Re: [Orgmode] Splitting mailing list

2011-02-27 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com wrote: I'm purely a user, but I would not be in favour of splitting the list. I find it interesting to have an insight into what the developers are doing, where org is headed. Use of a DEV tag would be good. I don't understand. If you like to read the

Re: [Orgmode] [OT] Have you also got hooked by Vim?

2011-01-13 Thread Andrew J. Korty
I've tried several times to use Viper, but I always give up. The usual showstopper is read-only Emacs modes with single-character key bindings, like MH-E. The d key deletes a message in an MH folder, but in vi, d deletes text to a target. So the obvious thing to do is turn Viper mode off in

Re: [Orgmode] Huge performance problems to open some Org files

2010-12-17 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Do you have flyspell-mode enabled? It caused such a performance hit I had to disable it for org files. ajk ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?

2010-12-17 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Torsten Wagner torsten.wag...@gmail.com wrote: Thinking of tags, I wonder why we use [Orgmode] since all mails coming from emacs-orgmode(a)gnu.org which is a strong indicator already. Not sure I agree with splitting the list, but the [Orgmode] tag is definitely superfluous. Who has a mail

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatically insert inactive timestamps

2010-12-09 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote: Andrew J. Korty a...@iu.edu wrote: Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: (add-hook 'org-insert-heading-hook 'bh/insert-heading-inactive-timestamp) Using org-insert-heading-hook is more elegant than my way, but I only want timestamps on TODO

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatically insert inactive timestamps

2010-12-08 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: (add-hook 'org-insert-heading-hook 'bh/insert-heading-inactive-timestamp) Using org-insert-heading-hook is more elegant than my way, but I only want timestamps on TODO entries, so I use #+begin_src emacs-lisp (defadvice org-insert-todo-heading (after

[Orgmode] [PATCH] Update all ++ repeaters in an entry (loop variables weren't getting reset)

2010-10-21 Thread Andrew J. Korty
See http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg30284.html. This patch is against release_7.01h. ajk --- lisp/org.el | 20 ++-- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el index d33bf4e..52e501e 100644 --- a/lisp/org.el

[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]

2010-09-18 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote: (setq org-agenda-custom-commands '((d Todos (incl. deadlines) todo ((org-deadline-warning-days 100) ;; change this as you wish (org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far Ah, brilliant. Thanks! Essentially this configuration

[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]

2010-09-17 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote: --8---cut here---start-8--- * TODO Review really important document DEADLINE: 2010-10-31 Sun -2m * TODO Review less important document DEADLINE: 2010-10-31 Sun --8---cut

[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]

2010-09-17 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote: If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp

[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]

2010-09-17 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote: Andrew J. Korty a...@iu.edu writes: Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote: --8---cut here---start-8--- * TODO Review really important document DEADLINE: 2010-10-31 Sun -2m * TODO Review less important document

[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]

2010-09-16 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Andrew J. Korty a...@iu.edu wrote: Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is marked DONE

[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]

2010-09-16 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp

[Orgmode] Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]

2010-09-15 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.

[Orgmode] [PATCH] Apply patch for hour/minute repeater support

2010-09-15 Thread Andrew J. Korty
This patch adds hour and minute granularity to repeaters. Let me know if there's interest in incorporating it, and I'll start the FSF paperwork process. Andrew Korty --- doc/org.texi |4 ++-- lisp/org-agenda.el |2 +- lisp/org.el| 27 +++ 3 files

[Orgmode] Bug: org-mhe creates corrupt link when Message-ID field contains newline [7.01trans]

2010-09-15 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Some MUAs insert a newline when rendering the Message-ID field: Message-ID: 98a78083733de040834c2b9e91b87fde0aa...@example.com The newline causes org-mhe-store-link to create a link that looks like [[mhe:%2Barchive# %2098a78083733de040834c2b9e91b87fde0aa...@example.com][subject]]

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Apply patch for hour/minute repeater support

2010-09-15 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Martin Pohlack m...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de wrote: On 14.09.2010 19:06, Andrew J. Korty wrote: This patch adds hour and minute granularity to repeaters. Let me know if there's interest in incorporating it, and I'll start the FSF paperwork process. There was a related discussion here: http

Re: [Orgmode] Speeding up agenda display

2010-01-02 Thread Andrew J. Korty
On Jan 2, 2010, at 02:50 , Carsten Dominik wrote: You can shave off another .5 seconds by pressing the selection key faster - Org spends 0.46 seconds to wait for your keypress :-) Good point. :-) I optimized things a bit more by caching skip positions and schedule, deadline, and tag data for

Re: [Orgmode] Speeding up agenda display

2010-01-02 Thread Andrew J. Korty
On Jan 2, 2010, at 14:37 , Carsten Dominik wrote: I have been thinking about caching often but always stopped implementing it because, being a plain text system, there is always the possibility that thinks are being changed behind the back of the cache. How are you handling updating the

Re: [Orgmode] Speeding up agenda display

2009-12-31 Thread Andrew J. Korty
. - Carsten On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Andrew J. Korty wrote: On Dec 30, 2009, at 14:20 , Carsten Dominik wrote: could you please also instrument your ajk/ functions for profiling and repeat the experiment? And show the code of all these functions, not only some (I am missing for example `ajk

[Orgmode] Speeding up agenda display

2009-12-30 Thread Andrew J. Korty
My agenda views take a couple seconds to build, and I'd like them to be faster. I'm posting a portion of configuration and some profiling results here in case anyone can see any opportunities for optimization. Some background: I don't use the diary at all -- this agenda view exists only to

Re: [Orgmode] Speeding up agenda display

2009-12-30 Thread Andrew J. Korty
On Dec 30, 2009, at 14:20 , Carsten Dominik wrote: could you please also instrument your ajk/ functions for profiling and repeat the experiment? And show the code of all these functions, not only some (I am missing for example `ajk/org-agenda-skip-if-due- soon' Yes to both -- see below

[Orgmode] [PATCH] Enable tags-todo agenda commands for MobileOrg

2009-11-19 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Not sure if these are disabled for a reason, but the following patch doesn't seem to cause any ill effects. They work without the patch in block agendas, just not on their own. ajk --- org-mobile.el~ 2009-11-19 13:45:54.0 -0500 +++ org-mobile.el 2009-11-19

Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode version 6.32b; org-remember only indents first line of %i substitution

2009-11-19 Thread Andrew J. Korty
cannot reproduce the problem you are describing. - Carsten On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Andrew J. Korty wrote: When %i appears indented in an org-remember template, each line of the text substituted is supposed to be indented. In my case, only the first line is being indented. Emacs

[Orgmode] Org-mode version 6.32b; org-remember only indents first line of %i substitution

2009-11-12 Thread Andrew J. Korty
When %i appears indented in an org-remember template, each line of the text substituted is supposed to be indented. In my case, only the first line is being indented. Emacs : GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0.0, NS apple- appkit-1038.11) of 2009-11-10 on phrygian Package:

Re: [Orgmode] emacsclient -e '(org-agenda)' sometimes displays stale agenda

2009-11-11 Thread Andrew J. Korty
On Nov 10, 2009, at 16:15 , Sebastian Rose wrote: Andrew J. Korty a...@iu.edu writes: Calling org-agenda from emacsclient doesn't always seem to generate a fresh agenda the way it does when called from a key binding or M-x. Anyone know why? I think the agenda is rebuild, if you quit

[Orgmode] emacsclient -e '(org-agenda)' sometimes displays stale agenda

2009-11-10 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Calling org-agenda from emacsclient doesn't always seem to generate a fresh agenda the way it does when called from a key binding or M-x. Anyone know why? ajk ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.

[Orgmode] Re: Invalid search bound (wrong side of point) using Remember

2007-11-16 Thread Andrew J. Korty
arose when %a was empty. -- Andrew J. Korty, Deputy Information Security Officer Office of the Vice President for Information Technology and CIO Indiana University ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list

[Orgmode] Re: tagging during creation

2007-11-05 Thread Andrew J. Korty
*) (org-set-buffer-todo-tags)) (org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c) -- Andrew J. Korty, Deputy Information Security Officer Office of the Vice President for Information Technology and CIO Indiana University ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list

[Orgmode] Re: Free `1' and `0' keys from the org-agenda interface ?

2007-10-16 Thread Andrew J. Korty
Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I tend to use my `org-agenda-custom-commands' in a strict order. I first check for a first view, then check for a second view, etc. Why not just display all those views, in order, with one custom command? For example, when I'm at home, I run C-c a h: (h

[Orgmode] Re: possible bug in version 5.08

2007-09-14 Thread Andrew J. Korty
| ad-do-it | (let ((annotation )) | ad-do-it ` -- Andrew J. Korty, Deputy Information Security Officer Office of the Vice President for Information Technology and CIO Indiana University ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember