Hello, First, please check below simple example, I defined two tables (T1 and T2). In table-2, I remotely refer to the @>$1 (last row, column 1) and $LR2 (last row, column 2) of T1.
#+TBLNAME: T1 | 11 | 12 | | 21 | 22 | | 31 | 32 | #+TBLNAME: T2 | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | | # | 21 | 32 | | #+TBLFM: @>$3=remote(T1,$LR2)::@>$2=remote(T1,@>$1) Obviously, the expected results are: - remote(T1,@>$1) is replaced by 31 - remote(T1,$LR2) is replaced by 32 But I got 21 for remote(T1,@>$1). The $LR version works perfectly (though the manual says $LR is out-dated) Below are debug info when evaluating remote(T1,@>$1). Looks like @> in the remote reference is mapped to the last row of the current table, not of the remote table. Substitution history of formula Orig: remote(T1,@2$1) $xyz-> remote(T1,@2$1) @r$c-> (21) $1-> (21) Result: 21 Format: NONE Final: 21 Emacs : GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.6) of 2011-09-13 on shirley Package: Org-mode version 7.7