Bruce,
from the outside here. just wondering.
> Maybe this should be flipped, so we can still have the flexibility to
> combine both, but default is local has precedence?
>
> So in other words, one has to explicitly turn on the global
> bibliography locally.
>
> org-cite-global-bibliography:
Hi,
In the course of working on a PR for org-super-agenda [0], we found that
a recent change to Org, commit 81c7a2dee8 [1], causes a misalignment in
the way time lines in the agenda are displayed. The org-super-agenda
test suite shows this change when results from Org 9.4 and 9.4.6 are
compared.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 11:36 AM Titus von der Malsburg
wrote:
> Sure, that’s always possible. However, my suspicion is that users in the
> majority of cases want /just/ the local bibliography when they specify one.
> If true, a better default would be to only return the local bibliography.
On 2021-07-25 Sun 17:14, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 10:47 AM Titus von der Malsburg
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m starting to learn about org’s new capabilities for citations and
>> bibliographies. Exciting, and great work!
>>
>> Two suggestions/requests:
>>
>> 1.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 10:47 AM Titus von der Malsburg
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m starting to learn about org’s new capabilities for citations and
> bibliographies. Exciting, and great work!
>
> Two suggestions/requests:
>
> 1. `org-cite-list-bibliography-files' returns the bibliographies
Hi Karl,
I use a wrapper around org-map-entries to create custom tables.
Calling the wrapper takes a configuration for each table column. This is quite
nice for other use cases as well, to e.g. convert properties (":TASK_PROGRESS:
75") into graphical representations like harvey balls.
Hi,
I’m starting to learn about org’s new capabilities for citations and
bibliographies. Exciting, and great work!
Two suggestions/requests:
1. `org-cite-list-bibliography-files' returns the bibliographies defined
locally and the globally defined bibliographies together. I propose to only
Tim Cross writes:
> Arthur Miller writes:
>
>> Tim Cross writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when you are editing source blocks are you using org-edit-special, normally
>>> bound to C-c ') or are you just editing the source blocks directly within
>>> the
>>> org buffer?
>> No I don't narrow.
>
> Note
Arthur Miller writes:
> Tim Cross writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when you are editing source blocks are you using org-edit-special, normally
>> bound to C-c ') or are you just editing the source blocks directly within the
>> org buffer?
> No I don't narrow.
Note that org-edit-special isn't really
Karl Voit writes:
> I do have a dynamic block table like this:
> ...
> | NEXT| [0/0] proj bar | bar | :bar:project: |
>
> Is there a way to get the ID column with working ID links such as:
> ...
> | NEXT| [0/0] proj bar | id:bar | :bar:project: |
You may customise
Tim Cross writes:
> Hi,
>
> when you are editing source blocks are you using org-edit-special, normally
> bound to C-c ') or are you just editing the source blocks directly within the
> org buffer?
No I don't narrow.
> The functionality you are referring to sounds like eldoc minor mode.
Yes it
Hi Karl,
> > Would it work for you to use the "<>"?
> >
> > *** <> barheading
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :ID: [[bar][barheading]]
> > :END:
> > /Kris
>
> I'm afraid not because the dynamic block would duplicate the
> target definition and not generating a link.
OK, I see.
If you do find a solution
Hi,
* Kristian Grönberg wrote:
>
> I didn't read your question properly.
> Would it work for you to use the "<>"?
>
> *** <> barheading
>:PROPERTIES:
>:ID: [[bar][barheading]]
>:END:
>
> /Kris
I'm afraid not because the dynamic block would duplicate the
target definition and not generating a
13 matches
Mail list logo
