Bastien writes:
> | Key | Command | Proposal | Status |
> |---+---+--+|
> | C-c # | Checkboxes| C-c x| Free |
> | C-c ~ | Cooperation | C-c
Hi Sébastien,
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
> Weird. I don't even see the binding in `find-func.el' (in Emacs trunk
> from last week):
My bad -- this is a custom keybinding of mine, I added it long ago and
rediscovered it recently. It definitely deserve a keybinding of its
own IMO.
--
Bastie
Bastien writes:
> So C-c : would call org-edit-src-code and C-c C-: would convert the
> region to fixed-width region.
You cannot enter C-: in some terminals because it would require
simultaneous processing of shift and control (these terminals ignore
shift while control is pressed).
Regards,
Ach
Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" writes:
>> Bastien wrote:
>>> (This one I knew. My own recent discovery was C-h : to directly jump
>>> to the definition of a symbol. Pretty useful.)
>>
>> ╭
>> │ C-h : is undefined
>> ╰
>>
>> on my side. To what is it bound on your side
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
> Bastien wrote:
>> (This one I knew. My own recent discovery was C-h : to directly jump
>> to the definition of a symbol. Pretty useful.)
>
> ╭
> │ C-h : is undefined
> ╰
>
> on my side. To what is it bound on your side?
find-function
C-h : runs the
Hello Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> (This one I knew. My own recent discovery was C-h : to directly jump
> to the definition of a symbol. Pretty useful.)
╭
│ C-h : is undefined
╰
on my side. To what is it bound on your side?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos writes:
> ,
> |* Don't bind `C-h' following any prefix character (including `C-c').
> | If you don't bind `C-h', it is automatically available as a help
> | character for listing the subcommands of the prefix character.
> `
>
> That's *very* useful to me
Hi Thomas,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> A few comments on the last three:
>>
>> - " is not a punctuation character, I find C-c " instead of C-c ' good.
>
> Is it true that " is not a punctuation character?
It is a string in both fundamental-mode and org-mode, th
Bastien writes:
> A few comments on the last three:
>
> - " is not a punctuation character, I find C-c " instead of C-c ' good.
Is it true that " is not a punctuation character?
In any event, C-c " is likely to pose the same problem as C-c '. For
icicle users, C-c " will be shadowed by the ke
"Tim O'Callaghan" writes:
>>
>> Rasmus writes:
>>
>>> For me the following keys need shift or Alt-Gr: ^, ", `, !, ?, and
>>> ~.
>>
>> Oh, do you really need the Alt-Gr key for `?' and `!' ?
>>
>> Does that mean you don't use `C-c !' or that you rarely use it?
>>
>> Of course, this may have nothi
>
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> For me the following keys need shift or Alt-Gr: ^, ", `, !, ?, and
>> ~.
>
> Oh, do you really need the Alt-Gr key for `?' and `!' ?
>
> Does that mean you don't use `C-c !' or that you rarely use it?
>
> Of course, this may have nothing to do with the keybinding itself,
>
Bastien writes:
> What I don't understand is why keeping the right control key between
> C-c and C-' is harder than releasing the control key between C-c and
> ' (or " as also proposed.) My experience (which seems the same than
> Nick's) is that holding the control key down is easier/faster.
That
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales writes:
> i meant that c-c c-' and c-c c-" are both cumbersome for those users
> who press c-c by holding down the control key with the right hand and
> then pressing c with the left hand. c-c ' is not cumbersome for those
> users.
I understand better now, thanks.
What
hi bastien,
i meant that c-c c-' and c-c c-" are both cumbersome for those users
who press c-c by holding down the control key with the right hand and
then pressing c with the left hand. c-c ' is not cumbersome for those
users.
samuel
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
Samuel Wales writes:
> c-c c-' is just as bad. control is a modifier key. try it!
I tried it and for me it is better than C-c '
Anyway, let's try to find the best replacement.
--
Bastien
well, almost as bad :). you have to press shift also, but that's a
minor difference :).
On 2/8/14, Bastien wrote:
> I understand. I don't think any of the proposed rebindings requires
> this -- except C-c " -- but C-c C-' is better anyway.
hi bastien,
c-c c-' is just as bad. control is a modifier key. try it!
samuel
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand writes:
> With these two reasons my suggestion is to just drop the binding for
> (org-update-statistics-cookies).
Agreed. If noone objects, I'll remove C-c #.
--
Bastien
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales writes:
> any sequence where one step is on one side and another step is on the
> other side is fine unless they are both shifted.
I understand. I don't think any of the proposed rebindings requires
this -- except C-c " -- but C-c C-' is better anyway.
--
Bastien
Rasmus writes:
> For me the following keys need shift or Alt-Gr: ^, ", `, !, ?, and
> ~.
Oh, do you really need the Alt-Gr key for `?' and `!' ?
Does that mean you don't use `C-c !' or that you rarely use it?
Of course, this may have nothing to do with the keybinding itself,
but I'm curious.
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos writes:
> On a QWERTY keyboard or Dvorak keyboard, " requires Shifting, so you
> have to switch horses midstream (first Control, then SHift). Not sure
> about anybody else, but those are the most problematic key sequences for
> me. I would much prefer C-c C-': you just keep t
i'd like to point out that some of these bindings are problematic on
qwerty in a way that is not obvious to many users.
many people use shifting keys on both sides of the keyboard.
they do not issue the control of control g using left hand. that is a
bad idea. instead, they hold down the right
Nick Dokos writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> The purpose is to be polite with minor modes and to not use
>> C-c [:punct:] keybindings, as recommended in the Elisp manual.
>>
>> This is related to the issues reported here:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-01/msg00866.html
>> h
Bastien writes:
> The purpose is to be polite with minor modes and to not use
> C-c [:punct:] keybindings, as recommended in the Elisp manual.
>
> This is related to the issues reported here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-01/msg00866.html
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.
Hi Bastien
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Bastien wrote:
> | C-c # | Checkboxes| C-c x| Free |
I did not know "C-c #" (org-update-statistics-cookies) because for me
it is easier to remember and therefore I always used this: Go to
cookie and do "C-c C-c". A
Thanks for your feedback.
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
>> - use C-c < for selecting the whole subtree, which is consistent
>> with the use of `<' as a speedy command for doing the same.
>
> You put the finger on one important note to me: that speed commands are
> "the same" as their longer
Bastien wrote:
> The purpose is to be polite with minor modes and to not use
> C-c [:punct:] keybindings, as recommended in the Elisp manual.
>
> This is related to the issues reported here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-01/msg00866.html
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ema
The purpose is to be polite with minor modes and to not use
C-c [:punct:] keybindings, as recommended in the Elisp manual.
This is related to the issues reported here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-01/msg00866.html
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/82010
Here is
28 matches
Mail list logo
