Nicolas, thank you for the feedback, and I apologize for my errors.
On Sun, Apr 19 2020, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> You need to provide a commit message, using git format-patch
> mechanism.
>
Apologies while I learn the procedure. I have corrected the issues below and
generated a commit patch a
Nicolas,
thanks for the history! sounds like a good tradeoff. i agree, a bit
more documentation would be good.
cheers, Greg
Greg Minshall writes:
> Nicolas, thanks. i take it this is a change from (recent?) past
> behavior?
I think this was done between Org 9.1 and 9.2, the final step probably
being 99dbca3d4f2fb30f35309a0bf4c324535b7dc9f3
> it was kind of nice the old way, but i suspect i'll get used
> to the ne
Nicolas, thanks. i take it this is a change from (recent?) past
behavior? it was kind of nice the old way, but i suspect i'll get used
to the new way (no names, just noweb-ref) fairly soon. cheers, Greg
Hello,
Greg Minshall writes:
> hi. the description of :noweb-ref says
>
> When expanding “noweb” style references, the bodies of all code block
> with _either_ a block name matching the reference name _or_ a
> ‘:noweb-ref’ header argument matching the reference name will be
> concatenated
hi. the description of :noweb-ref says
When expanding “noweb” style references, the bodies of all code block
with _either_ a block name matching the reference name _or_ a
‘:noweb-ref’ header argument matching the reference name will be
concatenated together to form the replacement text.
Hello,
Roberto Alejandro Rodriguez writes:
> oh thanks for the tip
You're welcome.
I'm closing these bug reports.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> stardiviner writes:
>
>> I thought intuitively that property drawers "mostly expanded" and regular
>> drawers like :LOGBOOK: drawer "mostly folded".
>
> There is no such thing as ":LOGBOOK:" drawers. There are
Hello,
Brian Powell writes:
> Thank you for the message. I spent about 2 hours on it today learning
> more about lisp and the internals to explain your email to me.
> I learned a lot.
Thank you.
> I have modified ox-html.el to include a local OPTION as well as
> a customizable setting. I teste
Hello,
stardiviner writes:
> I thought intuitively that property drawers "mostly expanded" and regular
> drawers like :LOGBOOK: drawer "mostly folded".
There is no such thing as ":LOGBOOK:" drawers. There are property
drawers, and regular drawers. "LOGBOOK" belongs to the latter.
>> Another (b
Hello,
I’ve spotted a small mistake in the doc.
Best,
--
Leo Vivier
>From b2b2582b4eb1deb1a41f200a17876dfbcbf26b5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leo Vivier
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 12:01:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/org.el (org-mode-map): fix typo
---
lisp/org-keys.el | 2 +-
1 file chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> stardiviner writes:
>
>> This sounds reasonable. (I deleted my patch on my local fork, I think your
>> solution is better.)
>
> I pushed the changes. Now drawers folding is on par with blocks. You can
> hide
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> I can't see that it's necessary to have a fourth, because I think the
> result of that would be this, which doesn't make any sense.
>
> 4. "Doe blah blah {2017}"/"Doe blah blah {[3]}" ->
> author-in-text+suppress-author command
>
> Let us know what you think?
I think t
Nicolas,
Thank you for the message. I spent about 2 hours on it today learning more
about lisp and the internals to explain your email to me. I learned a lot.
I have modified ox-html.el to include a local OPTION as well as a customizable
setting. I tested with both as well as with an export opt
14 matches
Mail list logo