Re: org-table-blank-field key binding removal

Hi all Then Version 9.6 (or forget) seems right to me. Michael

Re: How to keep getting org updates

hi, Tim, > I think it is always a mistake to google for answers without first > checking what Emacs has in the built-in documentation and manual. What > is in the Emacs manual or docstrings for variables and functions is > guaranteed to be accurate for the version of Emacs your running. What >

Re: org-table-blank-field key binding removal

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: > >> Michael Brand writes: >> >>> The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version >>> 9.4. >> >> Right, I agree this change should have come with a NEWS entry, though >> 0c4e844c8 (Remove default binding for

Re: org-table-blank-field key binding removal

Kyle Meyer writes: > Michael Brand writes: > >> The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version 9.4. > > Right, I agree this change should have come with a NEWS entry, though > 0c4e844c8 (Remove default binding for org-table-blank-field, 2021-04-28) > is from the 9.5

Re: org-table-blank-field key binding removal

Michael Brand writes: > The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version 9.4. Right, I agree this change should have come with a NEWS entry, though 0c4e844c8 (Remove default binding for org-table-blank-field, 2021-04-28) is from the 9.5 release not 9.4. However, 9.5 is

[OT] Ebib file field [was: New user experience ct'd: exporting citations into LaTeX (9.5)]

On Wed, Oct 13 2021, Leszek Wroński wrote: > thank you very much for your responses to my previous query. (I will > study the ebib package more closely; as of now it does not seem to > work with the file fields in my Mendeley-created .bib file. This can probably be remedied with a little Elisp.

[PATCH] org-manual.org: org-cite additions

This is a minor patch to address the most obvious missing pieces that have confused people. Please feel free to modify; I don't really have any experience with this, and don't have a lot of time. For example, I'm not clear on conventions for instructing people whether and how to load a package.

Re:Re: New user experience ct'd: exporting citations into LaTeX (9.5)

#+print_bibliography seem to not document in info. (require 'oc-csl) is not too. -- 发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版 - Original Message - From: "Bruce D'Arcus" To: "Leszek Wroński" Cc: org-mode-email Sent: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:34:50 -0400 Subject: Re: New user experience ct'd: exporting

Re: New user experience ct'd: exporting citations into LaTeX (9.5)

Try adding this where you want the bibliography. #+print_bibliography: On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 5:27 PM Leszek Wroński wrote: > > Guys, > > thank you very much for your responses to my previous query. (I will > study the ebib package more closely; as of now it does not seem to > work with the

New user experience ct'd: exporting citations into LaTeX (9.5)

Guys, thank you very much for your responses to my previous query. (I will study the ebib package more closely; as of now it does not seem to work with the file fields in my Mendeley-created .bib file. (Yes, I promise will stop using Mendeley.)) I wanted to try the two LaTeX export processors

Re: How to keep getting org updates

Galaxy Being writes: > Appreciate the help and encouragement. This pinning business ... seems like > musical chairs with different suggestions here and > there. Should I use this suggestion, or maybe this one, or...? And where is > the maintained list of packages? I see > .../elpa/archives/

Re: org-table-blank-field key binding removal

Hi all The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version 9.4. Michael

Re: Manual suggestion and experience report from a new user (citation processors, 9.5)

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:33:16 -0400, Leszek Wroński wrote: Guys, I've been using Emacs for about 20 years, but I'm only now starting to seriously explore the Org-mode, since I read about the new citation options. I'd like to report my initial experience since maybe this could lead to some

Re: Manual suggestion and experience report from a new user (citation processors, 9.5)

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, 1:41 PM Leszek Wroński wrote: > Thank you very much! I will explore more. The keys are correct. On > reopening the .org file, the behavior is now consistent: clicking on > any citation does nothing :-) Try org-open-at-point. That at least should work. Bruce

Re: Manual suggestion and experience report from a new user (citation processors, 9.5)

Thank you very much! I will explore more. The keys are correct. On reopening the .org file, the behavior is now consistent: clicking on any citation does nothing :-) I will try to experiment with your processor. I did manage to configure org-ref-cite to open PDFs a few months ago, but when trying

Re: Manual suggestion and experience report from a new user (citation processors, 9.5)

Am Mittwoch, dem 13. Oktober 2021 schrieb Leszek Wroński: > Ideally I'd like a click on a citation to open the PDF whose location > is stored in the 'file' field of the .bib entry: is there an easy way > to achieve this? [I've tried various ways of doing this in the last > 10+ years, including

Re: Manual suggestion and experience report from a new user (citation processors, 9.5)

Forgot to reply-all ... On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 11:36 AM Leszek Wroński wrote: > I've been using Emacs for about 20 years, but I'm only now starting to > seriously explore the Org-mode, since I read about the new citation > options. I'd like to report my initial experience since maybe this >

Manual suggestion and experience report from a new user (citation processors, 9.5)

Guys, I've been using Emacs for about 20 years, but I'm only now starting to seriously explore the Org-mode, since I read about the new citation options. I'd like to report my initial experience since maybe this could lead to some amendments to the manual? Anyway: I installed Org 9.5 from Melpa

Re: How to keep getting org updates

Appreciate the help and encouragement. This pinning business ... seems like musical chairs with different suggestions here and there. Should I use this suggestion, or maybe this

Re: Customization of IDs generation method

Ypo writes: > How would the "New option org-id-ts-format" work? > > I added to my init.el these lines with no result (sorry if I am > commiting heresy): > > (defcustom org-id-ts-format "%Y-%m-%d-T%H-%M-%S.%6N" >   "Timestamp format for IDs generated using `ts' `org-id-method'. > The format

bug#51167: 29.0.50; org-indent-line broken

On 13/10/2021 01:35, Kévin Le Gouguec wrote: Andreas Röhler writes: With following stuff in org-mode buffer: * bla asd M-x org-indent-line RET on second line has no effect. Andreas, do the following settings make behavior consistent with you expectations? (add-hook 'org-mode-hook

Re: A minor suggestion about formatting citations

Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:54 AM Nicolas Goaziou > wrote: >> I don't think that's totally true. The additional space makes sense >> typographically, in particular when some suffix is associated to the >> key. > > Can you give an example of what you mean here?

Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Org 9.5: org-goto UI seems broken

On Wednesday, 13 Oct 2021 at 19:23, Max Nikulin wrote: > Does someone have settings that pins help buffer to particular > window/frame of location in a frame (e.g. bottom of "sidebar")? This is what I use, which is slightly more complex because I have a wide landscape monitor and a tall portrait

Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Org 9.5: org-goto UI seems broken

On 13/10/2021 16:44, Marco Wahl wrote: Clearly I'm for kicking out org-no-popups completely. Many details have been mentioned already. The big argument for that change for me is that the code gets simpler. I have no strong opinion. Second patch locally restoring `pop-up-windows' is more

Re: How to keep getting org updates

> The install instructions on the main org page were not very clear, to > say the least. yes, that does sound messy. sorry your experience was so unfortunate. i guess one question for the list: is there a general solution to the "20200912" > "9.5" issue? or, "now" that we are only distributing

Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Org 9.5: org-goto UI seems broken

Thanks Ihor! > Marco Wahl writes: > >> My feeling is that the "protection" is good intention but brings more >> harm than good. I think it's not a good idea to enforce a certain >> window setting. I guess the knowing user has an easier path to fine >> tune the org-goto user interface when

bug#51167: 29.0.50; org-indent-line broken

Andreas Röhler writes: > On 13.10.21 09:34, Kévin Le Gouguec wrote: >> >> "Modern" did not factor in; the goal was to have RET and C-j behave >> consistently in all major modes. > > That does not deliver an argument to change the meaning of RET. If there is a compelling argument that justifies

Re: org-beamer empty titles

To Eric and to Ihor, many thanks. My problem was already solved by Eric with the LateX magic trick, so, I consider now that the problem is solved. Best wishes, Jo. Le 13/10/2021 à 09:50, Ihor Radchenko a écrit : > Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > >> Maybe. I'm using presently Prelude Emacs and in

bug#51167: 29.0.50; org-indent-line broken

On 13.10.21 09:34, Kévin Le Gouguec wrote: Andreas Röhler writes: Sounds like a chain of confusion. A command called "indent-line" definitely should indent. org-indent-line indents just like every indentation function in every other major mode: if the syntactic convention calls for it, it

Re: org-beamer empty titles

Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > Maybe. I'm using presently Prelude Emacs and in elpa I have org-20210920/ > > What can I do? I guess https://prelude.emacsredux.com/en/latest/support/ ELPA does have the right Org mode version: http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/org.html

bug#51167: 29.0.50; org-indent-line broken

Andreas Röhler writes: > Sounds like a chain of confusion. > > A command called "indent-line" definitely should indent. org-indent-line indents just like every indentation function in every other major mode: if the syntactic convention calls for it, it indents or de-indents the current line;

Re: org-beamer empty titles

On Tuesday, 12 Oct 2021 at 17:35, Joseph Vidal-Rosset wrote: > Maybe. I'm using presently Prelude Emacs and in elpa I have org-20210920/ I don't know. Sorry. -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.60, Org release_9.5-93-gd87250 : Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096

Re: Best way to include METAPOST in ConTeXt exporter

Jason Ross writes: >> Or you can use "raw" results by default and format everything as you >> wish in your Org Babel module programatically. > > I'm not sure I understand this yet. Would this emit METAPOST code to the > Org buffer? Ideally, I'd like to emit METAPOST code if the backend is >

Re: Best way to include METAPOST in ConTeXt exporter

Jason Ross writes: > Here's a hook that modifies the source blocks to wrap their > output in #+BEGIN/END_METAPOST tags if the ConTeXt backend is used, > before Org Babel gets to them, but otherwise leaves them alone. > > I wonder if anyone has any better ideas of how to do this. I'm > modifying

bug#51167: 29.0.50; org-indent-line broken

On 12.10.21 20:35, Kévin Le Gouguec wrote: Andreas Röhler writes: With following stuff in org-mode buffer: * bla asd M-x org-indent-line RET on second line has no effect. Org 9.5 changed the default value of org-adapt-indentation from t to nil, as that seemed to be what a lot of users