Re: [O] Some projects

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Matt Lundin wrote: > Matt Price writes: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Rasmus wrote: > > > > > > Aaron Ecay writes: > > > > Indeed. I guess this is what they use: > > >

Re: [O] Some projects

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Matt Price wrote: > > That does seem to be an issue, but I bet it wouldn't be too hard to fix. > Currently outputformat is hardcoded on line 94 of lib/citeServer.js; I'm a > little slow at reading JS but I think replacing line 259 with a

Re: [O] Some projects

Matt Lundin writes: > Perhaps someone with more experience of pandoc could assess how well it > toggles between CSL and biblatex, especially for more complicated styles > (e.g., Chicago). Can you point out an example of the expected format? Bibtex.el does pretty well and

Re: [O] Some projects

Rasmus writes: > Matt Lundin writes: > >> Perhaps someone with more experience of pandoc could assess how well it >> toggles between CSL and biblatex, especially for more complicated styles >> (e.g., Chicago). > > Can you point out an example of the expected

Re: [O] Some projects

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I've tried more than once over the past couple of years to attack > orgstruct mode, and been defeated every time. Largely because > indentation/filling is so damn complicated (too many layers of > indirection for my little brain), and orgstruct

Re: [O] Some projects

Rasmus writes: > Aaron Ecay writes: > >> Hi Richard, hi all, >> >> 2015ko urriak 26an, Richard Lawrence-ek idatzi zuen: >>> >> >> [...] >> I was working on this rather intensively at one time, but I had to stop because other aspects of life

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi Rasmus, 2015ko urriak 27an, Rasmus-ek idatzi zuen: [...] > > Can someone remind me why citeproc-java isn’t good? AFAIR, it has a > bibtex parser. But probably it lacks in some other dimension... You have to write java to use it, which is a big negative (at least for me). Last time I

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi Rasmus and all, Rasmus writes: > I would feel more comfortable relying on a JS library. Perhaps it’s also > easier to find people who are willing to work on/knows JS over the long > haul... Yes, I agree with both you and Aaron here. JS is easier to distribute and probably

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi Richard, hi all, 2015ko urriak 26an, Richard Lawrence-ek idatzi zuen: > [...] >> I was working on this rather intensively at one time, but I had to stop >> because other aspects of life intruded. I have just been coming back >> towards a situation where I can imagine myself having some

Re: [O] Some projects

Aaron Ecay writes: > Hi Richard, hi all, > > 2015ko urriak 26an, Richard Lawrence-ek idatzi zuen: >> > > [...] > >>> I was working on this rather intensively at one time, but I had to stop >>> because other aspects of life intruded. I have just been coming back >>> towards

Re: [O] Some projects

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Rasmus wrote: > Hi, > > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> I don't know which OS you are using, but just checking on >> [[https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/1.15.1]] and >> [[https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/tag/1.15.1.1]]: >> >>

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi, Ista Zahn writes: > I disagree. pandoc supports conversion to and from org-mode. I fail to see how this is relevant for the discussion at hand. > Making pandoc a requirement will enable other useful features (e.g., > "Import documents from...", alternative pandoc-based

Re: [O] Some projects

On Oct 27, 2015 11:09 AM, "Rasmus Pank Roulund" wrote: > > Hi, > > Ista Zahn writes: > > > I disagree. pandoc supports conversion to and from org-mode. > > I fail to see how this is relevant for the discussion at hand. > > > Making pandoc a requirement will

Re: [O] Some projects

Rasmus Pank Roulund writes: > Hi, > > Ista Zahn writes: > >> I disagree. pandoc supports conversion to and from org-mode. > > I fail to see how this is relevant for the discussion at hand. This is not really relevant for citations discussion itself, but

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-27, at 19:53, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > I can adapt the code from org-annotate. The unfortunate thing about > tabulated list mode, which I otherwise really like, isn't able to show > multi-line list items. That really crimps its usefulness in showing >

Re: [O] Some projects

Rasmus writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Right, I'd forgotten the distinction. I really only use orgstruct for >> plain/numbered list editing (and I guess the occasional table), and >> filling/indentation is pretty key there. > > AFAIK, this doesn't

Re: [O] Some projects

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Right, I'd forgotten the distinction. I really only use orgstruct for > plain/numbered list editing (and I guess the occasional table), and > filling/indentation is pretty key there. AFAIK, this doesn't work in commented lines (e.g., when using

Re: [O] Some projects

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I've tried more than once over the past couple of years to attack >> orgstruct mode, and been defeated every time. Largely because >> indentation/filling is so damn complicated (too many

Re: [O] Some projects

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> >>> I've tried more than once over the past couple of years to attack >>> orgstruct mode, and been defeated every time. Largely because

Re: [O] Some projects

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Aaron Ecay wrote: > Hi Rasmus, > > 2015ko urriak 27an, Rasmus-ek idatzi zuen: > > [...] > > > > > It’s unfortunate, but pandoc has the most easily adaptable CSL > implementation for our use case, as far as I can see. The other > contender is

Re: [O] Some projects

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Rasmus wrote: > Aaron Ecay writes: > > > > > > It’s unfortunate, but pandoc has the most easily adaptable CSL > > implementation for our use case, as far as I can see. The other > > contender is Zotero (in JS, possibly with

Re: [O] Some projects

Aaron Ecay writes: > > - There is a difference between citations as done by latex/bibtex/etc., > and those done in every other format (handled through CSL). Assuming > latex users want to keep their native processing rather than > delegating to CSL, we need to solve

Re: [O] Some projects

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:05 PM Matt Price wrote: > > >> > FWIW, I just tried installing this on my Arch system, but it doesn't work > with node 0.12, and I am currently unable to switch to io.js due to > dependencies of several other projects. I guess tools like NVM can help

Re: [O] Some projects

Rasmus Pank Roulund writes: > > Ista Zahn writes: > >> IMO pandoc is easy on Windows and OSX. It is easy on some Linux distros >> but not all. > >> I use Arch LInux, where getting pandoc requires some work, but I think >> that is an issue that the Linux

Re: [O] Some projects

Matt Price writes: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Rasmus wrote: > > > Aaron Ecay writes: > > Indeed. I guess this is what they use: > > https://github.com/zotero/citeproc-node > > It also looks rather complex... > > >

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi, Rainer M Krug writes: > I don't know which OS you are using, but just checking on > [[https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/1.15.1]] and > [[https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/tag/1.15.1.1]]: > > Windows: 19.7 MB > Mac: 27.9 MB > Deb: 20.2 MB > > The 1600MB

Re: [O] Some projects

Aaron Ecay writes: > You have to write java to use it, which is a big negative (at least for > me). Last time I think we concluded that the CLI interface it exposes > is not adequate (though I actually started off trying to use it). I see. That's probably the reason. >

Re: [O] Some projects

Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2015-10-26, at 00:03, Aaron Ecay wrote: > >> - The only “off the shelf”-capable citation processing library that we >> found last time is in Haskell, which introduced some difficulties for >> distributing the resulting tool.

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-26, at 00:03, Aaron Ecay wrote: > - The only “off the shelf”-capable citation processing library that we > found last time is in Haskell, which introduced some difficulties for > distributing the resulting tool. I know some projects > (e.g. git-annex) are

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi Nicolas and all, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Richard Lawrence writes: > >> Yes, this is my understanding, too. In particular, there does not seem >> to be an Elisp CSL library, and it would be a lot of work to write >> one. > > Here is a

Re: [O] Some projects

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Richard Lawrence < richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > Hi Nicolas and all, > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > > Richard Lawrence writes: > > > >> Yes, this is my understanding, too. In particular, there

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi all, Aaron Ecay writes: > Hi Nicolas, > > Thanks for writing this up. It is important to think about, and > ultimately solve, all the issues you raise. Yes, thanks for this, Nicolas! > 2015ko urriak 25an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: >> >> ** Citations >> >>

Re: [O] Some projects

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > I'd like to see some features moving forward, and some important issues > fixed, hopefully, in the next months. I'm sharing them here so that > anyone interested can help. > [...] > * Important fixes > > ** Cache > > The cache needs

Re: [O] Some projects

Richard Lawrence writes: > Yes, this is my understanding, too. In particular, there does not seem > to be an Elisp CSL library, and it would be a lot of work to write > one. Here is a genuine question: what is the difficult part, or if there is none, the longer

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi Nicolas, Thanks for putting up this list. > ** Backslash escaping > Allowing to escape some symbols in plain text (e.g., emphasis markers, > square brackets...) would remove a limitation in verbatim/code objects. > As a small benefit, it would also permit to implement mid-word markup: >

[O] Some projects

Hello, I'd like to see some features moving forward, and some important issues fixed, hopefully, in the next months. I'm sharing them here so that anyone interested can help. * Features ** Citations Development apparently stopped for some reason. We have a citation syntax for Org in wip-cite

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi Nicolas, Thanks for writing this up. It is important to think about, and ultimately solve, all the issues you raise. 2015ko urriak 25an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: > > Hello, > > I'd like to see some features moving forward, and some important issues > fixed, hopefully, in the next

Re: [O] Some projects

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Rasmus wrote: > Hi, > > First, thanks for writing this up, Nicolas. Org has been a bit slow > lately, at least for my part. > ditto. and thanks to eveyrone in the thread for their input. > > > > > ** Citations > > > > Development apparently

Re: [O] Some projects

Anders Johansson gmail.com> writes: > I hacked together something like this a while ago when I needed to add > inline-comments that would later be exported as odt-comments (but I also > made it work for latex). > > I chose to implement it via a unicode-bracket ❰❙❱, like this: > > ❰Simple

Re: [O] Some projects

Marcin Borkowski writes: > That sounds interesting, though I don't really see much difference > between this and plain simple comments. 1. you cannot simply inline comments (you need to create a new link type or some such); 2. you cannot mark exactly where the comment

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-25, at 17:37, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> Since your point is quite valid - and OTOH, I would like to put anything >> (or almost anything) in =code= markup, for instance (my use case: Emacs >> keybindings, try =C-x

Re: [O] Some projects

2015-10-25 18:57 GMT+01:00 Thomas S. Dye : > would suggest an alternate wording. In this case, it would be super > helpful to have a function that replaced annotated text with the > annotation, so the author could easily accept the editor's suggestion. > > In this case, it would

Re: [O] Some projects

Fabrice Popineau writes: > 2015-10-25 18:57 GMT+01:00 Thomas S. Dye : > > >> would suggest an alternate wording. In this case, it would be super >> helpful to have a function that replaced annotated text with the >> annotation, so the author could

Re: [O] Some projects

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > I'd like to see some features moving forward, and some important issues > fixed, hopefully, in the next months. I'm sharing them here so that > anyone interested can help. > > ** Annotations > > It would be nice to allow annotating

Re: [O] Some projects

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Thomas S. Dye writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> The full proposal was at >>> but it didn't get >>> much positive feedback. Therefore I

Re: [O] Some projects

i like some of these ideas, particularly lexical. org already has a lot of syntax. i am leery of introducing yet more heterogenous syntax to org. key word heterogenous. i don't mind more features if it is always using the same syntax framework and thus can take advantage of everything else

Re: [O] Some projects

naturally, long-form emphasis can look like $[emphasis ...].

Re: [O] Some projects

Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: > > > On 2015-10-25, at 19:12, Nicolas Goaziou nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > > > Fabrice Popineau supelec.fr> writes: > > > >> 2015-10-25 18:57 GMT+01:00 Thomas S. Dye tsdye.com>: > >> > >> > >>> would suggest an alternate wording. In this case, it would

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-25, at 14:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to see some features moving forward, and some important issues > fixed, hopefully, in the next months. I'm sharing them here so that > anyone interested can help. > > > * Features > > ** Citations > >

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-25, at 16:45, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Sunday, 25 Oct 2015 at 14:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to see some features moving forward, and some important issues >> fixed, hopefully, in the next months. I'm sharing them here so that >> anyone

Re: [O] Some projects

Marcin Borkowski writes: > Since your point is quite valid - and OTOH, I would like to put anything > (or almost anything) in =code= markup, for instance (my use case: Emacs > keybindings, try =C-x ,= - Org won't recognize it as code!). I could > mess up with

Re: [O] Some projects

On Sunday, 25 Oct 2015 at 14:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to see some features moving forward, and some important issues > fixed, hopefully, in the next months. I'm sharing them here so that > anyone interested can help. Nicolas, I look forward to all the advances you have

Re: [O] Some projects

Eric S Fraga writes: > I'm concerned that it will make typing normal text more onerous. Right > now, org is quite non-intrusive in most of my writing yet is quite rich > in what it can encode. Having to backslash symbols that I use in text > quite often (especially square

Re: [O] Some projects

On Sunday, 25 Oct 2015 at 19:12, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > The full proposal was at > but it didn't get > much positive feedback. Therefore I suggested a simplified version, with > a single author. It's a start and that's infinitely better

Re: [O] Some projects

Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2015-10-25, at 17:37, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> I cannot think of any bad consequence if we tailor "border" in >> `org-emphasis-regexp-components' to allow everything but white spaces. > > I don't know, I guess I would

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-25, at 19:12, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Fabrice Popineau writes: > >> 2015-10-25 18:57 GMT+01:00 Thomas S. Dye : >> >> >>> would suggest an alternate wording. In this case, it would be super >>> helpful to have a

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-25, at 19:22, Eric S Fraga wrote: > By the way, I personally would like inline annotations, along the lines > of inline footnotes. Just saying... +1 -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science

Re: [O] Some projects

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > The full proposal was at > but it didn't get > much positive feedback. Therefore I suggested a simplified version, with > a single author. In my case, the lack of positive feedback was "too

Re: [O] Some projects

Thomas S. Dye writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> The full proposal was at >> but it didn't get >> much positive feedback. Therefore I suggested a simplified version, with >> a single author. > >

Re: [O] Some projects

Hi, First, thanks for writing this up, Nicolas. Org has been a bit slow lately, at least for my part. Perhaps, we should keep a file in org-mode.git which links back to discussions (TODO.org). There’s a couple of other things that we discussed recently. > ** Citations > > Development

Re: [O] Some projects

On 2015-10-25, at 20:02, Rasmus wrote: >> ** Backslash escaping > > Would be nice at times. > > I strongly disagree with introducing XML or LaTeX like syntax as is > suggested a bit further down in the thread. Since it seems I'm the only one that proposed (and liked) that idea,

Re: [O] Some projects

Thomas S. Dye writes: > Would tangling honor #+OPTIONS: :student1? #+OPTIONS: @:... is for export, so I guess not. Though, it can be implemented later. Regards,