Hello,
Simon Thum writes:
> Same here (yes please!), for the same reason ;)
>
> On 12/19/2015 04:27 PM, Thierry Banel wrote:
>> I vote "yes".
>> It was annoying to see bracketed numbers as links to nowhere.
>>
>> The Nobel prize for the detection of the neutrino _[1995]_ was
>>FrederickReine
Same here (yes please!), for the same reason ;)
On 12/19/2015 04:27 PM, Thierry Banel wrote:
I vote "yes".
It was annoying to see bracketed numbers as links to nowhere.
The Nobel prize for the detection of the neutrino _[1995]_ was
FrederickReines and the prizes for the discovery of neutrino
I vote "yes".
It was annoying to see bracketed numbers as links to
nowhere.
The Nobel prize for the detection of the
neutrino [1995] was
Frederick Reines and the prizes for the discovery of
neutrino
oscillations [2015]
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> Can I now write:
>>
>> X[fn:1]
>>
>> [1] foot
>
> Uh? No.
> [...]
Very good! Thanks for clarifying.
Rasmus
--
A page of history is worth a volume of logic
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
> Can I now write:
>
> X[fn:1]
>
> [1] foot
Uh? No.
> If so, why the need for the fanciness? Why not just require label and
> reference to be the same? I doesn’t sound like something that would be
> nice to have to explain to an Org newcomer.
I just mean that,
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> As discussed previously, I pushed changes about footnotes in a dedicated
> branch, "wip-no-plain-fn", for testing.
>
> In a nutshell, in this branch, Org no longer recognizes [1]-like
> constructs as valid footnotes, an no longer spend time matching them.
Thanks a
Hello,
As discussed previously, I pushed changes about footnotes in a dedicated
branch, "wip-no-plain-fn", for testing.
In a nutshell, in this branch, Org no longer recognizes [1]-like
constructs as valid footnotes, an no longer spend time matching them.
As a consequence, "fn:" can now be unambi