On 2019-10-11 at 00:13 +02, Tim Cross wrote...
> My concern with this suggestion is that I think it my result in
> 'surprising' or unexpected results for users.
I hope nobody would be surprised if they C-u C-u C-c C-c'd ! :) Just as they
shouldn't be surprised if the :cache is ignored, if run
stardiviner writes:
> This is really a helpful sidebar package. Thanks :) I like it very much.
>
> Hope can add an command to toggle it. I found I have to manually close it.
FYI, I just added some toggle commands. Thanks for the suggestion.
My concern with this suggestion is that I think it my result in
'surprising' or unexpected results for users. I use tangle a fair
bit, but evaluate source blocks far less. I use :tangle no to mean do
not tangle - no if, but or maybe - if the block has :tangle no, then I
don not expect the block
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Charles Berry wrote:
>
>>
>> This could work in theory, but doesn't for bash on my system. And (I think)
>> with this method tables of output are not then injected back into the Org
>> buffer that can be exported as part of the document.
>
Of course!
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
> Hi Charles,
>
> On 2019-10-10 at 18:22 +02, Berry, Charles wrote...
>> If the language mode you use supports of evaluation of the src edit
>> buffer (e.g. ESS[R], Python), you can issue
>>
>> C-c C-v v C-c C-b
>>
>> for ESS[R] or
>>
Hi Charles,
On 2019-10-10 at 18:22 +02, Berry, Charles wrote...
> If the language mode you use supports of evaluation of the src edit
> buffer (e.g. ESS[R], Python), you can issue
>
> C-c C-v v C-c C-b
>
> for ESS[R] or
>
> C-c C-v v C-c C-c
>
> for Python (I think)
>
> The commands will expand
> On Oct 9, 2019, at 11:04 PM, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think that even when ":eval no" is set, eval should happen if the user
> explicitly requests it.
If the language mode you use supports of evaluation of the src edit buffer
(e.g. ESS[R], Python), you can issue
C-c C-v v
Please.I tried to explain myself, but I see the more I explain myself, and write - the more people would assume the things that not correspond to reality.I not even started the work, or shown changes. And I already received a bunch of recommendations and people being concern, and people confusing
Hello,
Anton Latukha writes:
> Well, after re-reading my letter - it obviously probably comes off as
> being very strong and ambitious. I am pretty cool-headed about
> everything. I am aware of that I need to gradual do ideally clean and
> 100% compatible changes, I looked at the code - and the
Hello,
I think that even when ":eval no" is set, eval should happen if the user
explicitly requests it.
The use case is that I have code that takes an unreasonable amount of compute
time to run it in Emacs (e.g. a full day of compute time). I think even with
:async this type of code should be
10 matches
Mail list logo
