Just another off-topic but however related...:
> C-u C-c C-x C-i i
>
What if C-u C-c C-x C-i could show, in addition to the recently
clocked tasks, some fixed tasks from a user-defined list?
The dialog would be:
Common tasks:
[1] answer phone
[b] breakfast
[p] procrastinate!
[n] think abou
Aloha all,
Apologies in advance if the answer to this query is obvious. I've
looked through the documentation but can't find how to specify
multiple publishing projects. There are examples of simple projects
and projects with multiple components, but no example that I can find
of a spec
I've been watching this thread closely. At this point I want to jump in.
I like the ideas that have been posted here so far, about a different way of
organizing remember in org. I'm not completely certain, but it seems that
part of what was asked for earlier is included in org-remember already,
Some idea about remember variations:
> +1, can we keep/have:
> - the templates,
> - possibility to 'pick file/topic first then remember'
Actually what I would find useful is a task dispatcher for Emacs: a way to go
to common tasks with a few keys.
For instance: C-c C-x C-g would open your c
On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote:
Even graphics made in tikz, that does not use postscript commands,
do not appear
in DVI viewers. I haven't used the preview-latex with graphics in
AucTeX, but if
it is able to view graphics made with pstricks, as it appears to be
Even graphics made in tikz, that does not use postscript commands, do not appear
in DVI viewers. I haven't used the preview-latex with graphics in AucTeX, but if
it is able to view graphics made with pstricks, as it appears to be the case,
then maybe it is better to first investigate how preview-l
I have set org-agenda-prefix-format to: (org-agenda-prefix-format " %-8:c ")
making the agenda look like so:
home:[ ] brainstorm redesign home
evening school: [ ] chose DE spec.
evening school: [ ] ask Lea re: spec topics
evening school: [ ] brainstorm Learners Group
eraldo: [ ] brainsto
At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:05:38 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> > Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote:
> >
> >> At Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:55:22 +0200,
> >> Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >>> Do we need to implement a way so that text can be made to flow
> >
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 21:44 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
> Sebastian writes:
>
> > Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
> >> Carsten Dominik writes:
> >>
> >> >> 2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
> >> >> a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define th
Sebastian writes:
> Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>> >> 2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
>> >> a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those
>> >> macros? That way we could use those boxes in all
>> >>
On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Sebastian wrote:
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
Carsten Dominik writes:
2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those
macros? That way we could use those boxes in all
Am Montag, den 05.10.2009, 14:52 +0800 schrieb Bastien:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
> >> 2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?)
> >> a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those
> >> macros? That way we could use those boxes in all
> >> our files, and they all
Bug report+testcase
Hi, I found a bug related to lists within footnotes [1]. org-mode from
git (release_6.31.27.g407b).
[1] To reproduce it:
- open this test case
- C-c C-e b
- notice that this list doesn't appear under the „footnotes“ section,
but *mixed with the „end list“ at the end*
Note tha
13 matches
Mail list logo
