Hi!
Having a TODO which depends on an earlier TODO I would like to trigger the
timestamped scheduling of
the following TODO when the former is DONE.
How do you folks handle such dependencies?
Could any automatic process be implemented?
* TODO job 1
SCHEDULED: 2007-10-12 Fr
* TODO job 2
On Oct 8, 2007, at 0:23, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Hi,
The agenda timeline view does not show any SCHEDULED todo items, but
does show items with an plain active time stamp without preceding
SCHEDULED. Is that a bug or by design? If that is by design, what is
the rationale here? Thanks a lot for
On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:14, John Wiegley wrote:
Ok, I have 147k of archived todos and notes now. Some are tagged,
some are
not. Most have an ARCHIVE_CATEGORY property (ever since Carsten so
kindly
implemented it).
My desire: To hit C-u C-c \ and have it prompt me for the entity its
going
On Oct 7, 2007, at 14:27, Bastien wrote:
If Carsten implements this, I think all the search facilities in Org
will need a bit of uniformization/clarification.
Admittedly the search functions are one of the areas that
demonstrate most clearly how Org-mode has grown and evolved, adding
little
John Wiegley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Search for a regexp
2. Search for a complex query
3. Prompt interactively for a complex query
4. Show all tagged entries
5. Prompt for a specific tag
6. Prompt for a specific tag (restricting to TODO entries)
7.
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a first attempt at such a function, comments are welcome!
Maybe we should bind this function to `C-c /', instead of org-occur?
Yes, this binding would be okay, unless there are lots of people using
org-occur out there.
And `org-sparse-tree'
applied, thanks.
- Carsten
On Oct 6, 2007, at 22:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
This tiny patch (against org version 5.10b, i didnt found a suitable
CVS repository to get non-released code) fixes `org-store-link' for
wanderlust summary mode.
In both the latest wanderlust version
On Oct 8, 2007, at 14:39, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arrrgh!
make that (org-buffer-property-keys t) for now, bug fix in next
release.
This patch is also needed:
Indeed, thanks a lot. So to make this simpler, here is
the modified version that should work
On 10/8/07, Rainer Stengele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Having a TODO which depends on an earlier TODO I would like to trigger the
timestamped scheduling of
the following TODO when the former is DONE.
I second this request. I often like to schedule a workflow where task
A must precede B
I know I'm replying to myself, but I had an idea.
If a link could show the state of a linked TODO, that would make for a
good visualization. I could then follow the link and just adjust my
order to account for dependencies. It sounds like a more permanent
agenda view that you could edit to get
I've been waiting to see if org might develop something like todo
dependency ordering. Seems like one could use this with and estimated
time to complete a todo item to generate a milestone table or more
easily estimate how long a group of tasks will require to complete or
when the soonest a
On Oct 7, 2007, at 14:27, Bastien wrote:
If Carsten implements this, I think all the search facilities in Org
will need a bit of uniformization/clarification.
Admittedly the search functions are one of the areas that
demonstrate most clearly how Org-mode has grown and evolved,
adding little
On Oct 7, 2007, at 17:25, Robert Miesen wrote:
==BEGIN BUG REPORT==
I attempted to mark a task with the REPEAT timestamp as 'DONE' using
'C-c C-t'
and instead of the schedule timestamp for the task being moved
according to the
value within REPEAT() (ex.--- REPEAT(+1w)), it
Hi Fabian,
properties are currently *not* inherited, at least in general they are
not. This would cause a large overhead in searching.
Having said that, I do use inheritance for a couple of special
properties, so your expectation is not surprising. Maybe I
should allow inheritance with a
On Oct 6, 2007, at 9:46, Maxim Loginov wrote:
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 13:54, Maxim Loginov wrote:
is there any mechanism to untag subtree?
No, that is not possible. As a work-around, can create an
additonal tag nopython and then craft your search
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why do you think this is better?
Because if I am on a thursday and I go a week forward or backward it
makes more sense to still be on a thursday IMO. Just a gut feeling and
how it works on pretty much any calendar app I have used. No big thing I
grant
Hi there,
I start to export org to icalendar and then to google calendar. I wonder
what's the best way to include the LOCATION.
Thanks,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :.
Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:25:00 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not yet used this feature, but I am working with html/css all
day, so here is my opinion:
1. You shouldn't use more divs than you need to, and you don't need
them.
Why (I'm sure there's a good reason)?
2. You shouldn't
Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- if A changes to DONE, change B from BLOCKED to NEXT
(this is the obvious one)
- if A changes to DONE, change B from NEXT to CANCELLED
(if only A or B needs to be done, not both)
There must be others people can think of easily.
Updating
Eddward DeVilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My only real issue is that I tend to think of task dependencies in
terms of the other tasks a given task is waiting on rather than what
other tasks are waiting on a given task.
Ok, then:
* Task A
* Task B
:PROPERTIES:
:TODO: {TODO 'previous
Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I start to export org to icalendar and then to google calendar. I
wonder what's the best way to include the LOCATION.
What do you exactly mean by include the LOCATION?
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
On 10/8/07, John Wiegley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about just having generalized Lisp triggers:
[snip]
This could be dangerous. Org file are (most) text. The more code you
allow to be embedded, the more of a vector org-mode becomes for trojan
horse attacks. Of course I've been using lisp
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:35:33PM -0500, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
On 10/8/07, Russell Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In projects, my sections are
- quick info -- a table with things like defect or request
tracking info, start date, estimated time, date testing begins and
date actually
23 matches
Mail list logo
