Re: [O] minimal testing setup for pdf export?

2019-08-26 Thread Ken Mankoff
On 2019-08-27 at 03:20 +02, Matt Price wrote... > Can someone point me to a minimal setup for testing PDF export with "emacs > -Q"? I am unable to produce a pdf with default settings and I am pretty > sure that the latex is invalid... but I'm having trouble testing it since > I 9still) know so

[O] minimal testing setup for pdf export?

2019-08-26 Thread Matt Price
Can someone point me to a minimal setup for testing PDF export with "emacs -Q"? I am unable to produce a pdf with default settings and I am pretty sure that the latex is invalid... but I'm having trouble testing it since I 9still) know so little about latex. Thanks everyone! Matt

Re: [O] org-drill extremely slow with Org 9.2.5

2019-08-26 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "OK" == Oleh Krehel writes: OK> I noticed org-drill being slow three years ago when I tried to OK> learn it. So I wrote my own package: OK> https://github.com/abo-abo/pamparam/. It's quite fast: it takes OK> 0.6s to sync my 3300 cards from the master Org file. And

Re: [O] [bug] Export to latex truncates long subsections (WE attached)

2019-08-26 Thread Julius Dittmar
Hi Vladimir, I see two problems in the generated LaTeX-file you'd need to address. First, LaTeX has problems handling URLs in section (or subsection) headers. That's one of the reasons LaTeX chokes on the second run of that file -- it's only partially generated, not completely. The second is

Re: [O] [bug] Export to latex truncates long subsections (WE attached)

2019-08-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Vladimir Nikishkin writes: > I have a problem in that when I try to export an .org file into latex/pdf, > long sections are not wrapped to the next page, but are truncated instead. > > The result is on the picture (points 10.34 to 10.37 missing), and the > (not)working example is