[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

> The more general problem is when there's at least one more > sub-expression, whose start and/or end are after the new EOB. > Those sub-expression's data will be completely bogus after the > adjustment, If they were after the EOB, they were already bogus to start with. So there's really not much

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

> From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Robert Pluim , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, > alex.ben...@linaro.org, jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:58:35 -0400 > > > In the case in point, a single character at EOB (= 62) was deleted, > > which made EOB be 61, one less than its

[O] how to update and add info to babel documentation?

hi there, I was trying to find the sources for the babel language documentation. Specifically: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-sqlite.html Could anybody please tell me which is the best way to submit a patch to it? Specifically, I would like to document the use of va

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

> In the case in point, a single character at EOB (= 62) was deleted, > which made EOB be 61, one less than its previous value. When > save-match-data was called from within a hook set up by Org, it tried > to record the end of the sub-expression as 62, but set-marker silently > changed that to 61

Re: [O] links-9.0 v3

Sounds good. Thanks for your patience, I learned a lot doing this! I look forward to using it in the wild ;) Nicolas Goaziou writes: > John Kitchin writes: > >> Ok. I have attached 20 patches with the updates below. > > Applied, with minor tweaks (trailing white spaces and too wide lines). > Tha

Re: [O] links-9.0 v3

John Kitchin writes: > Ok. I have attached 20 patches with the updates below. Applied, with minor tweaks (trailing white spaces and too wide lines). Thank you for all this work. Ultimately, I removed `org--open-file-link' altogether since default behaviour for file+apps links DTRT. I also start

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

+1 for org 9.0 in master. On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:36 PM Rasmus wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > >> I would suggest that you push the latest maint branch org version to the > >> master branch of emacs now, so that it would be fairly tested by the > time > >> the next to next emacs release

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> I would suggest that you push the latest maint branch org version to the >> master branch of emacs now, so that it would be fairly tested by the time >> the next to next emacs release happens (25.2?). > > My secret plan is to have Org 9.0 merged in Emacs master branch j

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

Kaushal Modi writes: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM Nicolas Goaziou > wrote: > >> I'm fairly surprised about this answer because we have been repeatedly >> asking for an update, and they refused every time. >> >> Org 8.3 was meant to be included in Emacs 25 and it was released about >> one y

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

Kaushal Modi writes: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:55 AM Rasmus wrote: > >> nljlistb...@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: >> >> Org 8.3.4 will be part of Emacs 25.1. Maybe Org 8.4 will be part of Emacs >> 25.2. >> > > How does that work? emacs 25.1 is already in the final versions of pretests > and

[O] Question about archiving

There seems to be three different ways to archive entries. 1. Set archive property on item 2. Move to archive sibling 3. Move to archive file Can someone explain the difference, and what the pros/cons are of using each? Thanks! Tom

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

At 19:49 +0200 on Monday 2016-07-18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > My secret plan is to have Org 9.0 merged in Emacs master branch just > after Emacs 25.1 is released. The effectiveness of this strategy might depend upon whether Emacs 25.2 is cut from what is now the Emacs master branch or from the e

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

> From: John Wiegley > Cc: Robert Pluim , Stefan Monnier > , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, alex.ben...@linaro.org, > nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:04:11 -0700 > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > My suggestion to fix this is below. I ask for opinions on (1) whether this > >

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

> Eli Zaretskii writes: > My suggestion to fix this is below. I ask for opinions on (1) whether this > looks like TRT, (2) whether it is safe enough for emacs-25, and (3) whether > someone has better ideas. I didn't even know match-data took arguments, so I defer to your judgment on this iss

Re: [O] Customizing todo state for habits

> "CL" == Clarissa Littler writes: CL> the default behavior of habits seems to be to, when completed, CL> to revert the state to the first todo keyword in your listing CL> but I want to have different todo states for different habits CL> depending on the /kind/ of task it is.

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

> From: Robert Pluim > CC: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Bennée > , jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:24:59 +0200 > > (I'm moving this discussion to the bug, let me know if that's not OK) Thanks. > Make sure that you have org-20160704 from elpa. > > # emacs -

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

Hello, Kaushal Modi writes: > There's miscommunication between the emacs-devel and emacs-orgmode mailing > lists. Probably. > I would suggest that you push the latest maint branch org version to the > master branch of emacs now, so that it would be fairly tested by the time > the next to next

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

On Monday, 18 Jul 2016 at 14:50, Kaushal Modi wrote: > @Eric Would it be possible for you to provide a recipe to recreate > this issue from an emacs -Q session? With emacs-snapshot (aka 25.0.95.1), and the following emacs-minimal.el file: --8<---cut here---start---

Re: [O] links-9.0 v3

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > John Kitchin writes: > >> I am not sure what you mean for this. Let me know if it isn't fixed in >> the attached patches. I thought I had squashed everything into a concise >> history. > > No worries. Let's just apply the 21 patches. Ok. I have attached 20 patches with

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I'm fairly surprised about this answer because we have been repeatedly > asking for an update, and they refused every time. > > Org 8.3 was meant to be included in Emacs 25 and it was released about > one year ago. > There's miscommunicat

Re: [O] links-9.0 v3

John Kitchin writes: > I am not sure what you mean for this. Let me know if it isn't fixed in > the attached patches. I thought I had squashed everything into a concise > history. No worries. Let's just apply the 21 patches. > I think this code below (which should be in the patches) handles the

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:55 AM Rasmus wrote: > nljlistb...@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > > Org 8.3.4 will be part of Emacs 25.1. Maybe Org 8.4 will be part of Emacs > 25.2. > How does that work? emacs 25.1 is already in the final versions of pretests and the it still has org version 8.2.10

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

Hello, nljlistb...@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > I'm wondering if there will be an updated version of Org Mode > bundled with Emacs 25? No, AFAICT Org mode will not be updated. > (I asked this question on the Emacs developers' list and they > suggested [1] that I ask the Org Mode developers.

Re: [O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

nljlistb...@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > I'm wondering if there will be an updated version of Org Mode > bundled with Emacs 25? Org 8.3.4 will be part of Emacs 25.1. Maybe Org 8.4 will be part of Emacs 25.2. -- Evidence suggests Snowden used a powerful tool called monospaced fonts

[O] Will there be an updated Org Mode in Emacs 25?

Hello Org Mode developers, I'm wondering if there will be an updated version of Org Mode bundled with Emacs 25? In the tarball for the most recent pre-release version (25.0.95) the bundled Org Mode is 8.2.10. This is the same version that was bundled with Emacs 24.5 15 months ago or so, and presu

Re: [O] links-9.0 v3

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > John Kitchin writes: > >> Here are my current suggestions for the org-link 9.0. > > Thank you. I think I fixed the points you made in the previous email. > >> Let me know what the best way to send these might be. It looks like it >> might be 21 patches righ

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

I use org-capture heavily, but I do not use a template that causes this issue. This issue was posted once again today on the org mailing list and I would vote for this to be made a blocking bug too. One useful update we get from Eric Fraga ( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/108289 ) is

Re: [O] error in capture

On Monday, 18 Jul 2016 at 13:31, Aaron Ecay wrote: > Hi Eric, > > It’s a known bug in recent versions of org and/or emacs. No one knows > exactly what triggers the problem yet, and it’s being discussed in the > emacs bug tracker . Thanks. I ha

Re: [O] error in capture

Hi Eric, It’s a known bug in recent versions of org and/or emacs. No one knows exactly what triggers the problem yet, and it’s being discussed in the emacs bug tracker . -- Aaron Ecay

[O] error in capture

Hello, I have just updated my org from git (because I also updated Emacs) and now get this error when trying to capture: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Capture template ‘t’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks") signal(error ("Capture template ‘t’: Match data clobbered by

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

(I'm moving this discussion to the bug, let me know if that's not OK) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Alex Bennée >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "N. Jackson" , >> emacs-de...@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 18:28:36 +0100 >> >> I've just uninstalled the ELPA installed org and run into the same >> pr

Re: [O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

Hello, Sharon Kimble writes: > What I've done has been to split the cancer file up into 2, cancer.org > being 445k, and cancer-1.org being 544k. I initially had misgivings > about it with regard to footnotes, but they seem to be working okay, and > both files are now very easy to add to and also

Re: [O] links-9.0 v3

John Kitchin writes: > What do you think of this approach: > > (defcustom org-link-parameters > - '(("file" :complete 'org-file-complete-link) > -("file+emacs" :follow (lambda (path) (org-open-file path '(4 > -("file+sys" :follow (lambda (path) (org-open-file path 'system))) > + '

Re: [O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Sharon Kimble writes: > >> I'm working on an org-mode file about cancer which is 945.1kb, is >> converted to a tex file of 1.0mb and a pdf of 2.0mb with 505 pages. The >> conversion is done through this code snippet '(global-set-key (kbd >> "s-#") 'org-latex-

Re: [O] links-9.0 v3

Hello, John Kitchin writes: > Here are my current suggestions for the org-link 9.0. Thank you. > Let me know what the best way to send these might be. It looks like it > might be 21 patches right now. AFAIU, many among them introduce code that no longer exists in the final draft. It would be

Re: [O] Clocking without timestamp

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > This syntax isn't valid. Actually it is rather unexpected that it was > producing something meaningful before. > > CLOCK lines require at least a time-stamp. Didn't know about this. Thanks! > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou Best, Sanel pgp1_xfrmhjM3.pgp Descriptio

Re: [O] Struggling with setting up ox-koma-letter.el

Hi, Sorry about the slow reply. nljlistb...@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > At 16:09 -0300 on Sunday 2016-06-26, N. Jackson wrote: > >> I am trying to get ox-koma-letter.el working in my Emacs (25.0.95). >> >> I have been following the instructions at >> http://orgmode.org/worg/exporters/koma-l

Re: [O] Struggling with setting up ox-koma-letter.el

Hi, On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:03:18 -0300 nljlistb...@gmail.com (N. Jackson) wrote: > At 16:09 -0300 on Sunday 2016-06-26, N. Jackson wrote: > > > I am trying to get ox-koma-letter.el working in my Emacs (25.0.95). > > > > I have been following the instructions at > > http://orgmode.org/worg/export