Re: [O] IMPORTANT: please update your email filters
Hi Matt, Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes: FWIW, I find the [O] label a little bit too short and cryptic for effective visual scanning. It is very similar, for instance to [OT], a commonly used subject label. I first thought it might stand for Open, until I found all the other posts bearing the label. I imagine it could also be confused with [0]. I somehow hope the problem with Gmane comes from the fact that it doesn't allow single-character labels -- that way I would have a good reason to switch from [O] to [Org] (which I finally find better as well) without looking to stupid. Let's wait Lars' answer and see what we do. Thanks, -- Bastien -- Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [O] IMPORTANT: please update your email filters
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Artificially adding the [Orgmode] label to make sure nobody misses this announcement. FWIW, this new label seems to have confused Gmane: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode Best, Matt -- Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [O] IMPORTANT: please update your email filters
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes: Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Artificially adding the [Orgmode] label to make sure nobody misses this announcement. FWIW, this new label seems to have confused Gmane: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode I should clarify. The old [Orgmode] label was automatically removed from the subject line of archived mail on Gmane. The new [O] label is not. This adds a fair bit of clutter and noise to the archived conversations. Does anyone know whether something needs to be changed on Gmane's end? FWIW, I find the [O] label a little bit too short and cryptic for effective visual scanning. It is very similar, for instance to [OT], a commonly used subject label. I first thought it might stand for Open, until I found all the other posts bearing the label. I imagine it could also be confused with [0]. Thanks, Matt -- Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[O] IMPORTANT: please update your email filters
Dear all, I've replaced the tag [Orgmode] with [O] for this mailing list. If you are filtering the list by matching [Orgmode] in the subject line, please update your MUA filters. Thanks, -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [O] IMPORTANT: please update your email filters
Hi Bastien, should this announcement not using the old tag? Just to avoid that the mail get lost due to still old filter rules? Just an idea from good old amateur radio days. You have to announce the change of frequency on the old frequency ;) Torsten On Feb 28, 2011 7:57 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Dear all, I've replaced the tag [Orgmode] with [O] for this mailing list. If you are filtering the list by matching [Orgmode] in the subject line, please update your MUA filters. Thanks, -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[O] IMPORTANT: please update your email filters
Dear all, I've replaced the tag [Orgmode] with [O] for this mailing list. If you are filtering the list by matching [Orgmode] in the subject line, please update your MUA filters. Thanks, -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
