Hi,
Florian Friesdorf has suggested this patch to org-notmuch so that it is
enough to require org-notmuch in user init, and it seems a good idea. Is
it possible to include his patch?
Thanks
Matthieu
>From 4128169c3d22527342c90b675e847f4227f3b0c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Friesdorf
Hi,
- I cannot reproduce the problem you describe (Org-mode 7.5, GNU Emacs
23.3.1 on Mac).
- Upgrading to Emacs 23 would probably be a good idea.
- Does the problem only happen when using timer items? The problem
appears to occur in org-list-struct. I'd expect it to happen to you
with descr
Hi Tomer,
Yes this is the right forum for the report. I don't use a Mac or
relative timers so I'm afraid I can't be of much help on your issue.
There are other Mac users on this list so hopefully one of them will
respond.
Regards,
Bernt
Tomer Altman writes:
> Can someone merely reply and con
emacs 22.1, that is in Mac OSX 10.6.6 and Orgmode 7.4 Here is my .emacs file,
all stuff I've cribbed from either the tutorial or the Orgpdf itself, with my
own specification regarding what is in the agenda make up, a notes.org, school
and an Agenda.org(to differeniate from school deadlines)
-Tra
Can someone merely reply and confirm that:
* I've submitted this bug report to the correct forum
* I've supplied the information that I need to
Thank you for your time.
Cheers,
~Tomer Altman
On 4/13/11 10:59 AM, Tomer Altman wrote:
Hi,
I am an inexperienced org-mode user, so my apologies if
Asuptyam Bryuluanemon wrote:
> While following the installation instructions on
> http://orgmode.org/guide/Installation.html#Installation
>
> I get an error message after issuing the make command
>
> While compiling toplevel forms in file ~/src/org-7.5/lisp/org-feed.el:
> !! File error (("Ca
Asuptyam Bryuluanemon writes:
> While following the installation instructions on
> http://orgmode.org/guide/Installation.html#Installation
>
> I get an error message after issuing the make command
>
> While compiling toplevel forms in file ~/src/org-7.5/lisp/org-feed.el:
> !! File error (("Cann
Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> When using S- to modify a date with an our range in Org 7.5, I get
> "symbol function's definition is null : signum".
>
> E.g. <2011-03-10 jeu. 10:30-11:30>
>
> It appears that (org-modify-ts-extra) is using this function, but
> unlike in CL isn't not an elisp built-in
do you have your section of .emacs or site file customizations that
you used to set it up with? also what version of Ogmode and emacs?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Arnold, Travis wrote:
> Hi all after much googling and searching I came across org mode while trying
> to find a system for my
"Eric Schulte" writes:
Thanks for this answer.
I got it.
> Hi Mohamed,
>
> The comment prompt you mentioned actually isn't babel specific but is
> raised by the `comment-region' function which is used by babel to
> comment out links. Look at the documentation for `comment-region'
> (below) w
Hello,
At the last two org camps we talked about conflicting appointments. I
was thinking we could display on top of the calendar an agenda view of
the target date. That way we can quickly see potential conflicts before
confirming an appointment. What do you think?
Take care,
--
Ivan Kanis
http:
Hi. . . I'm new to org-mode and I'm totally blown away that I've never ran
across it before! Wow, so much to learn!
I have several questions for the group and am trying to do due diligence on
each of them because there is much material where the answer might lie. So
this is my first question: is
Hi all after much googling and searching I came across org mode while trying to
find a system for my mac on which I could take notes for my school classes.
I've read the manual and taken a look at the worg tutorials but seem to keep
messing up my .emacs config file, I seemed to have borked the
While following the installation instructions on
http://orgmode.org/guide/Installation.html#Installation
I get an error message after issuing the make command
While compiling toplevel forms in file ~/src/org-7.5/lisp/org-feed.el:
!! File error (("Cannot open load file" "sha1"))
Done
make: ***
When using S- to modify a date with an our range in Org 7.5, I get
"symbol function's definition is null : signum".
E.g. <2011-03-10 jeu. 10:30-11:30>
It appears that (org-modify-ts-extra) is using this function, but
unlike in CL isn't not an elisp built-in :)
As a work-around I added an interna
> This is a formal request to integrate my org-html.el & org-odt.el
> changes in to the master branch.
>
> This patch introduces 3 major features:
> 1. A generic exporter
> 2. All new html backend re-implemented as a plugin to (1).
> 3. A odt backend as a plugin to (1).
>
> The patch is based on
Richard Riley wrote:
>
>
> ,
> | + Create a file for each vhost you wish to redirect email for. From our
> example
> | we create /etc/exim4/virtualhosts/myweb.com. In it we place our email
> | mappings. Here is an example:-
> | #+begin_example
> | info: i...@gmail.com
> | webmaster: we
Is it possible to color inline footnotes with a special face in the
org file? It's a wishlist only.
Samuel
--
The Kafka Pandemic:
http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2010/12/welcome-to-kafka-pandemic-two-forces_9182.html
I support the Whittemore-Peterson Institute (WPI)
===
I want to see th
,
| + Create a file for each vhost you wish to redirect email for. From our
example
| we create /etc/exim4/virtualhosts/myweb.com. In it we place our email
| mappings. Here is an example:-
| #+begin_example
| info: i...@gmail.com
| webmaster: webmas...@gmail.com
| * : :blackhole:
| #+end
Eric Schulte wrote:
> If one goal of such a formal description of Org-mode would be to parse
> text Org-mode files into an abstract syntax tree ...
>
I think this should be the starting point: what are the goals for all this?
Providing a formal description in EBNF is one thing. Preparing an att
If one goal of such a formal description of Org-mode would be to parse
text Org-mode files into an abstract syntax tree (which is reminiscent
of [1] and [2]) then perhaps we should look at parsers which have
already been applied to other document languages (e.g. tex, html etc...)
or at least suppor
This is something I would like to see adopted by the org community as well.
One
of my main reasons is to allow other languages to be able to at least, given
the
proper configuration information (for TODO keywords, etc), to be able to deal
with org files. I am not quite sure where the lines s
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question.
>
> At FOSDEM, someone asked me if there was a formal description of the
> structure of Org files, in some language
> that would be the input for a parser (or parser generator?) so that Org
> file could be easily parsed.
>
> Unfortunately I did not catch the name of t
Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi Mohamed,
>
> The comment prompt you mentioned actually isn't babel specific but is
> raised by the `comment-region' function which is used by babel to
> comment out links. Look at the documentation for `comment-region'
> (below) which has information on va
Julien Fantin writes:
> Hi list, hi Eric,
>
> I've been using ob-C to go through the K&R book, and I've noticed a few
> annoyances along the way.
>
> * Use of the captial C identifier
>
> Support functions are defined as ob-C-*. In consequence, I need to
> #+begin_src C to get a block to execute
Eric S Fraga writes:
> "Eric Schulte" writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> That said, I agree that in examples like yours above the returned value
>> should be a table given that the ":results table" is explicitly stated.
>> I've just pushed up a patch after which the following is possible.
>
> Eric,
>
> It w
Hi Shaun,
Thanks for sharing this patch, I have just applied it. And yes, this is
my preferred format for sharing a patch.
Sorry about the delay, I missed this email initially. Adding a
"[babel]" tag to the subject line of emails related to Babel code will
help ensure that they are noticed.
Th
Renier Marchand writes:
> It is a cool idea yes, but I quickly learned that it also have its
> problems, i.e. you cant really create nice column formulas because the
> reference is not aware of "the current row" etc.
>
> The biggest problem as I see it is that emacs-lisp does not support
> the co
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Peter Frings wrote:
>
>>
>> On 15 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 15, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>>>
Am 15.04.2011 09:58, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question.
>
It is a cool idea yes, but I quickly learned that it also have its
problems, i.e. you cant really create nice column formulas because the
reference is not aware of "the current row" etc.
The biggest problem as I see it is that emacs-lisp does not support
the complex data type as lisp (natively) do
However, now looking at it, maybe my top agenda calendar should skip
deadlines or just have todays since I have a larger list below. Hmm,
going to have to think about this some more but I am really liking
this start.
Matt
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Matthew Sauer
wrote:
> I have been worki
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:58:09 +0200, Carsten Dominik
> said:
CD> Unfortunately I did not catch the name of the format description
CD> language that could be used for something, not did I catch the name
CD> of the person who talked to me.
Another option, besides those mentioned, is prob
I have been working on learning and playing with some lisp and looking
through the amazing powerfulness of orgmode. This is my new favorite
agenda command. I use it as the right hand side of my startup buffers
(I have two). On the left I have my refile.org file (the "I am not
sure where I am put
Hi list, hi Eric,
I've been using ob-C to go through the K&R book, and I've noticed a few
annoyances along the way.
* Use of the captial C identifier
Support functions are defined as ob-C-*. In consequence, I need to
#+begin_src C to get a block to execute, because #+begin_src c fails
with "No
Antlr is just another in a long line of lexical parsers. I still remember
the original lex (for lexical analysis), which in combination with yacc (for
parsing and grammar) could make pretty much any conventional programming
language.
Then GNU came up with Flex (fast lex) and Bison (instead of yacc
On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:58, Christian Egli wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> At FOSDEM, someone asked me if there was a formal description of the
>> structure of Org files, in some language that would be the input for a
>> parser (or parser generator?) so that Org file could be easily parsed.
Carsten Dominik writes:
> At FOSDEM, someone asked me if there was a formal description of the
> structure of Org files, in some language that would be the input for a
> parser (or parser generator?) so that Org file could be easily parsed.
Maybe the person was talking about antlr[1], "ANother T
Patch 749 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/749/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C1302732325-21162-1-git-send-email-bernt%40norang.ca%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
> Content-Type: text/p
Patch 654 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/654/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C87tyfhf6gr.fsf%40gnu.org%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> MIM
Patch 748 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/748/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C1302696730-14326-1-git-send-email-bernt%40norang.ca%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
> Content-Type: text/p
Patch 746 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/746/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C1302614330-23496-1-git-send-email-manuel.giraud%40univ-nantes.fr%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
> Content
On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Peter Frings wrote:
>
> On 15 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> On Apr 15, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>>
>>> Am 15.04.2011 09:58, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
Hi,
I have a question.
At FOSDEM, someone asked me if
On 15 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>
>> Am 15.04.2011 09:58, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a question.
>>>
>>> At FOSDEM, someone asked me if there was a formal description of the
>>> structure of Org files
On Apr 15, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
> Am 15.04.2011 09:58, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question.
>>
>> At FOSDEM, someone asked me if there was a formal description of the
>> structure of Org files, in some language that would be the input for a
>> parser (
"Eric Schulte" writes:
[...]
> That said, I agree that in examples like yours above the returned value
> should be a table given that the ":results table" is explicitly stated.
> I've just pushed up a patch after which the following is possible.
Eric,
It would appear that this change you've ma
On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Philipp M. wrote:
> On 15 April 2011 05:04, Matt Lundin wrote:
> "Philipp M." writes:
>
> > It would be the proper way to set up timetables for a semester.
> > The workaround I use is mentioned in the FAQ http://orgmode.org/worg/
> > org-faq.html#org-diary-class
>
On 15 April 2011 05:04, Matt Lundin wrote:
> "Philipp M." writes:
>
> > It would be the proper way to set up timetables for a semester.
> > The workaround I use is mentioned in the FAQ http://orgmode.org/worg/
> > org-faq.html#org-diary-class
> > Unfortunately the FAQ doesn't state that putting
Am 15.04.2011 09:58, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question.
>
> At FOSDEM, someone asked me if there was a formal description of the
> structure of Org files, in some language that would be the input for a parser
> (or parser generator?) so that Org file could be easily parsed.
>
Hi,
I have a question.
At FOSDEM, someone asked me if there was a formal description of the structure
of Org files, in some language that would be the input for a parser (or parser
generator?) so that Org file could be easily parsed.
Unfortunately I did not catch the name of the format descrip
49 matches
Mail list logo
