Re: [O] * [[shell:cat ~/tmp | grep "asdf :: "]] does not work.

Dear Nicolas! On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:38:09PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Josef Atmin writes: > > >> when a shell command in an unnumbered list includes '::', it is not > >> recognized as a shell > >> command anymore. > &g

Re: [O] "No link found" for after <2016-02-21 Sun>

Dear Nicolas, that would be great. Thanks for letting me know. Josef. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:58:16AM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Josef Atmin writes: > > > So there remains my wishlist item, namely that typing after a > > link results in a newlin

Re: [O] "No link found" for after <2016-02-21 Sun>

Dear Nicolas! On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:34:21PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Josef Atmin writes: > > >> when the curser is at the end of the line directly after <2016-02-21 Sun>, > >> i.e. there > >> comes a newline right after the &

[O] "No link found" for after <2016-02-21 Sun>

Hi, the maintainer of the Debian org-mode package referred me to this list for my bug report. Best regards, Josef. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:29:03AM +0100, Josef Atmin wrote: > Package: org-mode > Version: 8.3.3-3 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > when the cu

Re: [O] * [[shell:cat ~/tmp | grep "asdf :: "]] does not work.

me output: > > > > * [[shell:cat ~/tmp | grep "asdf :"]] > > * [[shell:cat ~/tmp | grep "asdf ::"]] > > * [[shell:cat ~/tmp | grep "asdf :: "]] > > > > => > > > > Executing cat ~/tmp | grep "asdf :" > >

[O] * [[shell:cat ~/tmp | grep "asdf :: "]] does not work.

Hi, the maintainer of the Debian org-mode package referred me to this list for my bug report. Best regards, Josef. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:10:52AM +0100, Josef Atmin wrote: > Package: org-mode > Version: 8.3.3-3 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > when

Re: [O] TODOs with repeat are not sorted correctly(?) in the agenda view

Dear Bastien, Bastien altern.org> writes: > > I have tried to customize `org-agenda-sorting-strategy', but only > > 'user-defined-up' might do the trick, I think. > > However, I do not know LISP and > > would not know how to define the required comparison function. > > In fact we need a date-u

Re: [O] TODOs with repeat are not sorted correctly(?) in the agenda view

Bastien altern.org> writes: > Yes. First thing we need to know is whether he has been trying to > achieve what he wants by configuring `org-agenda-sorting-strategy'. > Maybe he's not aware of that option. Hello Bastien, I have posted the bug report. Thanks for responding so quickly. I have t