Hello,
The reason why auto-completion with auto-complete-mode is slow might be
because of
flyspell-mode. Do you use it by default on org-mode by any chance?
I tried disabling flyspell-mode and got good results.(Not as fast as
pabbrev-mode but fast enough)
I also posted an issue here
https://gith
:: Eric S Fraga writes:
ESF> On Tuesday, 22 Mar 2016 at 13:59, Samuel W. Flint wrote: [...]
>> I agree, this does sound useful, but I think some other syntax would
>> be more useful (LaTeX Equations are kinda important to me).
ESF> I'm not sure what you mean. LaTeX equations are already availab
On 2016-03-18, at 17:51, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> I'm now reading org-read-date-analyze to be able to enable US military
> format for hours (e.g., 2100 instead of 21:00). This is potentially
> very useful (at least for me), since I'll be able to enter the hour with
> one hand (colon is on shif
> the org-babel-execute:scheme function looks for a :scheme header
> argument (otherwise uses the geiser-default-implementation).
You're right. I went through ob-scheme.el. org-babel-execute:scheme does
look for a :scheme header argument.
But, my original problem was different. I was looking for
On Tuesday, 22 Mar 2016 at 15:18, John Kitchin wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, the thoughts are still a little loose in my head. I want to try
> it, and write a paper with it, and see if it was useful enough to write
> another paper that way ;)
I look forward to hearing about your experiences. It's alwa
Samuel W. Flint writes:
> :: Eric S Fraga writes:
>
> ESF> On Monday, 21 Mar 2016 at 21:51, John Kitchin wrote:
>>> Suppose one wanted to add a new org-element/syntax to org-mode. Where
>>> would one start?
>
> ESF> I cannot help but I am curious:
>
>>> I am interested in something like the follo
On Tuesday, 22 Mar 2016 at 13:59, Samuel W. Flint wrote:
[...]
> I agree, this does sound useful, but I think some other syntax would be
> more useful (LaTeX Equations are kinda important to me).
I'm not sure what you mean. LaTeX equations are already available and
the mhchem package is particu
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Interesting points raised in your last email. And also reminiscent of
> the citation discussion... for better or for worse ;-)
True, I recall saying or thinking something to the effect of how
"someone" might consider how to use that expanded syntax ;)
> org currently has
:: Eric S Fraga writes:
ESF> On Monday, 21 Mar 2016 at 21:51, John Kitchin wrote:
>> Suppose one wanted to add a new org-element/syntax to org-mode. Where
>> would one start?
ESF> I cannot help but I am curious:
>> I am interested in something like the following syntax: $(arbitrary
>> stuff insi
Interesting points raised in your last email. And also reminiscent of
the citation discussion... for better or for worse ;-)
org currently has effective support for literate programming with babel;
however, it has only rudimentary support for data: tables and properties
(and maybe tags). More an
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Tuesday, 22 Mar 2016 at 07:34, John Kitchin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> the elisp link is a good idea, but I am looking into an idea for a
>> chemical markup language where you might have a $(molecule + data)$ and
>> reaction descriptions $(molecule -> new molecules)$ that bec
On Tuesday, 22 Mar 2016 at 07:34, John Kitchin wrote:
[...]
> the elisp link is a good idea, but I am looking into an idea for a
> chemical markup language where you might have a $(molecule + data)$ and
> reaction descriptions $(molecule -> new molecules)$ that become
> machine-readable as well.
Hi
I have
,
| #+PROPERTY: header-args :eval no-export
| ...
`
and other header arguments set at the beginning of my document.
But now I have one subtree, which I want to eval on export. Is there a
way of un-setting the :eval header argument for one subtree or is there
a special (defaul
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Monday, 21 Mar 2016 at 21:51, John Kitchin wrote:
>> Suppose one wanted to add a new org-element/syntax to org-mode. Where
>> would one start?
>
> I cannot help but I am curious:
>
>> I am interested in something like the following syntax:
>> $(arbitrary stuff inside the
John Kitchin writes:
> Suppose one wanted to add a new org-element/syntax to org-mode. Where
> would one start?
>
> I am interested in something like the following syntax:
>
> $(arbitrary stuff inside the sexp)$
>
> with a mechanism to call an export function to transcode it.
>
> Any pointers to
On Monday, 21 Mar 2016 at 21:51, John Kitchin wrote:
> Suppose one wanted to add a new org-element/syntax to org-mode. Where
> would one start?
I cannot help but I am curious:
> I am interested in something like the following syntax:
> $(arbitrary stuff inside the sexp)$
Given the power of lisp,
On Mon, 21. Mar 23:55, Arun Isaac wrote:
In addition to requiring 'geiser-install you have to set the
geiser-active-implementations variable, e.g.:
Customizing the geiser-active-implementations variable works for
me. Thank you.
alternatively there is a :scheme header argument for src blocks
17 matches
Mail list logo
