Hi Eric,
Thanks for the help.
It was in the rake themes:default step. I got an error message about a
missing command, which I think was sass. I'll uninstall surfar and
try to get an accurate error message later today.
Hi Ian,
The issue here is that ruby couldn't find the sass executable on
Taru Karttunen tar...@taruti.net writes:
Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Sun May 17 20:28:01 +0300 2009:
Following on from this, I'd like to suggest that, while it is being
edited, the source code is removed from the org buffer, to avoid
concurrency problems. I just had a go at that --
Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Mon May 18 09:07:11 +0300 2009:
I think it's more complicated than that: source code loss is also the
motivation for doing something like this. If you are editing the code in
the *Org Edit Src* buffer, and get distracted, you may return to the org
buffer
Can you please send me the exact buffer you are using, the exact range
that is covered by the active region, and the command you then use?
So far I have not been abe to reproduce what you are saying.
- Carsten
On May 18, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
The bug occurs when the region
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:07, Matthew Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
In my opinion, the easiest way to figure out which project a TODO
belongs to is to use follow mode in the agenda. That way you can see the
original context (i.e., project) to which a todo belongs.
This works great for
On May 18, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Mon May 18 09:07:11 +0300 2009:
I think it's more complicated than that: source code loss is also the
motivation for doing something like this. If you are editing the
code in
the *Org Edit Src* buffer,
On May 17, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Following on from this, I'd like to suggest that, while it is being
edited, the source code is removed from the org buffer, to avoid
concurrency problems. I just had a go at that -- the patch below
replaces the source code with a work-in-progress
Hallo,
I am new to this list and apologize if this has been asked before.
Before I forget: many thanks for this EXCELLENT package!
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac system.
At least I think I have installed that version correctly (Aquamacs 1.7
uses an older
Hello,
Here is a simple asymptote block :
#+begin_asy out.pdf
import graph;
size(0,4cm);
real f(real t) {return 1+cos(t);}
path g=polargraph(f,0,2pi,operator ..)--cycle;
filldraw(g,pink);
xaxis($x$,above=true);
yaxis($y$,above=true);
dot($(a,0)$,(1,0),N);
dot($(2a,0)$,(2,0),N+E);
#+end_asy
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac system. At
least I think I have installed that version correctly (Aquamacs 1.7 uses
an older version of org-mode) - how can I find out which version I am
really using?
org/Documentation/Show version in an org buffer, or M-x
Ian Barton wrote:
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac system.
At least I think I have installed that version correctly (Aquamacs 1.7
uses an older version of org-mode) - how can I find out which version
I am really using?
org/Documentation/Show version in an org
On May 18, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Stefan Vollmar wrote:
Hallo,
I am new to this list and apologize if this has been asked before.
Before I forget: many thanks for this EXCELLENT package!
(1) I am running org 6.26d with Aquamacs 1.7 on a current Mac
system. At least I think I have installed
You might want to take a look into the stylesheets on orgmode.org:
http://orgmode.org/org.css
and
http://orgmode.org/worg/worg.css
Depending on the tools you use on your site, modifiing the files on the
fly (on output, maybe cached) might be a good solution too (DOM or XML
parser). You might
this is a test, please ignore
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Ian Barton li...@manor-farm.org writes:
[...]
Meanwhile have another problem:) When I try to view a page I can see
the basic navigation structure, but no style info or content. I notice
that there is no stylesheet.css in ~/blogs and I tried copying one
from the blorgit directory there. I do
Thanks for the example.
I've added it along with a line crediting you as the author to the
org-exp-blocks page on worg.
Cheers -- Eric
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@neuf.fr writes:
Hello,
Here is a simple asymptote block :
#+begin_asy out.pdf
import graph;
size(0,4cm);
real f(real t)
Hi Tennis,
On May 17, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Tennis Smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newbie user of org-mode, and it looks very promising.
However, there are several key combinations that I have to change if
I'm going to use it. I use the combinations C-tab for iswitchb,
You could free up C-tab by
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
On May 14, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Dale Smith wrote:
I'm confused about the value of FORMAT in {{{date(FORMAT)}}}.
I wanted to use %B %e, %Y, but I have two problems. With the
quotes, I get an eval: End of file during parsing message.
The follow-mode works fine, and this is what I use currently, but usually
the item doesn't have data that tells clearly what it's parent item is. It'd
be nice to have this overview, in the flat form -- like Eraldo said, if
you'd like to print or just have a 10.000 feet view of the actions.
I'm
I recall that there was a variable that controls whether dots get put
into the agenda line to show that it is a child of the previous agenda
line, or something like that.
Might possibly work if you include the parent?
What was the name of that variable anyway?
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 19:07,
On May 18, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Mon May 18 09:07:11 +0300 2009:
I think it's more complicated than that: source code loss is also the
motivation for doing something like this. If you are editing the
code in
the *Org Edit Src* buffer,
Sorry for the delays in getting this posted, I've been doing a lot of
traveling lately.
The attached version of org-crypt fixes a few bugs and is just about
ready to be included in org proper. The only thing it might need before
inclusion in org is automatic encryption via hooks.
I'd like to
===
#this is a comment because of a vague recollection that the
#first line isn't supposed to be a headline. has that been
#fixed?
* this is a headline with a link. [[http://google.com][a search engine]]
this is body text. i put point on the headline at bol, then
do c-spc c-spc down down down
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
On May 18, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Davison's message of Mon May 18 09:07:11 +0300 2009:
I think it's more complicated than that: source code loss is also the
motivation for doing something like this. If you
Almost every time I click on a link, it inserts a return. I then have
to do org-reload, and it works for a bit. Then the next time I need
to follow a link (with intervening commands) it doesn't work.
Hints on how to provide information (post-command-hook?) to ease
debugging would be
Dear Sebastian,
On 18.05.2009, at 14:33, Sebastian Rose wrote:
You might want to take a look into the stylesheets on orgmode.org:
http://orgmode.org/org.css
and
http://orgmode.org/worg/worg.css
Depending on the tools you use on your site, modifiing the files on
the
fly (on output, maybe
I'd like to find out how people feel about that. Should org-crypt
attach itself to org-mode-hook so that it can decrypt encrypted entries
after you open an org file? At first I thought yes, but now I'm leaning
towards no, you should decrypt entries manually as needed.
Yes, manually sounds
I think that typically you load a library, then run a function to add
stuff to hooks. That way, loading the library does not have
side-effects. Some packages use the term insinuate.
I'd opt for a default of always encrypting when saving and only
decrypting when manually done. Maybe a little
No, just a workaround of inserting both the parent and the child and
letting the dots tell you the relationship between them.
But perhaps I am not following the thread closely enough.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 15:01, Eraldo Helal ad...@eraldo.at wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 18:21, Samuel Wales
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 00:16, Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com wrote:
No, just a workaround of inserting both the parent and the child and
letting the dots tell you the relationship between them.
How?
I would have to show all Project headlines in order to make this work...
However, I only
I had the idea of using CATEGORY as a keyword.
Benefit:
using #+CATEGORY (or the CATEGORY property)
has the disadvantage that if I change the headline the category does not
update:
example:
Org-file:
* PROJECT *my_renamed_project1*
:PROPERTIES:
:CATEGORY: *myproject1*
:END:
** TODO clean
I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
C-c i:
#+BEGIN_SRC html-mode
pfoobar/p
#+END_SRC
Am I missing something? The short form for code literals
(prepending a line with colon-space) seems to
* On Sat 05:39PM +, 16 May 2009, Carsten Dominik
(carsten.domi...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi Hsiu-Khuern,
On May 15, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
Hi Carsten,
You recently changed org-edit-src-code to use a separate buffer instead of an
indirect buffer. One side effect of
Hi Tom,
Tom Tobin korp...@korpios.com writes:
I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
C-c i:
C-c i is undefined with my setup. Did you mean C-c '?
#+BEGIN_SRC html-mode
pfoobar/p
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Tobin korp...@korpios.com writes:
I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
C-c i:
C-c i is undefined with my
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 11:33 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Hello list,
I'd like to do a little modification to the code that grabs the
summary of items for the agenda view. For each item that has a
parent with a
Tom Tobin korp...@korpios.com writes:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Tobin korp...@korpios.com writes:
I'm having some issues using #+BEGIN_SRC; doing the following doesn't
seem to use the org-code face, and doesn't seem to work correctly with
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Tobin korp...@korpios.com writes:
Hmm ... C-c ' now works only if the block is flush with the left
margin. Is this intentional?
Yes, it's intentional. The # has to be the first character on the
line. It's the
38 matches
Mail list logo
