> When dealing with complicated date rules it can likely happen that a
> diary sexp doesn't fit into one line.
Diary sexp can be a user-defined function. If your sexp needs to span
multiple lines, it is probably worth defining a function and simply
using <%%(your-function)> as a timestamp.
Best,
> It can? Thatʼs not documented, as far as I can tell.
It is literally called "diary sexp". You can use any elisp sexp there,
like (let ...) or (or ...) or (function-name ...)
Robert Pluim writes:
>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2020 21:35:54 +0800, Ihor Radchenko
>> said:
>
> >> When dealing
Hi again,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Patch attached. Comments welcome, of course.
IMHO it deserves a small addition to etc/ORG-NEWS.
Can one of you add it?
--
Bastien
Hello Bastien,
Below I've included some quick (hopefully useful) notes on the
changes
I've made.
Bastien writes:
p.s. If you'd like a TLDR on that website thread I started I'd
happily
attempt one. I just hope you don't find me too presumptions
going as far
as I have without having
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2020 21:35:54 +0800, Ihor Radchenko
> said:
>> When dealing with complicated date rules it can likely happen that a
>> diary sexp doesn't fit into one line.
Ihor> Diary sexp can be a user-defined function. If your sexp needs to span
Ihor> multiple
Robert Pluim writes:
> I can push my change to org, but Iʼm not a regular org contributor, so
> Iʼd prefer to hear from one of the maintainers first.
Sorry - I meant, I see no reason to touch the existing code. No need to
change anything for what I want.
> Michael> This doesn't work:
>
>
> I don't have a strong opinion here.
>
> Why do you think it would it be a better as a default?
It seems that other people expect it to be default [1]. Also, I am using
org-attach heavily in my workflows. Most of the time I found myself
inserting the link to attachment right after attaching a
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:46:48 +0200, Michael Heerdegen
> said:
Michael> Robert Pluim writes:
>> It can? Thatʼs not documented, as far as I can tell.
Michael> As a user, I read "Diary-style expression entries" in the org
manual as
Michael> including my own defined
Hi Christopher,
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Christopher W. Ryan writes:
>
>> how do I create next, previous, and up navigation links when exporting
>> to html, like in the org mode manual:
>>
>> https://orgmode.org/manual/HTML-specific-export-settings.html
>
> I think that's created in a two-step
Robert Pluim writes:
> It can? Thatʼs not documented, as far as I can tell.
As a user, I read "Diary-style expression entries" in the org manual as
including my own defined diary sexps - excluding them would be a
surprise that should be documented (no, I don't want that to happen!).
Michael.
Hi Timothy,
TEC writes:
> Ah, I see. I was going off a line in
> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html
> "If you are undertaking big changes, please create a dedicated branch"
>
> I'm not sure if ~10 commits counted, but thought this may be the way to
> go. Once again, thanks for
Hello Bastien,
My current work-around is to map F12 to (org-mode-restart).
After installing a fresh version of Emacs 27.1 using the Windows
installer, and copying
org-9.3.7 to ~/.emacs.d, the first file I open is not colorized until
I use F12. My init.el contains:
(add-to-list 'load-path
> Multi-line sexps in time stamps work would just be nice to have. Would
> it be hard to achieve? I mean, since multi-line %%(...) entries already
> work...
The problem is that org-mode assumes that planning line must be a single
line and a lot of internal logic hard-code this assumption.
For
That is understandable; they're big patches. I recommend going over ob-java
first. Java is probably more familiar to you and ob-java and ob-haxe are
very similar. These were mostly based on ob-python and ob-C. The tests are
based on ob-Cs tests.
Look carefully at org-babel-temp-dir and
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> > When dealing with complicated date rules it can likely happen that a
> > diary sexp doesn't fit into one line.
>
> Diary sexp can be a user-defined function. If your sexp needs to span
> multiple lines, it is probably worth defining a function and simply
> using
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> > I didn't know that eval specs support multi-line sexps, but seems that
> > works, so I can indeed use this. Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> Hmm. According to manual, it should support multi-line string. Not sure
> about sexps.
AFAIR it didn't work in the past. I
> org-insert-link (C-c C-l) will read a file name from you if you select
> "file:" or call it with a prefix argument.
This will do, thanks!
ср, 2 сент. 2020 г. в 03:08, Kyle Meyer :
>
> Dmitrii Korobeinikov writes:
>
> > Hi, all!
> >
> > Is there a way to provide completions for paths
> >
> I didn't know that eval specs support multi-line sexps, but seems that
> works, so I can indeed use this. Thanks for the suggestion.
Hmm. According to manual, it should support multi-line string. Not sure
about sexps.
In the worst case when you absolutely want multi-line sexp to be really
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> I've been trying to find a way to cordon off the bottom of my Org files,
>> to create an area for file-local variables and "LocalWords" and what
>> have you that Org doesn't consider part of the file's final heading.
>>
>> The
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I do not think there is support of multi-line planning everywhere.
I see.
> You can always use file-local definition at the beginning or end of your
> org file. Below is an example of local definition at the end of an org
> file.
>
> # Local Variables:
> # eval: (defun
Hi Charles:
Thanks for the clear explanation. Add default ":tangle yes" does what I
expected.
But when I try to tangle it to a file like this (with default ":tangle no"):
(org-babel-tangle nil "foo.el")
I end up get 2 files:
foo.el:
(setq foo "hello")
test_tangle.el:
(setq bar "world")
Should
Not a bug. See inline.
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:37 AM, Enze Chi wrote:
>
>
> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
>
> https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
>
> Your
On Thursday, 3 Sep 2020 at 14:29, Bastien wrote:
> IMHO it deserves a small addition to etc/ORG-NEWS.
Already there although maybe I added it in the wrong section? I put it
under Version 9.4 -> New options.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.3.7-725-g7bc18e
I get one file, "foo.el", with both src blocks.
Chuck
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Enze Chi wrote:
>
> Hi Charles:
>
> Thanks for the clear explanation. Add default ":tangle yes" does what I
> expected.
>
> But when I try to tangle it to a file like this (with default ":tangle no"):
>
Bastien writes:
> Hi again,
>
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> Patch attached. Comments welcome, of course.
>
> IMHO it deserves a small addition to etc/ORG-NEWS.
>
> Can one of you add it?
v2 (87imd33mys@ucl.ac.uk) included a NEWS entry.
Matt Huszagh writes:
> Hello,
>
> This patch omits a file description when :file-desc has a nil
> value. Previously, the following src block
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC asymptote :results value file :file circle.pdf :file-desc
> :output-dir img/
> size(2cm);
> draw(unitcircle);
> #+END_SRC
>
> would
Matt Huszagh writes:
> This patch omits a file description when :file-desc has a nil
> value.
I've modified the patch to yield the same effect when executing a source
block.
Matt
>From 24d156e421973b5a97f1c797d48f1daa95348898 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Huszagh
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020
Does refreshing the buffer work too? If so, I’ve had the same issue for a
while, but never really knew what was going on?
Matt
>
> On Sep 2, 2020 at 10:20 PM, mailto:djsamp...@gmail.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> No colors appear in first file opened.
Hello,
This patch omits a file description when :file-desc has a nil
value. Previously, the following src block
#+BEGIN_SRC asymptote :results value file :file circle.pdf :file-desc
:output-dir img/
size(2cm);
draw(unitcircle);
#+END_SRC
would yield
#+RESULTS:
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
Hello,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I may miss something, but it does not look [for me] any more specific
> in comparison with headline format:
>
> - headline :: "^\*+ .+$"
> - first line of note :: "^[ \t]*-.+$"
I do see a big difference, tho. Starting a line with an asterisk
followed by a
When doing org captures using the datetree format, newly added headlines
do not follow the value of `org-blank-before-new-entry'. This seems to
be the fault of `org-datetree-insert-line' using `insert' as opposed to
`org-insert-heading' to do its work. See the attachment for a proposed
fix.
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> I've been trying to find a way to cordon off the bottom of my Org files,
> to create an area for file-local variables and "LocalWords" and what
> have you that Org doesn't consider part of the file's final heading.
>
> The usual Emacs thing to do seems to be
stardiviner writes:
> This is really great to get official support for Org Mode.
+1! Thanks Ivan.
--
Bastien
Hi Richard,
Richard Lawrence writes:
> I haven't tested it extensively, and the code can surely be improved,
> but it works for the cases I could think to test.
thanks for writing and sharing this - perhaps you can add a link to
this message in https://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.html ?
Best,
Hi Diego,
Diego Zamboni writes:
> Just a quick update: issue
> https://github.com/purcell/package-lint/issues/89 submitted by Kaushal
> has been closed through the PR I submitted, so now package-lint
> officially accepts "org-" symbols in "ox-" and "ob-" packages :)
Thanks for taking care of
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> The default value of org-attach-store-link-p is nil for now.
> Would it make more sense to set it to something else (say, 'attach)?
> I believe that 'attach or t would be better as a default.
>
> Thoughts?
I don't have a strong opinion here.
Why do you think
Hi Bastien!
Great to see you back on the lists again :)
Bastien writes:
> Good guess :) I'm rolling up my sleeves to get to 9.4 ASAP so that
> we can commit features in the master branch again soonish.
>
> Still, you can share patches on the list, that's useful to discuss
> and improve
Hi Dominick,
Dominick Samperi writes:
> No colors appear in first file opened. Must use (org-mode-restart)
> to enable colors after opening first file.
Can you provide a reproducible recipe?
--
Bastien
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Kyle Meyer writes:
>
>> I'll let this sit for another day to see if other comments come in.
>
> Applied (e8ebf5d6c).
A welcome enhancement - thanks Eric and Kyle!
--
Bastien
Hi Timothy,
TEC writes:
> Are we still in a feature freeze?
Yes.
> At the start of June Bastien announced a feature freeze (Release
> 9.3.7). As we are now moving into September, I'm wondering if this
> is still in effect? I can't see any recent emails from Bastien
> either so I'm guessing
41 matches
Mail list logo
