want to revert file" warning then?
You might not be visiting that file and/or you might have auto-revert
mode set (which I do as I like living dangerously ;-)).
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org r
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Tuesday, 13 Oct 2020 at 09:27, Greg Minshall wrote:
>> yes, but. the first time i 'C-c C-v t' in the base file onto a
>> changed-but-uncommitted tangled file, even git will provide me no
>> succor.
>
> True. :-(
Don’t you get a "do you want to revert file" warning th
On Tuesday, 13 Oct 2020 at 09:27, Greg Minshall wrote:
> yes, but. the first time i 'C-c C-v t' in the base file onto a
> changed-but-uncommitted tangled file, even git will provide me no
> succor.
True. :-(
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4-57-g8402c4
On Monday, 12 Oct 2020 at 20:52, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Do you use org-mode to document stuff after you wrote it?
Before, during, and after!
> I often use it to start small tools that I need right now — for example
I do as well. I have little snippets of code and data throughout my
Eric,
> But that's what git etc. are for! ;-)
yes, but. the first time i 'C-c C-v t' in the base file onto a
changed-but-uncommitted tangled file, even git will provide me no
succor.
cheers, Greg
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Monday, 12 Oct 2020 at 18:33, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> That’s also when I tangle — but I often don’t move the code back into
>> org afterwards, because once I needed this support once, I know I’ll
>> need it again.
>
> Interesting. I guess my needs are diffe
On Monday, 12 Oct 2020 at 18:33, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> That’s also when I tangle — but I often don’t move the code back into
> org afterwards, because once I needed this support once, I know I’ll
> need it again.
Interesting. I guess my needs are different: I need these support tools
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Monday, 12 Oct 2020 at 15:39, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Did you find a way to make flycheck or flymake work in the src-buffers?
>
> This is an example of when I use tangling/detangling: when I need this
> kind of support to develop my code.
That’s also when I
On Monday, 12 Oct 2020 at 17:17, Greg Minshall wrote:
> making changes in both the base file source block and in the Org
> Src... buffer (which i assume the de-tangling solution can't?).
Yes, de-tangling cannot handle such simultaneous changes so you do need
to be careful. But that's what git e
On Monday, 12 Oct 2020 at 15:39, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Did you find a way to make flycheck or flymake work in the src-buffers?
This is an example of when I use tangling/detangling: when I need this
kind of support to develop my code.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_
Eric,
thanks. de-tangling sounds like a possible solution. though, at least
with Org Src ... buffers, org/emacs mostly keep me from messing up by,
e.g., making changes in both the base file source block and in the Org
Src... buffer (which i assume the de-tangling solution can't?). given
my agin
Arne,
no, sorry, i don't use either flymake or flycheck.
cheers, Greg
Greg Minshall writes:
> ps -- in case it's of interest: possibly i'm frustrated now, and wasn't
> so much in the past, as i recently got annoyed by having to go back to
> the base file to save and tangle (part of my work flow, to test whatever
> i'm working on), and, so, wrote a few lines of emac
On Monday, 12 Oct 2020 at 15:44, Greg Minshall wrote:
> in *my* case (with the project i'm currently working on), each source
> block in the .org file is a separately tangled file, and each source
> block could be tagged with a distinct '#+name:' value.
Using the name of the src block would be a n
14 matches
Mail list logo
