Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-04-16 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bastien b...@altern.org writes: I know, but the users should not have to guess this. Maybe a note about the allowed structure here in the manual would be useful. Done in e84c1d8442b857f9275e86bb34f12811f49fcdd6. Perfect, thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-04-12 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: I know, but the users should not have to guess this. Maybe a note about the allowed structure here in the manual would be useful. Done in e84c1d8442b857f9275e86bb34f12811f49fcdd6. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-04-11 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Thus, this patch - properly fontifies headlines with both a regular keyword and a COMMENT keyword, - fixes `org-toggle-comment' and `org-todo' to handle both COMMENT keyword and

Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-04-11 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Speaking of consistency, I noticed this minor glitch: * NEXT COMMENT A headline [0/2] - [ ] A - [ ] B * NEXT [#A] [1/2] COMMENT Another headline - [X] A - [ ] B See that the second COMMENT is not fontified and I think it will not be processed correctly.

Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-04-11 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: So the COMMENT keyword in the second headline is not valid. I know, but the users should not have to guess this. Maybe a note about the allowed structure here in the manual would be useful. -- Bastien

Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-04-10 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Thus, this patch - properly fontifies headlines with both a regular keyword and a COMMENT keyword, - fixes `org-toggle-comment' and `org-todo' to handle both COMMENT keyword and another one - adds some consistency to functions

[O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-03-24 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, COMMENT keyword is not always clearly defined in Org. Some parts consider it is a regular keyword as treat it as such (e.g. `org-todo') whereas some others see it as an additional keyword (e.g., `org-priority'). I think the latter makes more sense, and, as a consequence, Org Syntax

Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-03-24 Thread Samuel Wales
does this preserve todo keyword font locking and sorting? it is an interesting change if so, and i would probably find it useful. does archive work the same way? i presume it is a coincidence that this message comes after mine which mentioned font locking and sorting, as the fix to that message

Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword

2014-03-24 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes: does this preserve todo keyword font locking This is one goal of the patch. and sorting? IIRC, TODO-based sorting refers to `org-todo-keywords-1', which doesn't include COMMENT, so I don't think this changes sorting (i.e., sorting ignores