Thanks, I'll take a look.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017, 19:11 Michael Brand wrote:
> Hi Manuel
>
> Not sure if I understand your formulas right, so check my solutions with
> the formula debugger.
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Manuel Schneckenreither
> wrote:
>
&g
Hi,
I'd like to use following formula on like this:
| t | y_t | y_{t+1} |
|---+-+-|
| 1 | 115 | |
| 2 | 121 | |
| 3 | 118 | |
| 4 | 127 | |
$4 = \sum_{\tau=0}^{@#-2}{0.9^{\tau} * y_{@#-2-\tau}}
So that's a simple sum, which just itera
Hi,
I'd like to use following formula on like this:
| t | y_t | y_{t+1} |
|---+-+-|
| 1 | 115 | |
| 2 | 121 | |
| 3 | 118 | |
| 4 | 127 | |
$4 = \sum_{\tau=0}^{@#-2}{0.9^{\tau} * y_{@#-2-\tau}}
So that's a simple sum, which just itera
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
--
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
--
Sorry for the late response from me.
I read all your ideas on how to solve that.
For now I made them to use the org-mode syntax. We'll see if that works
out tho.
To your suggestions:
@Jorge: I also had the idea of an emacs configuration which restricts to
org mode only. The good thing is that t
Hi fellows,
I couldn't find anything on the web about it. Therefore, I like to ask
you if anyone knows a program (another editor) which supports Org mode.
The idea behind this is, that I like to do collaboration with several
other persons, which don't use emacs nor vim (they are "normal" Windows
