Re: [O] [PATCH] Timestamps: Fix org-schedule and org-deadline with absolute time arguments

2011-12-11 Thread Bastien
pmli...@free.fr (Peter Münster) writes:

 * lisp/org.el (org-add-planning-info): Treat absolute time too.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
 Bastien



[O] [PATCH] Timestamps: Fix org-schedule and org-deadline with absolute time arguments

2011-11-21 Thread Peter Münster
* lisp/org.el (org-add-planning-info): Treat absolute time too.

TINYCHANGE
---
 lisp/org.el |7 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
index fffb0c1..3342b87 100644
--- a/lisp/org.el
+++ b/lisp/org.el
@@ -12078,9 +12078,8 @@ be removed.
  default-input (and ts (org-get-compact-tod ts))
   (when what
(setq time
- (if (and (stringp time)
-  (string-match ^[-+]+[0-9] time))
- ;; This is a relative time, set the proper date
+ (if (stringp time)
+ ;; This is a string (relative or absolute), set proper date
  (apply 'encode-time
 (org-read-date-analyze
  time default-time (decode-time default-time)))
@@ -14807,7 +14806,7 @@ The prompt will suggest to enter an ISO date, but you 
can also enter anything
 which will at least partially be understood by `parse-time-string'.
 Unrecognized parts of the date will default to the current day, month, year,
 hour and minute.  If this command is called to replace a timestamp at point,
-of to enter the second timestamp of a range, the default time is taken
+or to enter the second timestamp of a range, the default time is taken
 from the existing stamp.  Furthermore, the command prefers the future,
 so if you are giving a date where the year is not given, and the day-month
 combination is already past in the current year, it will assume you
-- 
1.7.3.4