Paste the following in an Org buffer:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* Cookie_a [0/0]
* TODO Dummy_a
* Cookie_b [0/1]
** TODO Dummy_b
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
Within that buffer:
1. Move point to the line of Dummy_a.
Leslie Watter writes:
> Where in styles.xml did you put the above statement ?
>
Check the styles.xml attachment in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/108503/focus=108532
for the original placement and in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/108503/focus=108535
for the mod
Thank you for your response. I have GNU Emacs 24.5.1
(x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0, NS apple-appkit-1265.21) .
One possibility is that in OS X, there is a default emacs with version
22.1.1. I tried brew update but I think for some reason it is not updated
and may cause for this problem.
Is there a wa
Hi Uwe,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>
>> Can you try the attached styles.xml? I just moved the style to another
>> place and I get the page break (whereas I did not get it with your
>> original styles.xml). But I really don't know t
With the most current master, I get these two failed tests:
2 unexpected results:
FAILED ob-shell/bash-uses-assoc-arrays
FAILED test-ob/indented-cached-org-bracket-link
This is with a Mac, and GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0, NS
appkit-1265.21 Version 10.9.5 (Build 13F1808
Uwe Brauer writes:
>>> It seems that the verse environment does what I want, it is however
>>> exported in a ugly font (type writer), how can I change that font.
>
>> See the manual, section 12.9.4 "Applying custom styles".
>
> That section is a very general one, I cannot find anythin
Hi,
The attached patch enables to choose whether link contains a (file-)path to
self, or not. One new variable "org-link-ignore-path-to-self" should be
true as the original behavior (~ no path to self by org-insert-link).
However, the path-to-self will remain when the value is nil.
This feature i
Thank you!
`(org-display-outline-path nil t)’ gets it done.
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> "Roelli, Charles A" writes:
>
>> Sent this in a few days ago, and it does not seem to have gone through:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> If I have this structure, with poi