Hi,
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
In fact, I'm always of the opinion, if the change is minor, or corrects
a mistake, or simplifies things, just go ahead with it.
My thoughts exactly -- Rasmus, please go ahead by apply your change
and Suvayu will complete it when he has time.
Hi Rasmus, Bastien,
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Rasmus wrote:
I have attached a quick patch with a text that I think is more
accurate and that tries to explain the issue. I think the tone may be
too academic/dry.
Since Suvayu put the initial effort into the answer I will
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
The intention is nice, but this entry is flawed to the point that it
should be removed or undergo some heavy editing IMO. . .
Yes, the sa-ignore-headline function should be updated.
Can you give it a go?
In two weeks.
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
The only tricky part is to remove the heading from the table
of contents, but this is optional and the limitation can be advertized
as such.
Come on, that's not really acceptable for an advice on org-mode.org.
It is better than the current situation.
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
The only tricky part is to remove the heading from the table
of contents, but this is optional and the limitation can be advertized
as such.
Come on, that's not really acceptable for an advice on org-mode.org.
It is
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
BTW, the ignoreheading thing has been asked so many times, maybe I
should put it in an FAQ. But then, the content is more
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
The intention is nice, but this entry is flawed to the point that it
should be removed or undergo some heavy editing IMO. . .
Yes, the sa-ignore-headline function should be updated.
Can you give it a go?
I don't see why this should not be easy: you
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
BTW, the ignoreheading thing has been asked so many times, maybe I
should put it in an FAQ. But then, the content is more appropriate for
org-hacks ... I'm undecided. Any
Hi Suvayu,
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
BTW, the ignoreheading thing has been asked so many times, maybe I
should put it in an FAQ. But then, the content is more appropriate for
org-hacks ... I'm undecided. Any thoughts?
It's both a FAQ and a hack, perhaps put the answer
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:56:35AM +, James Harkins wrote:
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+linux at gmail.com writes:
A couple of comments about formatting: the
first two footnotes might be better as links from the text. I propose
the attached patch. If you think this is fine, I'll push it.
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+linux at gmail.com writes:
A couple of comments about formatting: the
first two footnotes might be better as links from the text. I propose
the attached patch. If you think this is fine, I'll push it.
Sure, go ahead.
hjh
Hi James,
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:57:11AM +0800, James Harkins wrote:
http://orgmode.org/worg/exporters/beamer/beamer-dual-format.html
It is a great resource. A couple of comments about formatting: the
first two footnotes might be better as links from the text. I propose
the attached
Hi all,
Some weeks ago, I wrote here about a large project (training materials for
the SuperCollider audio/music programming language), written entirely in
org using the Beamer exporter to produce both slideshows and an
article-format book for the students to use as a reference.
I just put
13 matches
Mail list logo
