[Orgmode] Bug: Not on a heading seen on indenting headlines with an indented list as content [6.34]

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.

Re: [Orgmode] Bug: Not on a heading seen on indenting headlines with an indented list as content [6.34]

Hi Martin, I am unable to reproduce this. Could you please try to create a minimal setup with a minimum configuration? Thanks. - Carsten On Jan 11, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen.

Re: [Orgmode] Bug: Not on a heading seen on indenting headlines with an indented list as content [6.34]

Hi Carsten and Matthew, I think the problem is related to mrd-org-smartwrap-mode, but I cannot further pinpoint it. Here is a small startup file for reproducing (init.mrd.el): --8--8--8--8--8-- ; path to current org-mode here (add-to-list

[Orgmode] Update ispell-dictionary to text language

Hello, Here my proposal (and my very first self-written chunk of ELisp code) for switching to the right language for ispell, upon reading the contents of the meta-tag `LANGUAGE'. --8---cut here---start-8--- (defun org-switch-language () Switch language

[Orgmode] TODO dependencies and file-level keywords

Hi Carsten, I'm using Org-mode 6.33f under GNU Emacs 22.1.1 and Windows XP Pro SP3. In one of my Org files, I have the line: #+TYP_TODO: TODO NEXT WAIT PROJ | DONE NODO But I find that, in the snippet below for example, tasks b and c are not dependency-blocked, i.e. I can switch them to DONE

Re: [Orgmode] TODO dependencies and file-level keywords

Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this. these are blocked just fine for me, at least the first time I try. If I try again immediately, the entries do switch to other non-done states, but not to DONE. - Carsten On Jan 11, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Chris Randle wrote: Hi Carsten, I'm using

Re: [Orgmode] Re: The download links dont' work

Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: Hi all, The download links for org-mode don't work. So does the link to the BEAMER_section ;-( http://orgmode.org/manual/Beamer-class-export#Beamer-class-export http://orgmode.org/manual/Beamer-class-export.html#Beamer-class-export

Re: [Orgmode] TODO dependencies and file-level keywords

Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this. I can reproduce it [beware, with 6.33trans 2010-01-08 version!] Carsten, I will update to 6.34trans in few minutes and post the results. Org-mode version 6.33trans (6.33trans) GNU Emacs

Re: [Orgmode] TODO dependencies and file-level keywords

Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this. I can reproduce it with the latest version: Org-mode version 6.34 (trans 2010-01-12 15:00 CET) GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of

Re: [Orgmode] TODO dependencies and file-level keywords

At Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:08:08 +0100, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this. I can reproduce it with the latest version: Org-mode version 6.34 (trans

Re: [Orgmode] TODO dependencies and file-level keywords

David Maus maus.da...@gmail.com writes: At Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:08:08 +0100, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this. I can reproduce it with the latest version:

[Orgmode] Re: Update ispell-dictionary to text language

Hey Sébastien, Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: Hello, Here my proposal (and my very first self-written chunk of ELisp code) for switching to the right language for ispell, upon reading the contents of the meta-tag `LANGUAGE'. I think using File Variables are better for

[Orgmode] [PATCH] bugfix in org-agenda-fix-displayed-tags

An error was thrown when all tags of a headline are hidden by org-agenda-hide-tags-regexp (in this case the function get-text-property got nil as third argument) --- lisp/org-agenda.el | 18 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/org-agenda.el

Re: [Orgmode] TODO dependencies and file-level keywords

On Jan 11, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: David Maus maus.da...@gmail.com writes: At Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:08:08 +0100, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Chris, I am not able to

[Orgmode] org-table and formulas

Hi, Here's what I'm trying to do (without success) in my spreadsheet: I have a first table : #+TBLNAME: table1 | ... |... | |...|... and a second table: #+TBLNAME: table2 | line_reference | ... |... | |...|... The line_reference is the line number to get some information in the

[Orgmode] Exporting Column view Estimate

I would like to export an estimate in column view via the text exporter. When I export the file now, none of the hour estimates or summation of estimates is displayed. Thanks, Dustin ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies

[orgmode] time-to-number-of-days

When I try to use column view in my org file (C-c C-x C-c), I get the following error: Symbol's function definition is void: time-to-number-of-days I looked at time-date.el and found the definition of time-to-number-of-days. I noticed that many of the functions in time-date.el have the

Re: [orgmode] time-to-number-of-days

Adding (require 'time-date) to your .emacs should make the functions in time-date available... but it looks like the require statement above is called in org.el, so maybe try adding the more forceful (load path/to/time-date.el) to your .emacs I'm not sure why the require statement in

[Orgmode] New slant on the Second tuesday of the month problem

The question of timestamps for events that occur based on the ordinal count of weeks in the month (e.g., every second Tuesday of the month) has come up several times before. The bottom line is that a diary sexp has to be used, and I understand that. This is fine for, say, U.S. election days