I was bitten by this and it took me a while to figure out what was going
on, so maybe I can save somebody some time by recording the problem here.
I'm using bbdb 2.36devo (i.e. an old bbdb version - see below for my
3.0 troubles), and although org-bbdb-anniversaries was working fine,
bbdb links
Hi Dave,
At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000,
Dave Abrahams wrote:
[1 text/plain (7bit)]
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
The backtrace is along the expected lines. The zip command is failing
for some reason.
Did you look at the *Messages* buffer? It is likely to give some clue on
why the zip command is failing.
Btw, if you have cvd-modeling-proposal.odt already open in an external
application like LibreOffice,
on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus dmaus-AT-ictsoc.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000,
Dave Abrahams wrote:
[1 text/plain (7bit)]
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report?
At Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:34:22 -0500,
Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus dmaus-AT-ictsoc.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000,
Dave Abrahams wrote:
[1 text/plain (7bit)]
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
Hello Jambunathan,
I do not have the odt document open.
From the *Message* buffer, it seems that zip is looking for the odt file in
c:\Users\...\AppData\Temp\..., but the file is not present
In the org-odt-save-as-outfile let* block from which the error is thrown
(let* ((target-name)
Applied, Thanks!
Andreas Leha andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de writes:
Hi all,
attached is a patch that enhances org-babel-goto-named-src-block (bound
to C-c C-v g by default). Included are two enhancements:
1. the point is pushed to the org-mark-ring, such that returning with
C-c
Kyle Andrews kcand...@mtu.edu writes:
I am having both of these issues on Emacs 24. Emacs crashes sometimes on
geiser and babel won't evaluate scheme code as Racket code despite setting
'scheme-program-name and 'org-babel-scheme-cmd to racket. However, Guile
will work if both of those
Applied, Thanks!
Viktor Rosenfeld listuse...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi,
the attached patch adds support for evaluating SQL blocks on MonetDB.
The MonetDB client normally requires the password to be inputted on the
console. To get around this, you have to use a dotfile ~/.monetdb with
Hi Thorsten,
This page looks great, thanks for contributing! Hopefully this will
lower the barrier of entry for both Org-mode code blocks and Picolisp.
Chers,
Thorsten quintf...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi List,
I added the documentation page for the org babel language picolisp to
worg. You
Hello Jambunathan,
I do not have the odt document open.
Ok.
From the *Message* buffer, it seems that zip is looking for the odt file in
c:\Users\...\AppData\Temp\..., but the file is not present
,
| Creating odt file...
| Running zip -mX0 org-odt-export.odt mimetype
| zip warning:
Hi Ista,
Use the :no-expand header argument. See
http://orgmode.org/manual/no_002dexpand.html
Best,
Ista Zahn istaz...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
Is there a way to tangle just the body of code blocks, without any header
argurments? For example when I tangle this file
# begin example
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
(setq temporary-file-directory ~/tmp/)
You can see how it is set on my Windows XP machine. Basically it some
directory under my My Documents path.
I never had any problems with this setup.
,[ C-h v temporary-file-directory RET ]
|
Commit 00040e7 by David Maus has introduced a regression when inserting
into org tables while overwrite mode is on. For each character inserted
into a table cell, the cell (and the whole table row) gets shortened by
one character.
If the change can not be reverted, the deletion must not
happen
Hi,
Viktor Rosenfeld listuse...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
Viktor Rosenfeld listuse...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi Eric,
thanks for your input. I just pulled the latest code from git and while
my original example works, the following does not:
on Sat Feb 25 2012, Dave Abrahams dave-AT-boostpro.com wrote:
on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus dmaus-AT-ictsoc.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000,
Dave Abrahams wrote:
[1 text/plain (7bit)]
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what
The problem was fixed by changing temporary-file-directory from
c:\Users\...\AppData\Local\Temp to ~/temp/
I am running windows 7. The environment variables TEMP TMP both
point to c:\Users\...\AppData\Local\Temp.
I guess that zip/unzip were running in the ~/temp directory, while the
files
On Sat, Feb 25 2012, Nick Dokos wrote:
A quick first impression: orgntf-process seems expensive. It seems
to take 100% of one core (I've got a quad-core processor) for three or
four seconds every fifty seconds. Unfortunately, the core is the same one
that's running emacs, so emacs stops
It occurs from time to time that I wish to refile to an open file, that
is not one of my org-refile-targets. It doesn't make sense to use
org-agenda-files for refile targets since I might have other files open
for various reasons. So I thought, why not either declare that any open
file is a
Hello, all Org friends.
Here is a need I have once in a while, but for which I do not even have
realistic suggestions to offer (at least, so I feel). Maybe someone
would offer more precise ideas. :-)
When I have a big Org file which I want to re-organize, one of the
criteria I use is to manage
Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25 2012, Nick Dokos wrote:
A quick first impression: orgntf-process seems expensive. It seems
to take 100% of one core (I've got a quad-core processor) for three or
four seconds every fifty seconds. Unfortunately, the core is the same one
Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25 2012, Nick Dokos wrote:
A quick first impression: orgntf-process seems expensive. It seems
to take 100% of one core (I've got a quad-core processor) for three or
four seconds every fifty seconds. Unfortunately, the core is the same one
22 matches
Mail list logo