Re: [O] org-mode vs pandoc export
Hello, Many thanks Emmanuel for your help. Indeed, I'm using org-ref and scimax, all the nice tools that John offers very generously to the community; org-ref is so convenient that now I cannot imagine to work without it. Maybe John has the solution for future exports. (I did not succeed to export in odt because of links, bibliography links.) Finally the best result was done directly via pandoc, via a command line like this one: pandoc -s --filter pandoc-crossref --bibliography=reforg.bib --csl=ieee.csl -o mydocument.odt mydocument.org But pandoc-crossref never worked and I had also to make png images for tables. The best solution that I found was to install libreoffice-texmaths. I just had to enter "sudo aptitude install libreoffice-texmaths" via my GNU/Linux Debian sid, but for other OS, the package is here https://extensions.libreoffice.org/extensions/texmaths-1 and it works. Of course the output is less pretty than the pdf via the tex life I hope that it will help other people. Best wishes, Jo. PS: The publisher is in philosophy...
[O] moving an entry from one date tree to another
Hello, Is there an easy way to move an entry from one date tree to another? I guess I need two things: - figure out where in the date tree the entry is, - create the parents if needed, and move it there. This might be a more general question: given an entry in some file, can I move it recreating the path form the root of the file to another file? Thanks, Alan signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [O] org-mode vs pandoc export
I suppose that you need org-mode to use Babel features (code and/or code execution results intermixed with your paper's text). I have had trouble with .dot exporting using the builtin .dot exporter, but can't, for the life of me, remembering if my troubles were cross- reference or citations-related (an academic paper usually needs both...). I noted that the references done via John Kitchin's excellent org-ref didn't export to .dot. As far as I can tell, ox-pandoc does its own numbering (generating an intermediate temporary file that I never managed to catch) and does not use pandoc-crossref. ISTR that a "clever" use of org-ref allows to number equations... in LaTeX output. I also STR that it doesn't work in .docx output. John Kitchin (the org-ref author) thinks that the key is to generate a correct \LaTeX file and to export that to .docx via pandoc. At this point, writing a \LaTeX file with pandoc export in mind is probably your best bet. There exist (limited) alternatives to the Babel features of org-mode: - knitr (supports R and Python code in "session"mode, i. e. continuity between code chunks), - SageTeX (post-processing in a single Sagemath run ; can include code for a variety of math software, including R), - Pythontex (postprocessor, supports Python, Sage, Octave and a couple other, but not R ; a clever use of knitr and Pythontex is possible). Possible alternative: Markdown + Codebraid (supports a hanful of langiages, including R and (development branch) Sage). This should accept pandoc-crossref numbering. But it's Markdown, with limited formatting abilities... So, we have an array of partial solutions, none universal. Pick your poison... Out of curiosity: in which domain still exist journal publishers not accepting \LaTeX ? I suspect medicine... HTH, -- Emmanuel Charpentier
Re: [O] Tables: Exclude headings in Row Number?
Well, the code for this is in `org-table-overlay-coordinate-overlays' in org-table.el. There isn't an existing flag for your request, but of course you can play with that code as you like. For example, if the `(setq ih (1+ ih))' is changed to `(setq id 0 ih (1+ ih))', the row numbers will start again from 1 after each hline. Best wishes, Neil On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 04:24, Nathan Neff wrote: > I also re-read my initial question and your response *does* address my > mis phrased question. To rephrase my question, I have a table > with these values: > > | heading col 0 | heading col 1 | > | -- | - | > | A | B > | C | D > > I found the org-table-toggle-coordinate-overlays > which displays an overlay showing the row number: > > https://www.evernote.com/l/AOJvD5ty6RRIBYAcSWV-047CKCHT5NIAhl8 > > I would like to know if there's a way to influence > org-table-toggle-coordinate-overlays > (e.g. some flag like "don't count rows before headings") > > Thanks, > --Nate > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 10:22 PM Nathan Neff > wrote: > >> Hi Neil, >> >> Unfortunately, no - This code will print the number of rows in my table - >> it does >> not add a column to my table, with numbering starting at the first row >> under the >> headline. >> >> I really like the example, where I can mess with the table using lisp >> though - thank >> you! >> --Nate >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:13 AM Neil Jerram wrote: >> >>> Does this answer your question? >>> >>> #+NAME: tt >>> | num | ID | >>> |-+| >>> | 1 | A | >>> | 2 | B | >>> | 3 | C | >>> | 4 || >>> | 5 | E | >>> >>> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var tt=tt >>> (length tt) >>> #+END_SRC >>> >>> #+RESULTS: >>> : 5 >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> Neil >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 18:39, Nathan Neff wrote: >>> Hello all, I have a table like this: | ID | || | 2 | | 3 | and I want to know how many rows there are w/o the ID heading and w/o the horizontal separator. I found the org-table-toggle-coordinate-overlays which displays an overlay showing the row number: https://www.evernote.com/l/AOJvD5ty6RRIBYAcSWV-047CKCHT5NIAhl8 However, the heading is included in the row number (which makes sense). Is there a way to ignore lines above a heading (or mark a heading in some way? I found a way to add a seq. number by using Calc [1] but I was wondering if there's a way to tell the org-table-toggle-coordinate-overlays not to count the heading. Thanks, --Nate [1] | num | ID | |-+| | 1 | A | | 2 | B | | 3 | C | | 4 || | 5 | E | #+TBLFM: $1=vlen(@I..0) https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9267050/how-to-achieve-a-row-index-column-in-emacs-org-mode-using-a-calc-column-rule
Re: [O] Bug: COMMENT and noweb-ref
Sebastian Miele writes: > In the following days I will try to fix it and write a regression test. > > However, in the unlikely case that this is a feature and not a bug, > please let me know. Please also let me know, if anyone is already on it. > > Sebastian Miele writes: > >> org-babel-tangle on >> >> * A >> >> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :tangle yes :noweb yes >> ;; A >> <> >> #+END_SRC >> >> * COMMENT B >> >> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :noweb-ref B >> ;; B >> #+END_SRC >> [...] >> >> produces a file with A and B in it. Expected: Just A. Changing >> >> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :noweb-ref B >> ;; B >> #+END_SRC >> >> to >> >> # #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :noweb-ref B >> # ;; B >> # #+END_SRC >> >> does yield the expected result. Your expectation looks right to me. I guess nobody thought about this case before. Happy hacking, -- Marco
Re: [O] Bug: COMMENT and noweb-ref
In the following days I will try to fix it and write a regression test. However, in the unlikely case that this is a feature and not a bug, please let me know. Please also let me know, if anyone is already on it. Sebastian Miele writes: > org-babel-tangle on > > * A > > #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :tangle yes :noweb yes > ;; A > <> > #+END_SRC > > * COMMENT B > > #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :noweb-ref B > ;; B > #+END_SRC > > * COMMENT C > > #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :tangle yes > ;; C > #+END_SRC > > produces a file with A and B in it. Expected: Just A. Changing > > #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :noweb-ref B > ;; B > #+END_SRC > > to > > # #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :noweb-ref B > # ;; B > # #+END_SRC > > does yield the expected result.
[O] org-mode vs pandoc export
Hello, Does someone succeeds to export scientific paper with numbering formulas from LateX to odt or docx? I have tried to use pandoc, but pandoc-crossref does not work... (I hate these publishers that do not know LaTeX... ) Best wishes, Jo.
Re: [O] Bug: Operator associativity problem [9.1.9 (release_9.1.9-65-g5e4542 @ /usr/share/emacs/26.1/lisp/org/)]
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:16:26 +0200, Justus Winter > said: Justus> "Fraga, Eric" writes: >> On Wednesday, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:50, Justus Winter wrote: >>> I noticed a operator associativity problem when evaluating formulas in >>> tables. To reproduce, enter: >>> >>> | :=6/2*3 | >>> >>> And evaluate the formula. This results in: >>> >>> | 1 | >>> #+TBLFM: @1$1=6/2*3 >> >> Yes, this is a property (feature, ?) of Emacs Calc. Justus> Wow! Re-reading the org-mode documentation I see that it is prominently Justus> mentioned indeed, and that it is an precedence thing, not an Justus> associativity one. See 'calc-multiplication-has-precedence' Robert signature.asc Description: PGP signature
