Re: [O] Insert TODO Item at Bottom
Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: Hi Esben, Esben Stien wrote: I add a TODO item with M-S-RET, but is there any way to insert the new TODO item at the bottom of the current node or is there any way to navigate quickly to the last TODO item of the current node?. An ECM (Minimal Complete Example) could eventually help here, to be sure you describe your problem with no ambiguity. I often run C-c a s to search, but I end up at the top and I always have to scroll down to the last TODO item; this is wasting my life If I understood correctly, just doing C-c C-n (next visible node) could help? Or eventually C-c C-f followed by C-c C-p, if you have a problem because of mixed levels (that is, next node of the same level, then back to previous node, of whichever level). I believe he's saying he has something like this, with point at -!- or similar: , | * one -!- | ** TODO two | ** TODO three ` and ideally wants to insert a new TODO item such that he gets: , | * one | ** TODO two | ** TODO three | ** TODO four -!- ` -- Jeremiah Dodds blog : http://jdodds.github.com github : https://github.com/jdodds freenode : exhortatory twitter: kaens
Re: [O] showing orgmode source in orgmode
Alexandre Russel alexan...@russel.fr writes: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Charles Philip Chan cpc...@bell.net wrote: #+begin_example org #+begin_src java #+end_src #+end_src exports without color: #+begin_src java #+end_src #+begin_src org #+begin_src java #+end_src #+end_src exports with color but only: #+begin_src java Alex Shouldn't that be '#+begin_src org', not '#+begin_example org' ? -- Jeremiah Dodds blog : http://jdodds.github.com github : https://github.com/jdodds freenode : exhortatory twitter: kaens
Re: [O] Please consider making a donation
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Hello all, I've been a freelancer for the last two months and I want to continue this experience. As such, my main challenge is to discipline myself not to spend too much time on Org -- because, as you can imagine, it *is* very tempting. So the more donation I receive, the more time I will have for Org. Any donation will first go into a new computer, as my lovely Thinkpad X61 is about to die. I you think of any Emacs/Org development you would like to sponsor, independantly from what's already existing, please send me an email. Thanks for your help! You're on my shortlist of people to donate to when I have some spare cash. I'm eternally grateful for the work you've put into Org! If I had the ability, I'd just pay you to work on it straight-up. As an aside, Thinkpads are pretty notorious for living through hell. My T410 is currently ridiculously beat up, but still runs like a charm. -- Jeremiah Dodds blog : http://jdodds.github.com github : https://github.com/jdodds freenode : exhortatory twitter: kaens
Re: [O] on the go capture
Sample Hampton zaphod4...@aol.com writes: Users, What do you use to capture when away from orgmode (in the car, on the subway) and what system do you use to migrate those captures into orgmode? Right now I just use a notebook and a pen--and it works fairly well--but moving from notebook to org is certainly a pain, and I am sure I am losing information. What do you use? And if you use mobileorg, then how well does it work? Thanks, Sample When I had a smartphone, I used mobileorg and it worked beautifully.
Re: [O] C-c a t doesn't give yield list of all TODO items
Christopher W. Ryan cr...@binghamton.edu writes: But when I try to type C-c a I only get that far, and emacs tells me, C-c a is undefined There is a drop-down menu item under the Org item, called Agenda Command... which offers me lettered choices, and t will list all TODO entries. But what is the keyboard shortcut, if not C-a a t ? Thanks. You have to bind it yourself. Put (global-set-key \C-ca 'org-agenda) somewhere sensible. This *is* mentioned somewhere in the org docs, but I can't remember where off the top of my head.
[O] Git repo not cloneable?
I was looking to add scala support to org-babel, but the repo linked from http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html appears to need some server-side love: $ git --version git version 1.7.9.2 $ git clone http://orgmode.org/w/org-mode.git Cloning into 'org-mode'... fatal: http://orgmode.org/w/org-mode.git/info/refs not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server?
Re: [O] Git repo not cloneable?
suvayu ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes: Hi Jonathan and Jeremiah, On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 14:29, Jonathan Leech-Pepin jonathan.leechpe...@gmail.com wrote: Seems that the URL listed on that page is not correct for cloning. The URL is the correct one for web access. [...] So http cloning is enabled, the URL simply isn't mentioned (And I can't remember where I found it originally) I updated the page. Please take a look and feel free to edit/comment if its still unclear. :) Thanks for putting the correct url in, that cleared up all the issues I was having :D
Re: [O] Displaying or linking to definitions of terms?
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Hello, There are probably a lot of ways to achieve this with included tools. For example, on a per file basis, you may use radio targets: #+begin_src org Contempt for happiness is usually contempt for other people's happiness, and is an elegant hatred for the human race. * Definitions - elegant :: pleasingly graceful and stylish in appearance or manner; pleasingly ingenious and simple. #+end_src Note that you have to activate elegant radio target the first time you introduce it (with C-c C-c), but present and future radio targets will be liked to it automatically. Regards, Thanks, I had somehow totally forgot about the 'item' targets, they'll probably serve my purposes for the time being.
[O] Displaying or linking to definitions of terms?
I've done a fair amount of reading (and-rereading) the manual, and searching around, but my search skills are failing me and org-mode is flexible enough that I figure that someone has either done this, or there's something that makes it unnecessary that I don't know of. I'd like to be able to write a definition of a term, and then be able to jump to that definition, or see that definition in some way in buffers where the term occurs. Preferably on a file can specify a file with term definitions or a global scale, but even per-file period would be awesome. I imagine something like a block. In pseudo-org-code: #+begin_definition :term elegant pleasingly graceful and stylish in appearance or manner; pleasingly ingenious and simple. #+end_definition If there's a way for me to acheive the goal of find the definition for this term in a this is already idiomatic-org type of way, I'd love to hear it. If anyone has done something similar, I'd love to hear about it. If not, I'd love to implement it, and would be immensely grateful for any high-level pointers to entry-points for implementation, whether functions or code files or whatnot. Thanks for your time, and for all the collective effort put into this amazingly useful peice of software.
