> Bruce D'Arcus hat am 18. April 2020 15:22 geschrieben:
>
>
> But ...
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:17 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I can't see that it's necessary to have a fourth, because I think the
> > result of that would be this, which doesn't make any sense.
> >
> > 4. "Do
Sorry, my last message was unreadable. (and possibly sent twice, once from a
wrong account... don't know if this will come through)
> Stefan Nobis hat am 13. April 2020 10:33 geschrieben:
>
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
> > Alphanumeric suffix provides 62 combinations, which should hopeful
> > Stefan Nobis hat am 13. April 2020 10:33 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> >
> > > Alphanumeric suffix provides 62 combinations, which should hopefully
> > > be enough for any citation back-end out there (I'm looking at you
> > > biblatex). It's not terribly readable, tho
> Nicolas Goaziou hat am 13. April 2020 00:19
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> denis.maier.li...@mailbox.org writes:
>
> > Just one question concerning typed citations. citeX is good and
> > concise, but why limit this to only one character?
>
> Because… it is good and concise? ;)
>
> > Wha
Nicolas Goaziou hat am 12. April 2020 17:32
geschrieben:
>
>
> "Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nicolas Goaziou
> > wrote:
>
> >> Yes, and a "t-styled" citation would be:
> >>
> >> [citet:see;@doe2020;@doe2019]
> >>
> >> Barring the prefix, the syntax of th
Hi,
> Let's assume Org implements SuppressAuthor as "-@doe", so far it has:
>
> | Syntax| Mode| Sample output
> |
> |---+-+---|
> | @doe or [cite:@doe] | AuthorInText
Hi,
very good to see these things are getting discussed again. (Back then, I have
been following the citation syntax discussion from a distance rather then
participating actively, so that's my first post here.)
It would be great if Org had a closer integration with a Citeproc. This would
be a
