idk if this is already possible.
in the org mark ring, i want to keep a history of places gone, and go
backward and forward in it.
is this a coherent request that is not already implemented?
I've sent off for the FSF form so I can get that process started, and
I've amended my patch according to the guidelines (attached).
Jack Henahan writes:
> I tested that `org-clock-display` and the clocktable work as expected
> when `org-clock-display-default-range` is set to `untilnow`.
> `org-c
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
I tested that `org-clock-display` and the clocktable work as expected
when `org-clock-display-default-range` is set to `untilnow`.
`org-clock-sum-custom` also appears to function as intended. If I'm
reading things correctly, the `untilnow` case is the only one that ought
t
Achim Gratz writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> Actually, I have another idea. We could implement a function generating
>> the manual, right in Org core. It can be useful for both packaging, like
>> the above, and for developers, who can update the manual on the fly.
>
> That should go into mk/o
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Actually, I have another idea. We could implement a function generating
> the manual, right in Org core. It can be useful for both packaging, like
> the above, and for developers, who can update the manual on the fly.
That should go into mk/org-fixup.el then. I am not aw
Jack Henahan writes:
> Apologies again, didn't update the commit hash properly. I swear this is
> the last one. :|
Thank you. However, I'm surprised that `org-clock-special-range' callers
handle a nil start date. Have you tested it?
If that's true, we don't need the -5 hack at all. Returnin
Hello,
Achim Gratz writes:
Thank you for your answer. Some comments follow.
> The lack of complaints is unlikely to mean that everybody tried it and
> found nothing to complain about.
I didn't imply anything like that.
> The export to texi is still relatively slow,
I don't think it is much o
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
Hello,
"manual.org" was updated a month ago, and, so far, nobody
complained
about it. So, I think it's a good time to discuss about what
could be
done next.
The first obvious step is to move the file into "doc/"
directory. Then
I assume we could delete "org.texi" a
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> "manual.org" was updated a month ago, and, so far, nobody complained
> about it. So, I think it's a good time to discuss about what could be
> done next.
The lack of complaints is unlikely to mean that everybody tried it and
found nothing to complain about. I haven't had
Jack Henahan writes:
Apologies again, didn't update the commit hash properly. I swear this is
the last one. :|
> Jack Henahan writes:
>
> Modified patch attached to use my list mail rather than my work one.
>
>> To that end, I've attached a patch for review which removes
>> `org-clock--oldest-d
Jack Henahan writes:
Modified patch attached to use my list mail rather than my work one.
> To that end, I've attached a patch for review which removes
> `org-clock--oldest-date`, replacing its only use with `nil`, and
> altering the logic where it's actually used to account for this case and
>
To that end, I've attached a patch for review which removes
`org-clock--oldest-date`, replacing its only use with `nil`, and
altering the logic where it's actually used to account for this case and
give a sensible-ish value of the year -5 for the start time in
`org-special-range`. Before the d
Hello,
"manual.org" was updated a month ago, and, so far, nobody complained
about it. So, I think it's a good time to discuss about what could be
done next.
The first obvious step is to move the file into "doc/" directory. Then
I assume we could delete "org.texi" and "org.info" there and generate
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
>
> * Foo
> ** Bar
> *** a
> *** b
> ** Archive :ARCHIVE:
> *** a
> *** b
> *** c
>
> Expected visibility when using C-c C-k on Foo:
>
> * Foo
> ** Bar
> *** a
> *** b
> ** Archive :ARCHIVE:...
>
> Actual:
>
> * Foo
> ** Bar
> *** a
> *** b
> ** Archive :ARCHIVE:
> *** a
Hello,
Stefan Monnier writes:
> I think a good solution should be along these lines: only add the `k'
> binding if the `k' key is currently "unbound" (or more generally does
> nothing more than signal an error, since `k' is probably bound to
> something like `undefined'). Of course, this care s
Hi Nicolas,
> "N" == Nicolas Goaziou writes:
N> Hello, Roland Fehrenbacher writes:
>> is there any option or other customization to keep the outline of
>> an org buffer (uncollapsed parts of the tree) after the buffer
>> has been reverted (org-mode 9.0.1, emacs 25.3.2)? In
Hello,
Jack Henahan writes:
> I've run into a performance issue in `org-clock` which I've narrowed
> down to being caused by the calculation in the defconst for
> `org-clock--oldest-date`. In particular, invoking `org-clock-in` or
> eagerly loading `org-clock` on init incurs a 21(!) second delay
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Allen Li writes:
>
>> C-c C-k unfolds archived headings. I am using it/interpreting it as a
>> subtree variant to S-TAB, which shows the CONTENTS headlines only view
>> without unfolding archived headings.
>
> Could you provide
18 matches
Mail list logo
