Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Let's first try to report and see what the reply is.
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63800
This is now semi-fixed on ELPA. Not for Org mode, but for other built-in
packages. Org mode in particular is not (yet). See
Max Nikulin writes:
>> The first instance of M-x package-install org comes from
>> ELPA itself. Considering that ELPA is targeting various Emacs versions,
>> it should probably be corrected there first.
>
> Generally agree, but I am skeptical concerning changes in ELPA since
> only minority
On 26/05/2023 15:23, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
I have realized that the command is specified in the README.org file, so
it is mentioned twice on https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/org.html
However prior to Emacs-29.1 built-in packages are filtered-out from
completion list and
Max Nikulin writes:
> I have realized that the command is specified in the README.org file, so
> it is mentioned twice on https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/org.html
> However prior to Emacs-29.1 built-in packages are filtered-out from
> completion list and ignored by non-interactive command
>
>
On 13/11/2021 12:39, Carlos Pita wrote:
in a clean emacs-28 install I do:
M-x package-install org
I get:
Possible completions are:
org-contrib org-edna org-real org-translate orgalist
I have realized that the command is specified in the README.org file, so
it is
This might be because the builtin version is the same as the one in
elpa (although if that's the case the UI is somewhat confusing) but
I'm not sure about that because I don't quite understand the
relationship between builtin versions and stable external releases. I
mean, is builtin org only
Hi all,
in a clean emacs-28 install I do:
M-x package-install org
I get:
Possible completions are:
org-contrib org-edna org-real org-translate orgalist
package-archives has:
(("gnu" . "https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/;)
("nongnu" . "https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/;))
