Wanrong Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems that as long as the agenda buffer contains a line with a tag,
the error happens. If I manually delete those lines using M-x
kill-line, the error goes away.
Looks like `htmlize-buffer' doesn't like the org-tag face. I cannot dig
this further for
There will be a solution for this in 5.14.
- Carsten
On 18Aug2007, at 12:19 PM, Daniel Clemente wrote:
Hi,
in a file I would like to write following line:
„Writing [1] you can create a footnote.
But then [1] is interpreted as a footnote. I have tried escaping it:
\[1\] =[1]=
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out
Carsten Dominik writes:
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if
Hi,
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
still worth supporting it
I definitely think it is. (Although I'm currently giving Gnu Emacs
another try after years of XEmacs-induced productivity ;-)
Regards,
Stefan
--
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On 11Nov2007, at 6:06 PM, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Hi,
I wonder anyone has seen this:
After I do a tag search (for TODO items), if I do htmlize-buffer on
the search result, I will get an invalid face error. Since I have
quite some customization on my org-mode, I am not
Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Another XEmacs user raising his hand -- please keep XEmacs compatibility.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed
On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on
There are two autoload lines in org-install.el that are missing
the file argument:
...
(autoload 'org-run-like-in-org-mode Run a command like in Org-mode.)
(autoload 'org-agenda-to-appt Activate appointments in `org-agenda-files'.)
...
They should be
...
(autoload 'org-run-like-in-org-mode org
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.4 (patch 20) Double Solitaire XEmacs Lucid--text
follows this line--
FCC: ~/Mail/messages_envoyés
Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
On 2007-11-13 15:37 +, Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
Yes, this is a bug, thank you.
- Carsten
On 13Nov2007, at 7:32 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
There are two autoload lines in org-install.el that are missing
the file argument:
...
(autoload 'org-run-like-in-org-mode Run a command like in Org-mode.)
(autoload 'org-agenda-to-appt Activate
On 13Nov2007, at 9:58 PM, Leo wrote:
On 2007-11-13 15:37 +, Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not
turn it
into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Well, the fact that it
| On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
| multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
| easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
|
| Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs
14 matches
Mail list logo
