Hi Bhastien, ;)
thanks for the pointer. Indeed this does much of the idea I had already.
A few points which might be add
* If called with a region marked, this region could be put into the
mail. That is mark the "defect" region and call
`org-submit-bug-report' and you are almost done with your re
Achim Gratz writes:
> Am 08.04.2012 13:43, schrieb Karl Voit:
>
>> Mailinglists - though currently handled by gmane which is also a
>> company - are a standard that is independent from any company. You
>> can extract the complete archive if you want and host it somewhere
>> else. No fuzz here.
>
Hi all,
there is no plan for changing the role and usage of the mailing
list. This role and usage are in *our* hands.
The idea behind a lightweight commenting system is not to split
discussion areas, but to gather non-permanent feedback, to help
spot small typos, etc.
If worgers think commen
Eric Schulte writes:
> Torsten Wagner writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for me the biggest "trouble" with babel is to remember the possible
>> keywords in the header for different languages.
>> There were a lot of ongoing syntax change which did not make it easier
>> for me to remember all this.
>> Thus a
Have you got:
(org-babel-do-load-languages
'org-babel-load-languages
'((R . t)
(ditaa . t)
(dot . t)
(emacs-lisp . t)
(gnuplot . t)
(haskell . nil)
(latex . t)
(ledger . t)
(ocaml . nil)
(octave . t)
(python . t)
(ruby . t)
(screen . nil)
(sh . t)
(sql
On 8 Apr 2012 13:44, "Karl Voit"
> Oh I'd like to warn here: disqus is a private commercial company
> that wants to make money.
>
> Their strategy can (and will) change from one day to the other.
An enthusiastic +1 from this largely lurking list member.
Best,
Brian vdB
On 08/04/12 05:06, Alexandros Bantis wrote:
Hello all,
Hoping someone might be help me diagnose this problem. I recently
changed my linux distro from ubuntu to arch linux. I had an org-file
that was running very well (over a year) up until the switch over. I
have monthly entries separated into s
François Allisson writes:
> Hello worgers,
>
> I've noticed that all links to raw files (.el) on
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/index.html are broken. They used
> to be pointers to repo.or.cz. The attached patch reactivates these
> links with pointers to the new orgmode.org git repository.
Julian Gehring writes:
> From 40344d3dd27af520ba09516b72e6cbb06a37e780 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julian Gehring
> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:24:47 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] org.texi: Fix missing links and formatting in 'Exporting'
> section
Hi Julian,
Why is the last hunk in this patch us
At Sat, 7 Apr 2012 21:22:59 +0200,
Michael Brand wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 17:59, James Harkins wrote:
> > How to make a TODO agenda search that will show only #A priority items? (Or
> > #B or #C?)
> > I see in the manual how to search on tags or properties, but not priorities.
>
> The man
>From 40344d3dd27af520ba09516b72e6cbb06a37e780 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Gehring
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:24:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] org.texi: Fix missing links and formatting in 'Exporting'
section
---
doc/org.texi | 25 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(
Am 08.04.2012 13:43, schrieb Karl Voit:
Mailinglists - though currently handled by gmane which is also a
company - are a standard that is independent from any company. You
can extract the complete archive if you want and host it somewhere
else. No fuzz here.
Gmane is not a company:
http://gman
* John Hendy wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2012 4:28 AM, "Bastien" wrote:
>>
>> The question now is: on what Worg pages should we have this
>> comment system?
>
> True. And how to balance the mailing list vs disqus... While thw mailing
> list is great, sometimes for the life of me I can't find a discussio
Hello worgers,
I've noticed that all links to raw files (.el) on
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/index.html are broken. They used
to be pointers to repo.or.cz. The attached patch reactivates these
links with pointers to the new orgmode.org git repository.
This is my first patch (not to worg,
Hello,
oitofe...@gmail.com (Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro) writes:
>Consider the following org code:
>
>--
>* Headline 1
> This is only a text.[fn:1]
>
>[fn:1] This is a footnote.
>
>* Headline 2
> This is another text.[fn:2]
>
>[fn:2] This is another footnote.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo