Re: [PATCH] org-test: Create a collaborative test set for Org buffer parser

2021-12-14 Thread Max Nikulin
On 11/12/2021 21:39, Ihor Radchenko wrote: The attached patch is an attempt to create something like shared repo for Org element parser tests. "[PATCH]" prefix in the subject might be a reason why you message received less attention than it should. The test set is essentially a series of

[org-cite] pandoc adds initial read/write support

2021-12-14 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
John MacFarlane merged initial support for org-cite to the pandoc org reader and writer. Only available in master ATM, but could use real-world testing, including of the org-ref -> org-cite conversion, which you can get by using org as both input and output format. Bruce

Re: [PATCH] org-test: Create a collaborative test set for Org buffer parser

2021-12-14 Thread Tim Cross
Max Nikulin writes: > On 11/12/2021 21:39, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > > Since these tests will unlikely become a part of some software, I do not think > that GPL may be an obstacle for any project. Requirement of signed consent > will > likely prevent contributing of new cases from some

next-error for agenda searches

2021-12-14 Thread Samuel Wales
if you search for a regexp in a single org buffer, you can do next-error to go to the next search. if you search in agenda, there is a mode where the match will show up in the ohter window. i find this inconvenient. there is no next-error to go to the next match for agenda searches. or am i