[Orgmode] Tag Inheritance

2007-05-30 Thread Russell Adams
I understand from the example in the manual that sublevels inherit the parent's tags: * One :Top: ** Two :Middle: *** Three :Bottom: So Three matches Top, Middle, and Bottom. What I'm confused with is that I may have multiple headings, and all

[Orgmode] org-blog.el updated to v1.17

2007-05-30 Thread David O'Toole
Available from http://dto.freeshell.org/e/org-blog.el This is the first usable release of org-blog. Instructions for setup and use are in the file's commentary. It requires org-mode at least 4.75 (very recent, see quoted posts below.) You can see an example of the output at

Re: [Orgmode] latex fragments

2007-05-30 Thread Carsten Dominik
On May 30, 2007, at 1:50, Paul Schlesinger wrote: I do not see any consequence of changing the scaling factor from 1.0 to 2.0 and re compliing the equaiton.  I can get hte color to work but cannot make the equation bigger. Yes, a bug, left over from testing during a previous release. This

Re: [Orgmode] Tag Inheritance

2007-05-30 Thread Carsten Dominik
Please take a look at the variable `org-show-following-heading'. This is now really a frequently asked question - I am wondering if I should change the default of this option - Carsten On May 30, 2007, at 15:34, Russell Adams wrote: I understand from the example in the manual that

Re: [Orgmode] Tag Inheritance

2007-05-30 Thread Eddward DeVilla
I was thinking the same thing. (Sadly I didn't know the option of the top of my head and had to search the .el file to try and find it.) Would there be any way to differentiate the matched heading from the surrounding context? In regular GUIs I'd say grey of the context, but that doesn't

Re: [Orgmode] Tag Inheritance

2007-05-30 Thread Carsten Dominik
On May 30, 2007, at 16:21, Eddward DeVilla wrote: I was thinking the same thing. (Sadly I didn't know the option of the top of my head and had to search the .el file to try and find it.) Would there be any way to differentiate the matched heading from the surrounding context? In regular

[Orgmode] Two bugs

2007-05-30 Thread Leo
Dear Carsen, 1. unnecessary point movement When 'S-tab' (visibility cycling), the `point' (cursor) will be moved to the first headline, which will be a surprise to users. I think the movement should be kept as minimal as possible i.e. it should be kept within the tree the `point' is originally

Re: [Orgmode] Tag Inheritance

2007-05-30 Thread Russell Adams
You're absolutely correct. Thanks. On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:14:10PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: Please take a look at the variable `org-show-following-heading'. This is now really a frequently asked question - I am wondering if I should change the default of this option -

[Orgmode] Small bug in timestamp editing

2007-05-30 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
There's a bug in editing inactive timestamps when they are a part of a CLOCK line (org 4.75 on cvs emacs). E.g.: * test CLOCK: [2007-05-30 Wed 13:30]--[2007-05-30 Wed 13:32] = 0:02 Try editing the /second/ timestamp with org-shiftup or similar. It will result in: * test CLOCK: [2007-05-30

[Orgmode] #+PRIORITIES: in XEmacs

2007-05-30 Thread Wes Nakamura
When I attempt to use the new #+PRIORITIES: feature from 4.75 in XEmacs 21.5, I get the following trace when opening the file. It doesn't matter if I'm using letters or numbers as priorities, or whether variables such as org-lowest-priority are set. Any pointers? I'm particurly interested in

[Orgmode] Re: Two bugs

2007-05-30 Thread Leo
- Carsten Dominik (2007-05-30) wrote:- On May 30, 2007, at 16:45, Leo wrote: Dear Carsen, 1. unnecessary point movement When 'S-tab' (visibility cycling), the `point' (cursor) will be moved to the first headline, which will be a surprise to users. I think the movement should be