Ihor Radchenko writes on Sat 11 Feb 2023 18:22:
> We can indeed at such warning, but it will probably be not very
> helpful.
I don't understand this. And isn't it better to have a more accurate
manual anyway?
Apart from that, since the default value in 9.6 is 'smart' ('nil' in
9.5), I wonder
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> At any rate, shouldn't "2.2.3 Catching invisible edits" be a little
> bit more specific about what kind of invisible edits are concerned?
> Or perhaps just a warning that it is not all of them.
We can indeed at such warning, but it will probably be not very
Ihor Radchenko writes on Fri 10 Feb 2023 09:56:
> Only a handful of interactive commands support invisible edit
> checks. In particular: self-insert-command (typing), deleting char
> forward/backward, and `org-meta-return'.
>
> I guess we may instead provide a defcustom and hook the check
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
>M-x undo
>
> I visually see no change, but I can observe by unfolding the headline
> that 'bar' has disappeared. In my understanding of the documentation
> above and of the docstring for org-fold-catch-invisible-edits, this
> should only happen with 'nil'.
>
