Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters

2014-02-10 Thread Steffan Iverson
Thanks Eric - I've used this patch but I doesn't seem to solve the problem.
I'm working on an earlier suggestion by Michael about the unicode type that
my Tibetan font is. I very much appreciate all this help!

Steffan


On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.netwrote:

 Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:

  Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
 
  I've been using that patch or something like it for nearly a year now,
  with no adverse effects. I'm on the road right now, give me a day and
  I'll take a closer look at what I've got...
 
  Great -- thanks in advance!  I'll then wait before releasing a new
  minor version and merging it into Emacs for Emacs 24.4.
 
  To other core maintainers: if you see important issues that needs to
  be fixed in maint, let me know.

 Sorry this took a while to get to...

 I think it was a little simpler than I thought -- at least I hope that's
 true, and I'm not missing something really obvious. There are two
 patches attached, a simple one that handles re-justification of table
 fields during field movement, and another that allows for narrowing of
 columns with double-width strings. The second patch is uglier, and
 doesn't work 100% well (you get misalignment if you try to narrow a
 double-wide to an odd number of single-width characters), but it's
 better than nothing.

 Please test!

 Eric




Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters

2014-02-04 Thread Steffan Iverson
Michael, that test case you suggest does indeed cause the same spacing
problem. So this isn't a problem from the vowel stacking in Tibetan,
because of the type of font it is? Sorry, generally new to Emacs so I'm not
sure how to move forward with that insight.


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Michael Brand
michael.ch.br...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Steffan

 On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Steffan Iverson
 steffan.iver...@gmail.com wrote:
  Screenshot: http://oi59.tinypic.com/lz893.jpg

 Judging from e. g. this part
 | རྐུས་  | rkus |
 | གསོས་ | gsos |
 in your screenshot my speculation is that you get glyphs from not only your
 default monospace font but also from other (maybe variable width) font(s).
 Either because some glyphs are not available in your default monospace font
 or are not used due to an incomplete configuration with set-fontset-font.

 For a diagnosis in this direction I would check the alignment of | after
 some characters just repeated like here:

 xx|
 ་་|
 གག|
 རར|
 སས|
 ུུ|
 ོོ|
 ྐྐ|
 xx|
 ∞∞|

 Michael



[O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters

2014-02-02 Thread Steffan Iverson
Hello all,


I've made an org table that includes both English and Tibetan characters,
and the columns don't line up. I suspect this is because of the way Tibetan
characters are displayed - they stack below and above each other, making
the characters vertically taller than the English characters. You can see
this
same problem in the text pasted below, it behaves the same way in an org
table. Any way to solve this problem? Perhaps somehow changing the height
of all the text in the table? Thanks!

| རྐུ་བ་| rku-ba | བརྐུས་པ་  | brkus-pa| བརྐུ་བ་   | brku-ba
| རྐུས་   | rkus|
| གསོ་བ་   | gso-ba | གསོས་པ་  | gsos-pa | གསོ་བ་   | gso-ba |
གསོས་  | gsos|
| འཆོར་བ་  | 'chor-ba   | ཤོར་བ་   | shor-ba | འཆོར་བ་  | 'chor-ba   |


Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters

2014-02-02 Thread Steffan Iverson
Screenshot: http://oi59.tinypic.com/lz893.jpg


On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Steffan Iverson
steffan.iver...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello all,


 I've made an org table that includes both English and Tibetan characters,
 and the columns don't line up. I suspect this is because of the way
 Tibetan
 characters are displayed - they stack below and above each other, making
 the characters vertically taller than the English characters. You can see
 this
 same problem in the text pasted below, it behaves the same way in an org
 table. Any way to solve this problem? Perhaps somehow changing the height
 of all the text in the table? Thanks!

 | རྐུ་བ་| rku-ba | བརྐུས་པ་  | brkus-pa| བརྐུ་བ་   |
 brku-ba| རྐུས་   | rkus|
 | གསོ་བ་   | gso-ba | གསོས་པ་  | gsos-pa | གསོ་བ་   | gso-ba |
 གསོས་  | gsos|
 | འཆོར་བ་  | 'chor-ba   | ཤོར་བ་   | shor-ba | འཆོར་བ་  | 'chor-ba   |